Cam swap
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, Fl
Car: 92 Firebird, 91 GTA
Engine: 305 TBI, 350 TPI, * LS1 (Building)
Cam swap
Hey guys in kinda torn. Currently have my 383 hsr ready to go. Here's my dilemma. The cam in it (lunati 60121) isn't really what I want lope wise. The cam is already degreed and installed we just haven't dropped it in the car yet.
Just found the ***** thumpr line and it sounds a bit more like what I wanted.
Since the cam is already degreed are these specs close enough to just pop out the lunati and drop in the comp?
Or am I up a creek and should i just keep the lunati?
http://www.lunatipower.com/CamSpecCard.aspx?partNumber=60121
http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/cam-specs/Details.aspx?csid=217&sb=2
Just found the ***** thumpr line and it sounds a bit more like what I wanted.
Since the cam is already degreed are these specs close enough to just pop out the lunati and drop in the comp?
Or am I up a creek and should i just keep the lunati?
http://www.lunatipower.com/CamSpecCard.aspx?partNumber=60121
http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/cam-specs/Details.aspx?csid=217&sb=2
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Car: Fourth Gen '94 camaro
Engine: 350 Gen II
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Cam swap
Whats your compression ratio?
The Thumper will make quite a bit more power but not a cam for a daily driver or much street traffic at all. U will have to match vlv springs with your Thumper cam also and i doubt springs for the voodo cam will be adequate for the Thumper.
If u really want a narley cam them the Thumper is for u. But u will need new vlv springs and the Thumper can handle/utilize more compression.
But if u gonna drive it every day then stay with the voodo cam. Its your choice man.
BTW what does "hsr" mean?
The Thumper will make quite a bit more power but not a cam for a daily driver or much street traffic at all. U will have to match vlv springs with your Thumper cam also and i doubt springs for the voodo cam will be adequate for the Thumper.
If u really want a narley cam them the Thumper is for u. But u will need new vlv springs and the Thumper can handle/utilize more compression.
But if u gonna drive it every day then stay with the voodo cam. Its your choice man.
BTW what does "hsr" mean?
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Cam swap
Hey guys in kinda torn. Currently have my 383 hsr ready to go. Here's my dilemma. The cam in it (lunati 60121) isn't really what I want lope wise. The cam is already degreed and installed we just haven't dropped it in the car yet.
Just found the ***** thumpr line and it sounds a bit more like what I wanted.
Since the cam is already degreed are these specs close enough to just pop out the lunati and drop in the comp?
Or am I up a creek and should i just keep the lunati?
http://www.lunatipower.com/CamSpecCa...rtNumber=60121
http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...?csid=217&sb=2
Just found the ***** thumpr line and it sounds a bit more like what I wanted.
Since the cam is already degreed are these specs close enough to just pop out the lunati and drop in the comp?
Or am I up a creek and should i just keep the lunati?
http://www.lunatipower.com/CamSpecCa...rtNumber=60121
http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...?csid=217&sb=2
The lunati cam you listed will sound pretty tame in the 383. It'll go well, and you'll have a ton of torque. But you are right that it won't sound radical. But you shouldn't choose your cam based on idle sound. You should choose it to match your intended build and parts.
The radical lopey cam may sound cool, but might not perform all that great for what you want.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Cam swap
Whats your compression ratio?
The Thumper will make quite a bit more power but not a cam for a daily driver or much street traffic at all. U will have to match vlv springs with your Thumper cam also and i doubt springs for the voodo cam will be adequate for the Thumper.
If u really want a narley cam them the Thumper is for u. But u will need new vlv springs and the Thumper can handle/utilize more compression.
But if u gonna drive it every day then stay with the voodo cam. Its your choice man.
BTW what does "hsr" mean?
The Thumper will make quite a bit more power but not a cam for a daily driver or much street traffic at all. U will have to match vlv springs with your Thumper cam also and i doubt springs for the voodo cam will be adequate for the Thumper.
If u really want a narley cam them the Thumper is for u. But u will need new vlv springs and the Thumper can handle/utilize more compression.
But if u gonna drive it every day then stay with the voodo cam. Its your choice man.
BTW what does "hsr" mean?
Big cam's aren't for everyone, I agree. I built my engine with an eye towards high RPM performance. And once tuned it'll scream up there. But while its servicible around town, its not happy under 2000rpm. Parking lots and traffic are a bitch. I have to work the clutch hard when it starts to buck.
It doesn't start to respond till 4000rpm, and isn't really on cam till 5000-5500rpm. But it sings to 7000 quite nice.
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Car: Fourth Gen '94 camaro
Engine: 350 Gen II
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Cam swap
Wish i could put a Stealth Ram in my 4th gen. I cant even buy a Super Ram anymore - good luck finding even a used one.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, Fl
Car: 92 Firebird, 91 GTA
Engine: 305 TBI, 350 TPI, * LS1 (Building)
Re: Cam swap
Whats your compression ratio?
The Thumper will make quite a bit more power but not a cam for a daily driver or much street traffic at all. U will have to match vlv springs with your Thumper cam also and i doubt springs for the voodo cam will be adequate for the Thumper.
If u really want a narley cam them the Thumper is for u. But u will need new vlv springs and the Thumper can handle/utilize more compression.
But if u gonna drive it every day then stay with the voodo cam. Its your choice man.
BTW what does "hsr" mean?
The Thumper will make quite a bit more power but not a cam for a daily driver or much street traffic at all. U will have to match vlv springs with your Thumper cam also and i doubt springs for the voodo cam will be adequate for the Thumper.
If u really want a narley cam them the Thumper is for u. But u will need new vlv springs and the Thumper can handle/utilize more compression.
But if u gonna drive it every day then stay with the voodo cam. Its your choice man.
BTW what does "hsr" mean?
Hsr=Holley Stealth Ram
Valve Springs are the AFR beehive's I wouldn't want to take it past 6000rpm cause of valve float though the thumper has a slightly higher rpm range flirting with the 6k. Still has the 3.42s in the back and a built 700r4 with a low stall because it'll be a daily. as of now mostly highway. Dougs Long tube headers out to Borla. Compression ratio around 10:1. From what I've read my low end should be similar to what it was when it was a stock 350, and It was fun as heck. I just wanted to pick up the powerband a bit.
Last edited by SR71BLKBRD; Jun 7, 2015 at 02:05 AM.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Trending Topics
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Adrian, Mi
Car: 1989 Camaro
Engine: 350 but it's torn down right now.
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: I'm working on it,lol.
Re: Cam swap
The radical lopey cam may sound cool, but might not perform all that great for what you want.[/QUOTE]
Member

Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 137
Likes: 1
From: EL Paso, Tx
Car: '89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700 R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77
Re: Cam swap
If you want to have a daily driver with creature comforts and good street manners, then stick with what you have. If you make it more into strip car, then you'll really only enjoy it when racing....how often is that going to happen?
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 478
Likes: 4
From: Las Vegas
Car: Fourth Gen '94 camaro
Engine: 350 Gen II
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Cam swap
Yea the stock LT1 intake is a hemholtz design that has no pulse wave peak - runners are to short. Makes a nice flat torque curve though - with most larger than stock cams. But the super ram and HSR would put the power peak right where i want it for the cam im using now - ram jet #14097395. Shorter duration than stock. The cam quits by 5800rpm and one of those intakes would pick up my power curve there. My dyno sheet looks like a nice smooth down turn there, more of a radius than a slope. I do have fun with that cam though - 18.5" Hg vac at idle but burns rubber like nothing.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,535
Likes: 17
From: Bowdon, GA.
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 355, 10.34:1, 249/252 @.050", IK200
Transmission: TH-400, 3500 stall 9.5" converter
Axle/Gears: Ford 9", detroit locker, 3.89 gears
Re: Cam swap
I am NOT a fan of the thumpr cams. They are made to sound cool but leave a lot of power on the table. IMHO they are best suited for 50-70 year olds with a tri 5 chevy that only drives the car to the local car show/cruise in and ice cream shop on the weekend.
The lunati cam will give you much better usable power/performance, and a slight lope to the idle.
If you build for the cool race car idle sound and try to drive the car a lot you will not be happy with the results you get.
Now being a 383 you may be able to run more cam in the thing but would need your detailed build sheet to tell that, but still the thumper cam would not be the right match.
The lunati cam will give you much better usable power/performance, and a slight lope to the idle.
If you build for the cool race car idle sound and try to drive the car a lot you will not be happy with the results you get.
Now being a 383 you may be able to run more cam in the thing but would need your detailed build sheet to tell that, but still the thumper cam would not be the right match.
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, Fl
Car: 92 Firebird, 91 GTA
Engine: 305 TBI, 350 TPI, * LS1 (Building)
Re: Cam swap
Thanks for the feedback guys I appreciate it. I guess Ill just keep the lunati for now, atleast until I can get another daily. The build isnt too radical but for the amount ive spent I should have just gone LS and been done with it. stock rods, cast iron 383 crank, 4.030 2v relief flat tops, 195 afr's, arp bolts throughout, with the hsr, 36 injectors, 52 mm tb. full msd ignition with box, long tubes out to the borla. kinda want a mix of a show car and a daily. something very clean that If i decide to sell it, ill have no issues doing so. Was also told the headers and the exhaust should help with the sound quite a bit.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Cam swap
Thanks for the feedback guys I appreciate it. I guess Ill just keep the lunati for now, atleast until I can get another daily. The build isnt too radical but for the amount ive spent I should have just gone LS and been done with it. stock rods, cast iron 383 crank, 4.030 2v relief flat tops, 195 afr's, arp bolts throughout, with the hsr, 36 injectors, 52 mm tb. full msd ignition with box, long tubes out to the borla. kinda want a mix of a show car and a daily. something very clean that If i decide to sell it, ill have no issues doing so. Was also told the headers and the exhaust should help with the sound quite a bit.
I have the 195cc's on my LT1 with the upgraded springs. Am good to about 7200rpm, the short block is good for a hair more. But the PCM stops at 7000rpm.
So when I chose my cam I went with one that brought max power around 6500-6700rpm.
Lloyd Elliot specc'ed it out for me. 231/239 @ .050" on a 110LSA. .587"/.583" lift. You can tell its cammed. And its okay down low, but not great. But I expected that. Wants to be around 4000rpm before you can start to play, anything below that it lacks any real punch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CqOuPfT3aM
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 217
Likes: 1
From: Tampa, Fl
Car: 92 Firebird, 91 GTA
Engine: 305 TBI, 350 TPI, * LS1 (Building)
Re: Cam swap
No I didn't. The cams peak powerband is between like 1800-5800 rpm. didn't think it was necessary to upgrade if I'm not taking it that high. Msd Ignition box should keep me under 5900.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
Re: Cam swap
It may not have the lope you like, but its going to feel great in all street driving situations.
If you aren't using 1.6 Rockers you'll probably want to to take advantage of the flow of the AFRs. They'll be happier with the 1.6s.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






