engine siezed... cam/lifters still good?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5-speed
engine siezed... cam/lifters still good?
my gf decided to perform that castrol commercial experiment where they drain all the oil out of the car and see how long it will run for.
it decided to stop yesterday.
i put the engine in the car about 9 months ago, i put a cam in it when i did it. what are the chances the cam + lifters would be okay to put in the new engine? thoughts?
i have a 30k motor from a friend that i can put in. but if the cam is roasty toasty shes just getting the next motor put in as-is cos she wont have enough dough to get another one.
it decided to stop yesterday.i put the engine in the car about 9 months ago, i put a cam in it when i did it. what are the chances the cam + lifters would be okay to put in the new engine? thoughts?
i have a 30k motor from a friend that i can put in. but if the cam is roasty toasty shes just getting the next motor put in as-is cos she wont have enough dough to get another one.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 5
From: New Jersey
Car: 86 Corvette, 89 IROC, 1999 TA
Engine: 350, 350, LS1
Transmission: 700r4, 700r4, T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.07, 373, 4.10
pull it out and inspect it, only way to ever really know.. maybe shes lucky?
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Derby, NY, 14047
Car: 71 Skylark
Engine: BBB-430
Transmission: M20
it seems un likely, but they might be. As long as the cam has no vissual problems. i'd mic it tho. The lifters are liable to be full of metal tho,
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: 87 camaro
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5-speed
SURVEY SAYS....
cam is still good. not a mark on it. the engine lost rod bearings on 1&2, but there were no other signs of damage inside.
too bad the "new" motor is a roller motor. guess i can save this cam and put it in something else. it has about 10k on it, if not less, still looks brand new.
cam is still good. not a mark on it. the engine lost rod bearings on 1&2, but there were no other signs of damage inside.
too bad the "new" motor is a roller motor. guess i can save this cam and put it in something else. it has about 10k on it, if not less, still looks brand new.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
From: Elizabeth, Colorado
Car: '94 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
Even with the lack of visual defects on the lobs, the cam itself may have twisted or it might have micron cracks from the heat (who knows).
It's not even a thought, it's like reusing a bearing that looks good from the same assembly. Forget it - it's a paper weight and the lifters with it.
Ron
It's not even a thought, it's like reusing a bearing that looks good from the same assembly. Forget it - it's a paper weight and the lifters with it.
Ron
Last edited by ronterry; Mar 6, 2004 at 03:24 AM.
Supreme Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,009
Likes: 5
From: Pitman, NJ
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: Canfield 195 headed 358ci
Transmission: TH350, Art Carr 9.5"
Axle/Gears: 3.92 Dana 44
Originally posted by lunatic_magnet
SURVEY SAYS....
cam is still good. not a mark on it. the engine lost rod bearings on 1&2, but there were no other signs of damage inside.
too bad the "new" motor is a roller motor. guess i can save this cam and put it in something else. it has about 10k on it, if not less, still looks brand new.
SURVEY SAYS....
cam is still good. not a mark on it. the engine lost rod bearings on 1&2, but there were no other signs of damage inside.
too bad the "new" motor is a roller motor. guess i can save this cam and put it in something else. it has about 10k on it, if not less, still looks brand new.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NinjaNife
Tech / General Engine
27
Aug 23, 2015 11:49 AM




