Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

Old Jun 17, 2010 | 10:02 AM
  #1  
vendetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350HSR
Transmission: HD 700r4 B&M Stage2 SK
Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

hey guys so i was talking to my buddy last nightand he pulls out this new fuel rail
for his car and it was sweet, anodiesed goldy yellow and nice blue fittings.

anyways im considering doing a few peices under my hood, fuel rails, HSR, ect ect

what are the pros/cons of each? any experience with anodising?

thanks
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 05:44 PM
  #2  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

Anodising is more expensive but better.
The industrial equipment I work with, anodising has better corrosion resistance and is necessary on complex parts.
Take a steel hydraulic tube assembly for instance. At either end is a flare nut on the tube. If it were powdercoated the area under the nut would be unprotected.
Pros for powdercoating: cheaper on simple parts that won't have as much exposure to corrosion.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #3  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

If you can get your hands on alodine it leaves a very nice goldish color on bare aluminum.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:25 PM
  #4  
vendetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350HSR
Transmission: HD 700r4 B&M Stage2 SK
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

Originally Posted by Twin_Turbo
If you can get your hands on alodine it leaves a very nice goldish color on bare aluminum.

what is alodine?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:28 PM
  #5  
vendetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350HSR
Transmission: HD 700r4 B&M Stage2 SK
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

Originally Posted by Supervisor42
Anodising is more expensive but better.
The industrial equipment I work with, anodising has better corrosion resistance and is necessary on complex parts.
Take a steel hydraulic tube assembly for instance. At either end is a flare nut on the tube. If it were powdercoated the area under the nut would be unprotected.
Pros for powdercoating: cheaper on simple parts that won't have as much exposure to corrosion.
now if i did the plenum and manifold for my Stealth ram do you thin there would be any issues? im assuming the whole whing would have to be done as you couldnt mask off anynthing for a electroplating type process
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:34 PM
  #6  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

Originally Posted by vendetta
what is alodine?
\

It's a solution that covers the alu w/ a protective chromium conversion layer.

Typically used in aircrafts, I think aircraftspruce sells it.

It turns out like this, IMO that's ff-in pretty. It's not as durable as anodizing though

Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #7  
vendetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350HSR
Transmission: HD 700r4 B&M Stage2 SK
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

i actually quite like that, im hoping to do reds and blacks though
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #8  
Supervisor42's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,675
Likes: 3
From: Arab, Alabama
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350 4BBL
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

You may want to mask off threaded holes (screw a short bolt in them).
Hardest part would be finding a place that can dip them.
There's a place here in Huntsville that anodizes but they do production runs of thousands of identical parts. I doubt they will do one-offs.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #9  
Twin_Turbo's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

We can't even get it here anymore..typical european green weenies/tree huggers and eco idiots ruin everything here. So much for my plans to one day build a complete black/gold car in a sort of smokey yunick type way. I was wanting to do that w my 82 trans am 9it's gold/black), I detest gold painted alu parts though.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 06:50 PM
  #10  
vendetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350HSR
Transmission: HD 700r4 B&M Stage2 SK
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

ive contacted a company in Calgary here and they dont mind it at all i gather
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 02:35 PM
  #11  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 413
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

I think it depends what you mean by durable. Chemicals are one thing, a hammer is another!!!!! I know you can easily scratch anodized surfaces. Powdercoat you can git with a hammer, and if done properly, should be fine. My TPI is powdercoated, and is pretty much as it was the day I had it done. ...and for that matter, every aftermarket suspension piece you can buy is powerdercoated. Sure, it's cheaper, and easier to do one offs, but I think they're totally different processes designed for totally different types of durability.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2010 | 02:37 PM
  #12  
vendetta's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, Alberta
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z28
Engine: 350HSR
Transmission: HD 700r4 B&M Stage2 SK
Re: Anodising Vs. Powdercoating engine parts

Originally Posted by Abubaca
I think it depends what you mean by durable. Chemicals are one thing, a hammer is another!!!!! I know you can easily scratch anodized surfaces. Powdercoat you can git with a hammer, and if done properly, should be fine. My TPI is powdercoated, and is pretty much as it was the day I had it done. ...and for that matter, every aftermarket suspension piece you can buy is powerdercoated. Sure, it's cheaper, and easier to do one offs, but I think they're totally different processes designed for totally different types of durability.

i figured theyd have different use's, i just thought it was a really cool and different look
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
Jun 20, 2017 04:04 AM
italiano67
Tech / General Engine
8
Dec 11, 2016 09:21 AM
Caspar
TPI
24
Jun 19, 2016 11:19 PM
bradleydeanuhl
DFI and ECM
4
Aug 12, 2015 11:48 AM
1nastygta
Firebirds for Sale
2
Aug 8, 2015 07:38 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:36 PM.