1.7 Ratio Roller rockers
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Port Angeles, Wa
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
1.7 Ratio Roller rockers
I have been doing a lot of studying lately and have found many diffrent rockers.... I Found some roller rockers that are 1.7 ratio and require the 7/16's studs and I am wondering can you just swap the studs (since they are screw in's in my trick flows) to the 7/16's and install the 1.7 ratio's? I am planning a cam swap and correct valve springs for the adventure but just wanted to know if anyone has used the 1.7 ratio before?
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
From: Doghouse
Car: Pro Stadium Tough Truck
Engine: Buick V6 272 cu in
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: Broken most of the time
You will probably need to upgrade to better push rods with 1.7 rockers. That may lead to a clearence problem for the pushrods going through the head (depends on the heads...) I wouldn't go that much on a street car. Instead, get a bigger cam (roller).
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Port Angeles, Wa
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
Well these were for SBC not for LS1 and this isn't a street car so im not to concerned about thar....... The pushrod problem did come to mind but I guess I will have to contact some of the manufacturers about it.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 1
From: Armpit state
Car: 71 Nova
Engine: Superramed 383, Topline heads
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 8.2 posi 3.08
Superstock engines have used 1.7 rockers. I cant add much other than they use shaft assemblies.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
Swapping the studs is no problem. Just make sure the dimensions are correct on the thread length at both ends. I would think that a 1.7 rocker ratio might cause problems as mentioned above. You would need to make sure that there is clearance in the heads. Also that the pushrod does not contact the rocker arm at full lift.
You will also have to make sure there is enough spring clearance to stay out of coil bind and the recommended .050-.060" spring coil clearance at max lift. With the high lift cams available maybe the 1.6 rocker ratio might be enough. There are also 1.65 ratios out there. And last but not least the decrease in the life of your valve train componets. Make sure to use the best if you decide to go that route.
You will also have to make sure there is enough spring clearance to stay out of coil bind and the recommended .050-.060" spring coil clearance at max lift. With the high lift cams available maybe the 1.6 rocker ratio might be enough. There are also 1.65 ratios out there. And last but not least the decrease in the life of your valve train componets. Make sure to use the best if you decide to go that route.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Port Angeles, Wa
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
Well the problem I have is that I ran a forged I-beam rod instead of a H-beam capscrew style and when I clearance it I did it for the cam I am running now which is a .501 so I can't run much more then that. I guess I might just pull it back apart and put in some H-beams instead so I can go to a much more aggresive ramp. If I did do the rocker swap I would of course change to the proper springs so that coil bind would not happen as well.
Trending Topics
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 747
Likes: 1
From: Reno, NV
Car: 1982 Z28 & 1967 RR/SS 396
Engine: ZZ383 & 375hp 396
Transmission: T56 & factory TH400
Axle/Gears: 9" ford & 12 bolt 4.10
On my race motor in the dragster we run 1.85 on the intake and 1.80 on the exhaust. Of coarse you have to check for proper clearance and stay out of coil bind.
I would say that "the recommended .050-.060" spring coil clearance at max lift" that 1989GTATransAm listed is way too close. I would say that you need to have .100 minimum clearance. Of coarse if it is an all out race motor you can run it a bit tighter.
I run .075 but we run huge valve spring pressue and a rev kit. I turn the dragster motor over 9600 through the lights.
I would say that "the recommended .050-.060" spring coil clearance at max lift" that 1989GTATransAm listed is way too close. I would say that you need to have .100 minimum clearance. Of coarse if it is an all out race motor you can run it a bit tighter.
I run .075 but we run huge valve spring pressue and a rev kit. I turn the dragster motor over 9600 through the lights.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,763
Likes: 4
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73
9600 RPM on a pushrod motor?!?! geez, is that even possible???
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Port Angeles, Wa
Car: 1983 Camaro Z28
Engine: 584
Transmission: TSI Glide
Axle/Gears: Quick performance 9 inch
Hey comp, so did you clearance the heads for the extended rockers or do they just fit? The only thing I am wondering is pushrod geometry and wether or not they will not go at to much on an angle.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM





