Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

More power thru efficiency

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 10:56 PM
  #1  
Verviticas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Engine: L98 5.7
More power thru efficiency

Hi there. I was just wondering if anyone has attempted to improve rear wheel power by increasing drivetrain efficiency, and if so how much improvement have they gained.

By efficiency I mean. Base drivetrain loss is 20% or there abouts (from what I've read on this board, I have no idea personally). Replacing things like, driveshaft, wheels, brakes and stuff like that to lighter and therefore more efficient components. I think the stock shaft is 20-22 pounds, and the 1LE one is 11, carbon fiber is 8 or less. Therefore replacing the stock steel shaft with either of the latter to would yield benifits. Less rotating mass = less power lost on the way to the wheels.

Thanks, Im tired, so sorry if this isn't too clear.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #2  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
It's very clear and has been done for LONG TIME.

Aluminum wheels, aluminum driveshafts, carbon fiber driveshafts, smaller flywheels, etc., etc.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 01:23 AM
  #3  
bes217's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco,Ca area
Acutally there is not that much difference in stock steel driveshaft vs. aluminum weight. When I put on my aluminum driveshaft I weighed them to see what the difference was and it was only like 4 pounds or so. But, since this is rotating mass it makes a much bigger difference by having less weight that the engine has to spin. I don't know why I am saying this but what ever.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 02:04 AM
  #4  
Verviticas's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Engine: L98 5.7
Dont think i got my question across correctly. I was asking HOW much, % wise, did people gain from these mods? thanks
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 07:37 AM
  #5  
RB83L69's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 18,457
Likes: 16
From: Loveland, OH, US
Car: 4
Engine: 6
Transmission: 5
A good place to start is synthetic lubricants. Various people have measured that on a dyno and claim anywhere from 5 to 10 RWHP. Even at 5 RWHP on a 200 RWHP car, that's a 2.5% improvement, for almost free, doing something (regular fluid changes) that you should be doing anyway.

Other things that help without necessarily replacing parts: drive shaft alignment, make sure the brakes don't drag.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 01:09 PM
  #6  
bes217's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco,Ca area
Your brakes will always drag. That just comes with the territory of disc brakes.
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 05:52 PM
  #7  
onebinky's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Southwest Chicago 'burbs
Originally posted by bes217
Your brakes will always drag. That just comes with the territory of disc brakes.
If your brakes are dragging to the point where the wheels won't spin freely, you've got some problems that need taking care of
Reply
Old Nov 22, 2003 | 09:09 PM
  #8  
Vader's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 19,655
Likes: 309
Lightweight components won't make a difference.

Yes, less mass will mean that the components can be accelerated with less power, but once they are moving, mass has no relevance. A lightweight driveshaft may help acceleration, but won't affect peak HP or torque. It's just rudimentary physics. once a mass is moving, kinetics are in effect. It's the same with wheels, tires, axles, etc.

The areas of concentration should be drag and power transmission efficiency. Hypoid gears create more frictional losses than bevel or spur gears. Any gear arrangement has loss due to the sliding between gear teeth. Hypoid gears are among the worst. Not as bad as worm gears, but not as good as bevel gears.

Your transmission also has losses from gearing, clutches, pumps, and other parasitic loads. Reducing friction in these devices will liberate more power and efficiency than lightweight components. The lightweight parts will only allow faster acceleration.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
83 Crossfire TA
Suspension and Chassis
36
Jan 3, 2016 01:26 PM
my86bird
Firebirds for Sale
9
Oct 23, 2015 12:20 PM
Gunsbee
Electronics
4
Sep 7, 2015 07:10 PM
Slush92RS
LTX and LSX
3
Sep 2, 2015 08:56 PM
z28guy134
Engine Swap
1
Sep 1, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:49 PM.