Short Block Assembly
Thread Starter
Member

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Car: 1987 Iroc
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Short Block Assembly
I just received a call from my machinist letting me know they have finished the cleaning and magnafluxing on the block (87+ 350 roller) I picked up and it's good. Well, good except some scoring on the #7 cylinder wall. He told me they will rebore it .030 and I can now order my new pistons.
Here's my question, should I order the pistons in a rebuild kit or should I purchase the individual parts separately? I was looking at a rebuild kit from Scoggins that included Speed Pro pistons and Clevite77 bearings but I'm starting to second guess myself. My goal for the engine is pretty simple and pretty vague. I would like to have between 275-325rwhp. If my calculations are anywhere close, that's 350-400 at the crank. I plan on reusing the stock crank just having it polished, ordering new 4130 rods, new pistons, ARP bolts and of course all new gaskets and such. I was also looking at Keith Black Hypereutectic pistons which is where I started second guessing myself. I was told the Speed Pro pistons are made by TRW but are they good? If you had to choose, would you go with the KB of Speed Pro pistons? This is my first engine build up and I don't want to sacrifice the bottom end quality.
As far as the heads go, that is still up in the air. I'm looking at going with either stock L98, 113 Aluminum Vette L98 or Vortec heads. I just figured I would build a strong bottom end while I was still researching what heads I want to go with.
Any suggestions anyone can offer to build the bottom end I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
Here's my question, should I order the pistons in a rebuild kit or should I purchase the individual parts separately? I was looking at a rebuild kit from Scoggins that included Speed Pro pistons and Clevite77 bearings but I'm starting to second guess myself. My goal for the engine is pretty simple and pretty vague. I would like to have between 275-325rwhp. If my calculations are anywhere close, that's 350-400 at the crank. I plan on reusing the stock crank just having it polished, ordering new 4130 rods, new pistons, ARP bolts and of course all new gaskets and such. I was also looking at Keith Black Hypereutectic pistons which is where I started second guessing myself. I was told the Speed Pro pistons are made by TRW but are they good? If you had to choose, would you go with the KB of Speed Pro pistons? This is my first engine build up and I don't want to sacrifice the bottom end quality.
As far as the heads go, that is still up in the air. I'm looking at going with either stock L98, 113 Aluminum Vette L98 or Vortec heads. I just figured I would build a strong bottom end while I was still researching what heads I want to go with.
Any suggestions anyone can offer to build the bottom end I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
Get a kit. Have you tried Northern Auto? I get rebuild kits from them regularly, they are cheap and easy to qwork with. Here is there site: http://www.northernautoparts.com?
Martin
Martin
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
There really is no such thing as a "kit." People just toss a collection of parts into one box and call it a kit. That being said, I prefer piecing an engine out piece by piece, part by part. You will find that most of those 'kits' (using the ones offered by summit here) inlude things like HV oil pumps and in some cases, bearings of "questionable" quality. I've heard Clevit has had quality control issues. I use strictly Federal Mogul now.
Speed Pro, TRW, all one in the same as they are all under the name of Federal Mogul. For cast, sure they are fine. For hypereutectics, yea they are ok. Another name for hypereutectics is Keith Black, like you suggest. I would probably end up with KB.
me with plastigauge. That stuff has no right to be around an engine. Do it right, use a good feeler gauge.
As for heads, wathc out for hidden costs. Depending on what cam you plan on running, most of those heads will require some milling down of the guide boss to allow for more valve lift. Things lock up around .480" valve lift otherwise. Another thing to consider. In order to really bring out the heads, they would have to be ported and polished, which isn't hard. Get an electric die grinder, speed adjuster device, and some carbides and have at it. Sitting Bull has a link to a how to in his sig. They were for a 601 head, IIRC. But the general theory applies for all heads, except the Vortec. Talk to F-BIRD'88 about porting Vortec's.
Speed Pro, TRW, all one in the same as they are all under the name of Federal Mogul. For cast, sure they are fine. For hypereutectics, yea they are ok. Another name for hypereutectics is Keith Black, like you suggest. I would probably end up with KB.
me with plastigauge. That stuff has no right to be around an engine. Do it right, use a good feeler gauge.
As for heads, wathc out for hidden costs. Depending on what cam you plan on running, most of those heads will require some milling down of the guide boss to allow for more valve lift. Things lock up around .480" valve lift otherwise. Another thing to consider. In order to really bring out the heads, they would have to be ported and polished, which isn't hard. Get an electric die grinder, speed adjuster device, and some carbides and have at it. Sitting Bull has a link to a how to in his sig. They were for a 601 head, IIRC. But the general theory applies for all heads, except the Vortec. Talk to F-BIRD'88 about porting Vortec's.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 3,852
Likes: 1
From: Valley of the Sun
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer
People just toss a collection of parts into one box and call it a kit.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 574
Likes: 1
From: San Lorenzo, California
Car: 1987 Firebird Trans AM
Engine: 383 TPI...very soon
Transmission: TH700R4
Originally posted by Stekman
me with plastigauge. That stuff has no right to be around an engine. Do it right, use a good feeler gauge.
me with plastigauge. That stuff has no right to be around an engine. Do it right, use a good feeler gauge.
Trending Topics
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: North Denver area
Car: 1989 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by Stekman
me with plastigauge. That stuff has no right to be around an engine. Do it right, use a good feeler gauge.
I cannot believe you said that. Have you ever rebuilt an engine Stekman ?
Plasti-gage is what you use on the main and rod bearings. I haven't rebuilt an engine in at least 13 years and I know they didn't invent a feeler gauge for main and rod bearing clearances since then.
me with plastigauge. That stuff has no right to be around an engine. Do it right, use a good feeler gauge.
I cannot believe you said that. Have you ever rebuilt an engine Stekman ?
Plasti-gage is what you use on the main and rod bearings. I haven't rebuilt an engine in at least 13 years and I know they didn't invent a feeler gauge for main and rod bearing clearances since then.
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 574
Likes: 1
From: San Lorenzo, California
Car: 1987 Firebird Trans AM
Engine: 383 TPI...very soon
Transmission: TH700R4
It's strange.. I asked in another post also, and someone replied Feeler Gauge also... Now I'm more confused...
So which is it... Feeler gauge, plastigauge, mic...?
So which is it... Feeler gauge, plastigauge, mic...?
TGO Supporter
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,803
Likes: 2
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Car: Z28
Engine: Sb2.2 406
Transmission: Jerico 4 speed
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" 3.60
Originally posted by NascarFool
I cannot believe you said that. Have you ever rebuilt an engine Stekman ?
Plasti-gage is what you use on the main and rod bearings.
I cannot believe you said that. Have you ever rebuilt an engine Stekman ?
Plasti-gage is what you use on the main and rod bearings. 
Yes I have (re)built an engine. I used a mike, dial bore guage, and a snap gauge. Feeler gauges were also around that engine, thouh. Plastigauge isn't accurate enough for me.
Last edited by Stekman; Oct 19, 2004 at 01:40 AM.
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan
Car: 1986 Iroc
Engine: 454 Demon 850DP
Transmission: TH350, 3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Yes I have (re)built an engine. I used a mike, dial bore guage, and a snap gauge. Feeler gauges were also around that engine, thouh. Plastigauge isn't accurate enough for me.
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 801
Likes: 1
From: st. Petersburg, Fla
Car: 83 Z28
Engine: vortec 305 for now
Transmission: 5 speed
IMO, I'd use the machine shop for a parts source. If you low ball the guy and buy parts froma catalog and have a problem, there's no one to bail you out. There are quality parts out there, but I prefer to purchase then from the local machine shoip (or through them) That way they make a few more bucks, you can go to them for advice and everybody is happier.
As far as using plastigauge, let me say this, I don't "build" engines, there are guys out there who own machine shops that are very good at what they do and they can go through the whole assembly process. I like to have my machine shop do the work, and then assemble the engine my way. That way, I know how it went together and it gives me an opportunity to recheck the machine shop, besides, the customer comes back to me, not the machine shop, so I like to see what's going on. During this assembly I use plastigauge to check tolerances , just to make sure. It is no substitute for mics!!!! But it does give you another tool to use.
As far as using plastigauge, let me say this, I don't "build" engines, there are guys out there who own machine shops that are very good at what they do and they can go through the whole assembly process. I like to have my machine shop do the work, and then assemble the engine my way. That way, I know how it went together and it gives me an opportunity to recheck the machine shop, besides, the customer comes back to me, not the machine shop, so I like to see what's going on. During this assembly I use plastigauge to check tolerances , just to make sure. It is no substitute for mics!!!! But it does give you another tool to use.
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,789
Likes: 0
From: NOR CAL USA
Car: 89 iroc-z 5.7tpi 350,
Engine: 5.7tpi 350,
Transmission: T-56
in my engine rebuilding class at college ase cert... we spent a good time trying to proove plastigauges reliability... we used every method of measurment for clearences guess what??? platigauge wasnt off one bit when used correctly thats the keyword.
for instance when measuring con rods clearences only put oil on the bottom half of the bearing no oil goes on the side with the plastigauge thats where people commonly mess up...i have my work sheets from that class still im a believer in plastigauge
for instance when measuring con rods clearences only put oil on the bottom half of the bearing no oil goes on the side with the plastigauge thats where people commonly mess up...i have my work sheets from that class still im a believer in plastigauge
Senior Member

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan
Car: 1986 Iroc
Engine: 454 Demon 850DP
Transmission: TH350, 3500 stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by ljnowell
His advice is just as good as someone saying "use plastigauge".
His advice is just as good as someone saying "use plastigauge".
At least plastigage can be used for that purpose unlke a "feeler guage"
At least plastigage can be used for that purpose unlke a "feeler guage"
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Night rider327
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 2, 2015 04:17 AM





