spanked a Lightning on my way to work
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
spanked a Lightning on my way to work
This guy in a new model Ford Lightning tried to race me for like 4 or 5 miles so I decided to run just to see what my 87 Z-28 could do against a new SVT. We started from a 15 mph kick, my dang camaro geared down to first and flat out screamed! I left him by a little over a car length all the way up to about 70mph before I let out of it. All I have is a LG4 305 with hooker headers, y-pipe & 3in
exhaust, K&N, cold temp thermostat and a 3.73 gear but the car runs very strong. That made my day, we pulled over and talked about the run, he was cool as hell. Just some older dude but he had a nice truck.
exhaust, K&N, cold temp thermostat and a 3.73 gear but the car runs very strong. That made my day, we pulled over and talked about the run, he was cool as hell. Just some older dude but he had a nice truck.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Are you sure it was a real lightning? If it was there must be something really wrong with it. Because I dont think the fastest N/A 305 on these boards can take a new lightning. I would guess your running low 15's with your mods and hes running low 13's. Im not trying to say your lying it just sounds a little impossible.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
you'd be surprised, the car has always ran strong from a kick, and besides, those Lightnings aren't that fast and I got lucky.
There's alot more to racing than flooring it too. I also own a 98 WS6 T/A with a 6-speed and that car is very fast, it will hand a Lightnings it's *** with no prob. My camaro is actually decent for a 305, I know they aren't nothing compared to newer camaro's or mustangs but it moves the old car around pretty good.
There's alot more to racing than flooring it too. I also own a 98 WS6 T/A with a 6-speed and that car is very fast, it will hand a Lightnings it's *** with no prob. My camaro is actually decent for a 305, I know they aren't nothing compared to newer camaro's or mustangs but it moves the old car around pretty good.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Originally posted by Jgolden314
ligtnings run low 13s? I see lots of low 14s and HIGH 13s in the area.
ligtnings run low 13s? I see lots of low 14s and HIGH 13s in the area.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
thats pretty good times, I've never ran either one of my cars at the strip yet but I will as soon as I get off of overtime. Whats the HP rating on a newer Lightning?????
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: motor city outside of detroit
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 Tpi (and not the average)
Transmission: 5 spd warner
My *** you beat a lightning!
my gramps new lightning with street tires and a k
&n rana 13.30 @115
&n rana 13.30 @115
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
Now if we had raced from a dead stop or on the interstate he would have stomped my ***. I don't lie and I am not bragging, but I thought it was pretty cool so I wanted to share it. He was pulling on me fairly hard when I backed out so, yes, eventually, he would have blown by waving but from 15 to 70, thats not bad in my opinion. And why do ya'll pop up all of these different time slips for a Lightning? Do any of you really know what your talking about????? seriously! I race autocross for the ETRSCCA in Tennessee so I know a little about racing, not much, but enough and I have seen a Dodge Omni outrun a 5.0 mustang so anything is possible. Sorry to offend anyone but come on Guys!!!
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
From: Cypress,Tx
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 350 carbed now
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's
Originally posted by ss400hp
Now if we had raced from a dead stop or on the interstate he would have stomped my ***. I don't lie and I am not bragging, but I thought it was pretty cool so I wanted to share it. He was pulling on me fairly hard when I backed out so, yes, eventually, he would have blown by waving but from 15 to 70, thats not bad in my opinion. And why do ya'll pop up all of these different time slips for a Lightning? Do any of you really know what your talking about????? seriously! I race autocross for the ETRSCCA in Tennessee so I know a little about racing, not much, but enough and I have seen a Dodge Omni outrun a 5.0 mustang so anything is possible. Sorry to offend anyone but come on Guys!!!
Now if we had raced from a dead stop or on the interstate he would have stomped my ***. I don't lie and I am not bragging, but I thought it was pretty cool so I wanted to share it. He was pulling on me fairly hard when I backed out so, yes, eventually, he would have blown by waving but from 15 to 70, thats not bad in my opinion. And why do ya'll pop up all of these different time slips for a Lightning? Do any of you really know what your talking about????? seriously! I race autocross for the ETRSCCA in Tennessee so I know a little about racing, not much, but enough and I have seen a Dodge Omni outrun a 5.0 mustang so anything is possible. Sorry to offend anyone but come on Guys!!!
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
From: Milan, MI
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Re: My *** you beat a lightning!
Originally posted by TpiTony
my gramps new lightning with street tires and a k
&n rana 13.30 @115
my gramps new lightning with street tires and a k
&n rana 13.30 @115
thats a nice time though!
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
my gramps new lightning with street tires and a k
the typical stock Lightning runs low 14s - high 13s at 99 - 102 mph
hold on
ur saying that u pulled a ford lighting with a near stock 305 when a lt1 has trouble running them. im sorry but i have to say it was a stock f-150 with the duels and a lighting kit put on it that would make more cents.
ps. its still a kill on a ford v8 good job.
ps. its still a kill on a ford v8 good job.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Originally posted by ss400hp
Do any of you really know what your talking about????? seriously! I race autocross for the ETRSCCA in Tennessee so I know a little about racing, not much, but enough and I have seen a Dodge Omni outrun a 5.0 mustang so anything is possible. Sorry to offend anyone but come on Guys!!!
Do any of you really know what your talking about????? seriously! I race autocross for the ETRSCCA in Tennessee so I know a little about racing, not much, but enough and I have seen a Dodge Omni outrun a 5.0 mustang so anything is possible. Sorry to offend anyone but come on Guys!!!
For instance, that Dodge Omni was probably one of the ones that were turbocharged from the factory. They could actually turn out to be fairly quick cars. I've heard of Dodge Shadows running low 12s. Its pretty easy for a 12 or 13-sec car to beat a near-stock 5.0. So yes, the Omni may have beat the 5.0, but I'm sure that Omni was far from stock, whereas your car is nearly stock.
Nevertheless, I do believe you, it just seems that there was something wrong with his car or something.
TGO Supporter

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by ss400hp
Now if we had raced from a dead stop or on the interstate he would have stomped my ***. I don't lie and I am not bragging, but I thought it was pretty cool so I wanted to share it. He was pulling on me fairly hard when I backed out so, yes, eventually, he would have blown by waving but from 15 to 70, thats not bad in my opinion. And why do ya'll pop up all of these different time slips for a Lightning? Do any of you really know what your talking about????? seriously! I race autocross for the ETRSCCA in Tennessee so I know a little about racing, not much, but enough and I have seen a Dodge Omni outrun a 5.0 mustang so anything is possible. Sorry to offend anyone but come on Guys!!!
Now if we had raced from a dead stop or on the interstate he would have stomped my ***. I don't lie and I am not bragging, but I thought it was pretty cool so I wanted to share it. He was pulling on me fairly hard when I backed out so, yes, eventually, he would have blown by waving but from 15 to 70, thats not bad in my opinion. And why do ya'll pop up all of these different time slips for a Lightning? Do any of you really know what your talking about????? seriously! I race autocross for the ETRSCCA in Tennessee so I know a little about racing, not much, but enough and I have seen a Dodge Omni outrun a 5.0 mustang so anything is possible. Sorry to offend anyone but come on Guys!!!
I agree, anything can happen. Ive seen hondas eat Lt1s for breakfast!
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1989 Formula 350 / 2000 Lightning
Engine: GM HO 350 Crate (Vortec headed w/TPI) / SC 5.4 330
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 (Raptor Rebuild Kit)
Originally posted by ss400hp
you'd be surprised, the car has always ran strong from a kick, and besides, those Lightnings aren't that fast and I got lucky.
There's alot more to racing than flooring it too. I also own a 98 WS6 T/A with a 6-speed and that car is very fast, it will hand a Lightnings it's *** with no prob. My camaro is actually decent for a 305, I know they aren't nothing compared to newer camaro's or mustangs but it moves the old car around pretty good.
you'd be surprised, the car has always ran strong from a kick, and besides, those Lightnings aren't that fast and I got lucky.
There's alot more to racing than flooring it too. I also own a 98 WS6 T/A with a 6-speed and that car is very fast, it will hand a Lightnings it's *** with no prob. My camaro is actually decent for a 305, I know they aren't nothing compared to newer camaro's or mustangs but it moves the old car around pretty good.
I have an Fbod and an L....I think the Bird would get me off the line, but after 60'...NO WAY!!!!!
Check my sig for times on the L
YOUR RIGHT...NOT THAT FAST
That pass was with a K&N and gutted airboxLater
Last edited by 1fastformula; Aug 18, 2004 at 07:32 PM.
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
do they have a auto lighting? if so, that may be why he didnt run you. You must have caught gear well before he did or maybe his auto didnt shift right into a good gear. My L98 and stock stall tranny sucked at geting into the power band. Now with 2800 stall the car gets up well. Cant wait untill my 3.27's or 3.70's.
Still though, I find it hard to believe all the way up to 70. Was he closing fast and going to get you past 70? I would guess he would. Those things are fast, especially the new ones. But anything could happen and if it was legit, congrats. Just my opinion.
Still though, I find it hard to believe all the way up to 70. Was he closing fast and going to get you past 70? I would guess he would. Those things are fast, especially the new ones. But anything could happen and if it was legit, congrats. Just my opinion.
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1989 Formula 350 / 2000 Lightning
Engine: GM HO 350 Crate (Vortec headed w/TPI) / SC 5.4 330
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 (Raptor Rebuild Kit)
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
No, not till 2000 I think.
No, not till 2000 I think.
Second Gen Lightning was made in '99
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Yeah a friend of mine had a early 90's lightning but it wasnt much of a truck though. Not that fast or agressive looking. Not like the new ones today.
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1989 Formula 350 / 2000 Lightning
Engine: GM HO 350 Crate (Vortec headed w/TPI) / SC 5.4 330
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4 (Raptor Rebuild Kit)
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
do they have a auto lighting? if so, that may be why he didnt run you. You must have caught gear well before he did or maybe his auto didnt shift right into a good gear. My L98 and stock stall tranny sucked at geting into the power band. Now with 2800 stall the car gets up well. Cant wait untill my 3.27's or 3.70's.
Still though, I find it hard to believe all the way up to 70. Was he closing fast and going to get you past 70? I would guess he would. Those things are fast, especially the new ones. But anything could happen and if it was legit, congrats. Just my opinion.
do they have a auto lighting? if so, that may be why he didnt run you. You must have caught gear well before he did or maybe his auto didnt shift right into a good gear. My L98 and stock stall tranny sucked at geting into the power band. Now with 2800 stall the car gets up well. Cant wait untill my 3.27's or 3.70's.
Still though, I find it hard to believe all the way up to 70. Was he closing fast and going to get you past 70? I would guess he would. Those things are fast, especially the new ones. But anything could happen and if it was legit, congrats. Just my opinion.
My L has TORQUE off the line like my TPI 350 HO (but weighs about 2000 more pounds). Once the thing gets past the 60' mark...PULLS LIKE A SON OF A GUN!!!!!
Once it reaches 100-120...The brick like aerodynamics slows it a bit.
All in All......I must say if you beat the guy..Congrats.
I am wondering if you ran a Gen 1 or a 2 ?? I know you siad it was a newer one, but the Gen 1s ran mid 15s. A more likely run than a gen 2
Later
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,774
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by 1fastformula
The first gen Lightning was made in '93 (maybe 94 I think)
Second Gen Lightning was made in '99
The first gen Lightning was made in '93 (maybe 94 I think)
Second Gen Lightning was made in '99
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
to be honest with you, I have no clue what year this thing was, however, it was the newer body style but I looked at some on the internet and it wasn't the 03 or 04 so maybe it was a 2000 model. I just got lucky evidently, oh well, I know that my 98 Ram Air will smoke it, thats all that matters to me. the camaro did run strong which really surprised me, usually the car doesn't pick up like that but it did.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
now, a plain *** F-150 is slow as hell, this truck was NOT slow and it was not a regular F-150 with a lightning kit, he did pop the hood and it was supercharged. I know for a fact that a stock Lightning can run, but, like I said, it was from a 15 mph kick to 70 which only lasted a couple of seconds. HE WAS PULLING ON ME!!
Not all 305's are slow, I know they ain't worth a damn for performance, but I am installing a LS1 and T-56 at the first of the year, things will change, any Lightning that wants a piece will see nothing but taillights. Enough said.
Not all 305's are slow, I know they ain't worth a damn for performance, but I am installing a LS1 and T-56 at the first of the year, things will change, any Lightning that wants a piece will see nothing but taillights. Enough said.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
evidently most Irocs can't hang with the LG4, whats wrong with that picture? people talk alot of crap and think they know it all but when they get their *** reemed by a lightly built LG4, they face reality. The quad 4bll LG4's are very quick with a good gear out back, thats why they are slow from the factory. If you open up the exhaust system a little and alow the thing to breath and put a decent gear out back, they will get up and haul ***. Not like a 350, but better than any tune port 305, however, it is easier to get power out of the TPI cars. I build these cars on the side and have been doing so for several years, I am a member of the ETFBRA, and a ASE certified mechanic ( that doesn't matter though ), so I know a little. It's funny how offensive you guys get since I outran a Lightning with a LG4 car. **** happens, get over it. I have been smoked by stupid cars like a lightly built new chevy 1500 pick-up that had the 5.3 in it, a new monte carlo SS, and some family cars. I didn't cry about it, it pissed me off but hey, **** happens. This weekend I start my 406ci swap and I will run that motor untill I can afford to put the LS1 in it. That motor has around 475 horse at the crank, I just got through breaking it in last month so it should haul the camaro around pretty damn good. Guys, get the hell over it!!!!
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 2001 NBM Z-28, 1987 Camaro
Engine: LS1, LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: stock and stock
I want the LS1 because it is a more efficient and practical motor since my camaro is a daily driver in the summer. I originally built the motor ( 406ci ) to go in a 1980 chevy monza to race on the weekends, but I decided to run it in the camaro for a while just to play around and to see how good this motor is going to run. I've always been amazed at the LS1 since I own a 98 LS1 T/A and I love the power and gas mileage combo.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 5
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Car: 1987 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
My stock 2000 L runs high 13's @ 104 mph.
It's rated at 360hp, whereas the 2001-2004 Ls are rated at 380hp.
My 87 305 TPI IROC-Z (when stock) ran 15.9's @ 84 mph.
Rating? 190hp.
Then there's my '03 Cobra.....
It's rated at 360hp, whereas the 2001-2004 Ls are rated at 380hp.
My 87 305 TPI IROC-Z (when stock) ran 15.9's @ 84 mph.
Rating? 190hp.
Then there's my '03 Cobra.....
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
Wow, the lightnings you guys talk about are fast! Around here, the fastest I have seen stock lightnings run is like a 14.1, Must be the they are only slow around here!! Either way, a LG4 would get spanked by a lightning, maybe he didn't know you were racing until you dropped it down, floored it and pulled away? either way good kill.
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,926
Likes: 5
From: Tucson, Arizona USA
Car: 1987 Z28 Convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 5-speed
.... and Ls are 4900 pounds. With basically four bolt-ons, they are capable of high 12's. With more bolt-ons, low 12's are possible. Incredible for that weight.
Willie
Willie
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Binghamton, NY
Car: 94 Z-28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56
oh, no doubt do they move. I give credit for that, but the average Lightning around here runs 14.5-14.8's, its really funny actually. They do respond to mods very well tho.
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
i raced one couple weeks ago, he ran a 13.52@105 to my 14.11@97, mad tire spin and no WOT 2-3 shift on my part would be why i didn't have a 13.5 timeslip that week. i am desperately looking for that 13.5 timeslip from my 305 and expect it next time i am at the track: m/t drag radials and new tranny/converter combo going in before the next trip to the track.
Member
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Trabuco Canyon, CA
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L
Transmission: Auto
Originally posted by ss400hp
**** happens, get over it. I have been smoked by stupid cars like a lightly built new chevy 1500 pick-up that had the 5.3 in it, a new monte carlo SS, and some family cars. I didn't cry about it, it pissed me off but hey, **** happens.
**** happens, get over it. I have been smoked by stupid cars like a lightly built new chevy 1500 pick-up that had the 5.3 in it, a new monte carlo SS, and some family cars. I didn't cry about it, it pissed me off but hey, **** happens.
If ss400hp will admit to getting beat by lesser cars, I suppose it's possible that the Lightning driver was caught off guard and lost. Yep, racing on the street can yield some odd results. My other-than-thirdgen car has shocked a few people on and off the track, so what the heck. You just never know.
Still, I'd like to see what kind of 1/4 mile times ss400hp can run, if he gets the chance to make a few passes at the track.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM








Sorry I had to say it.

