Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Heads for a high revving 377?

Old Jan 20, 2004 | 09:38 AM
  #1  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
Heads for a high revving 377?

I'm looking to build a 377 and want it to rev to like 8000, but i don't really know what I should be looking at for heads. I know flow is important but how do I know it will support that high of RPM. I think its between AFR, Brodix, and Canfield. Suggestions?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #2  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
not even a suggestion or some help on what makes an engine rev?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 02:36 PM
  #3  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
the ability of the engine to move air in and back out as quickly as it can has a direct bearing on how high it can spin
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 03:30 PM
  #4  
AJ_92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4,969
Likes: 0
From: USA
Car: yy wife, crazy.
Engine: 350, Vortecs, 650DP
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: 8.5", 3.42
Don't assume you need a "bigger" head because of high RPM either. Smaller heads that flow a lot are the better way to go.

Think about it.... a 377 isn't that much bigger than a 350, yet smaller than a 383. And there are plenty of heads that flow more than most 350's actually use and are better suited for a 383.

So any head you see or hear of that does well on a 383 will be more than adequate for a 377.

As ede has said many times before. The air doesn’t care what the bore and stoke ratio is. All it knows is it needs to occupy 377 cubic inches of space. Flow is more relevant than the size of the runners.

What's your goal anyway. Is this going to be a street/strip car? Strip car? Street racer? Road race?

Those are all things that should be considered when deciding "how" to build an engine.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 09:02 PM
  #5  
GSXRCRAAZY's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: PGH PA
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: 700R4
If you want to keep things very streetable in the lower range, I would go with the AFR 195 heads. If you want to go a little more wild try the Edelbrock victor juniors. Do you already have a cam picked out? That and the compression will also affect what size ports work the best.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 09:17 PM
  #6  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
I want it to be street mostly. I will occassionally bring it to the strip and road race it, but nothing serious. I love having a highway car with a great top-end. I have like 225 HP now and thats fine for the bottom end, so I dont need much down low. No cam yet, I'm gonna be running about 10.5:1, or the highest I can on pump gas.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #7  
GSXRCRAAZY's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: PGH PA
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: 700R4
If it is going to be mostly street, stick with the smaller heads. Just remember to spend some money in the valvetrain dept. Things come apart pretty easy at 8K unless you have good parts. A solid flat tappet or solid roller cam, full roller rockers, stud girdles, screw in studs, hardened pushrods, and many other things will be needed to make it last. not to mention a stout bottom end. Are you using bearing spacers to use the 350 crank in the 400 block?
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2004 | 09:33 PM
  #8  
doc's Avatar
doc
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,149
Likes: 4
From: Mims, Florida
Car: '87 IROCZ
Engine: 395 ZZ4
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.70s
AFR 195 has my vote. A little expensive, but have been proven to yield the highest overall flow of any cylinder head of similar size.

To save some bucks, you might want to consider Edelbrock or Trick Flow.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #9  
stupid4901's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: everywhere
Would I be able to use a hydraulic roller cam or should I stick wih solid? Yeah I'm using the bearings to fit the crank, unless there is another way...
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #10  
GSXRCRAAZY's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: PGH PA
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: 700R4
If you really want to rev to the 8K range on a regular basis, stay away fom a hyd lifter cam. They will collapse enough to cause valve float. I recommend a solid roller if you have the money
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #11  
ede's Avatar
ede
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 14,811
Likes: 1
From: Jackson County
no question if you want 8000 go with a solid roller
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
db057
TBI
13
Sep 4, 2015 07:57 AM
db057
Tech / General Engine
4
Aug 22, 2015 08:17 PM
Dialed_In
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 20, 2015 01:45 PM
BBSDesigns
Power Adders
10
Aug 11, 2015 07:39 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.