cam and intake?

Subscribe
Nov 18, 2001 | 05:41 PM
  #1  
my car is basically a stock 305 TBI
and i am wanting a new CAM and intake manifold and maybe an edelbrock 600 cfm carb.... anyone have better recommendations? i just want to run maybe 13s in the quarter.....
Reply 0
Nov 18, 2001 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
ur not gonna get it to run 13's with just a cam and intake combo.
You need about 300h/p to hit a high 13.

a 305 with cam/intake and ported heads will maybe get u into the 13's.
Reply 0
Nov 19, 2001 | 01:25 AM
  #3  
You will likely need a higher stall torque converter to dip into the 13s. It ain't easy with a 305.
Reply 0
Nov 19, 2001 | 08:51 AM
  #4  
ok so new cam, intake, raised fuel pressure, torque converter, and ported heads....anything else??? ANY SPECIFIC KINDS?
Reply 0
Nov 19, 2001 | 10:56 AM
  #5  
edelbrock performer rpm, 750cfm carb, stock ported heads, 1800rpm stall, headman shorty headers with Y pipe.

Or you could just get a edelbrock tbi perforemer manifold and upgrade the injectors, if you are just keeping the 305, its not worth it to rip the fuel injection off.
Reply 0
Nov 19, 2001 | 11:43 AM
  #6  
The best intake you can put on it right now would be a set of good headers. All the intake in the world won't do you a bit of good if whatever you can cram into the motor can't get back out.

The bottlenecks in that motor are, in order of importance: the exhaust, every single piece from the heads to the street; the cam; the heads; the air filter; and then after all that is opened up, the intake and TB. Spend your money wisely on the weakest link instead of slamming the romantic-looking highly visible bolt-on to the top of the motor that accomplishes nothing.

------------------
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
ICON Motorsports
Reply 0
Nov 19, 2001 | 12:26 PM
  #7  
I should also add, before you need to waste money on the intake manifold "eye candy", you also need a decent rear gear. You have 2.73s now, the worst choice of all those avaliable in these cars from a performance point of view. That's not an engine mod per se, but is essential to get your money's worth out of whatever you do to the motor.

------------------
"So many Mustangs, so little time..."
ICON Motorsports
Reply 0
Nov 20, 2001 | 01:18 AM
  #8  
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by RB83L69:
I should also add, before you need to waste money on the intake manifold "eye candy", you also need a decent rear gear. You have 2.73s now, the worst choice of all those avaliable in these cars from a performance point of view. That's not an engine mod per se, but is essential to get your money's worth out of whatever you do to the motor.

</font>
The one thing that saves you, if you have 2.73s and a 700r4, is that massive first gear at 3.06 to 1! In comparison to any other GM transmission (auto or standard) this turns your 2.73s into 3.23s!

Thus a roughly 2200 rpm torque converter ought to make that Camaro come off the line pretty well, compared to most other setups
Reply 0
Subscribe