2.8 vs 01 Eclispe GS
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Glenville, NY
Car: 1987 Firebird
Engine: LB8, 2.8L V6
Transmission: t-5
2.8 vs 01 Eclispe GS
Ok, I want to know if there is anyway I can beat my friend's eclipse(FWD) with my ****ty 2.8L. Both are 5spds and pretty much stock. I have an aftermarket muffler, got rid of the smog pump, and will be gutting the cat out soon too. Thats pretty much it. Just would like to have an idea how bad its gonna be.
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 720
Likes: 0
From: you aint stealing my car..
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Auto w/ shift kit
i doubt it they arent fast but neither are you i think they might run low 16's which is around a l03 but try it anyway and good luck do it safe you guys can race up to 60 should take a nice amount of time lol
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: spartanburg, sc
Car: 1989 rs RIP, 96 grand marquis, 92rs
Engine: LO3, 4.6l, L03
Transmission: 700r4, AODE,700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73, 3.08, 2.73
[i] do it safe you guys can race up to 60 should take a nice amount of time lol [/B]
HAHAHA. btw my lo3 kills eclipses. so i think they are about 3/4 second slower than an lo3. but i dont know what times are fo the v6 third gens
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
if its a 4 cyl, it would be a decent race. If its a 3.0 v6 with a 5 speed, they can do some damage
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Car: 1987 IROC-Z Camaro
Engine: 5.7 350 TPI - SLP Runners, AFPR, MSD Goodies
Transmission: 700R4 - Shift Kit, Corvette Servo
Axle/Gears: BW 9 bolt, 3.27s
You won't get murdered, but i say hell pull on you a little.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: chicago IL
Car: 91 formula
Engine: 350 tuned port. bolt ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
well if this help any. 5 years ago i had a 1987 firebird with a 2.8 and me and my friend would race every week. he had a 4 cyl mx-3 it was very light compared to my car. every race we did we would be neck and neck. oh i forgot to ask. are you bigger than he his because the less you are the faster you will go. if he is a fata$$ you have a good chance. GOOD LUCK. next time buy a third gen with a 350tpi and you will be fine. i know i have no problem with these little **** banging stupid cars.
Thread Starter
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
From: Glenville, NY
Car: 1987 Firebird
Engine: LB8, 2.8L V6
Transmission: t-5
Originally posted by formula forever
well if this help any. 5 years ago i had a 1987 firebird with a 2.8 and me and my friend would race every week. he had a 4 cyl mx-3 it was very light compared to my car. every race we did we would be neck and neck. oh i forgot to ask. are you bigger than he his because the less you are the faster you will go. if he is a fata$$ you have a good chance. GOOD LUCK. next time buy a third gen with a 350tpi and you will be fine. i know i have no problem with these little **** banging stupid cars.
well if this help any. 5 years ago i had a 1987 firebird with a 2.8 and me and my friend would race every week. he had a 4 cyl mx-3 it was very light compared to my car. every race we did we would be neck and neck. oh i forgot to ask. are you bigger than he his because the less you are the faster you will go. if he is a fata$$ you have a good chance. GOOD LUCK. next time buy a third gen with a 350tpi and you will be fine. i know i have no problem with these little **** banging stupid cars.
Junior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: north carolina
Car: 04 Dodge SRT-4, 91 formula firebird
Engine: 2.4 L4, 305 tbi
Transmission: 5-speed, 700 r4
i was at dyno day yesterday and there was an eclipse gs-t there. it was stock besides the exhaust and a blow-off valve and dynoed 219 hp! i was shocked! that is around what my firebird runs! (for now anyways!) i know you r just racing a gs but you still better watch out. my friend has a 2.8 camaro and outran an 95 civic with a few mods on it!
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Hilliard, OH
Car: '92 Camaro RS
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 open diff
Like the other guy said, an LO3 will destroy a GS, they are probably almost a full second slower than an LO3. I have a 2.8 V6 in my '89 Chevy Celebrity, and even that can run with a GS. I think you'll edge him out.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Originally posted by banditfirebird
i was at dyno day yesterday and there was an eclipse gs-t there. it was stock besides the exhaust and a blow-off valve and dynoed 219 hp! i was shocked! that is around what my firebird runs! (for now anyways!) i know you r just racing a gs but you still better watch out. my friend has a 2.8 camaro and outran an 95 civic with a few mods on it!
i was at dyno day yesterday and there was an eclipse gs-t there. it was stock besides the exhaust and a blow-off valve and dynoed 219 hp! i was shocked! that is around what my firebird runs! (for now anyways!) i know you r just racing a gs but you still better watch out. my friend has a 2.8 camaro and outran an 95 civic with a few mods on it!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
I've driven one of those eclipses before. I floored it and was stunned that the car wasn't moving. I was actually surprised at it's lack of power. It just doesn't.. move.. not even out of it's own way.
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Car: 95 Camaro Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E w/ shift kit
Axle/Gears: 3.23s
Originally posted by Nate86
Haha... unless you have some mods, I don't think your 305 is putting down anywhere near 220HP. I'm not trying to talk ****, but I really hate it when people overestimate their engine's power. Feel free to correct me if you do have some mods that I don't know about though.
Haha... unless you have some mods, I don't think your 305 is putting down anywhere near 220HP. I'm not trying to talk ****, but I really hate it when people overestimate their engine's power. Feel free to correct me if you do have some mods that I don't know about though.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Originally posted by Epro
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml
https://www.thirdgen.org/newdesign/tech/techdb.shtml
If your car is stock, you're probably putting somewhere around 160-180 HP to the rear wheels. That would put the Eclipse about 30 HP over you in the best case scenario.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by stu
Even the V6 Eclipse is embarasingly slow.
Even the V6 Eclipse is embarasingly slow.
compared to a v6 thirdgen though the v6 eclipse is a ferarri
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RABMAN
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Sep 18, 2015 09:02 PM




