2002 Mustang GT vs. L03
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 535
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Car: 1989 Iroc Z
Engine: 496 BBC
Transmission: th400
Axle/Gears: 4.11
2002 Mustang GT vs. L03
I raced a 2002 GT from a 10 mph roll tonight and he pulled away at 60-70 mph. I was actually suprised he didnt just blaze by me the second i stomped the petal.. Its funny to see how the l03 has no top end power whatsoever.
2002 GT
5-Speed
1992 Heritage Edition Camaro
3.42
Full exhaust
2002 GT
5-Speed
1992 Heritage Edition Camaro
3.42
Full exhaust
Moderator




Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
lol....well it is only a 4.6 after all...and iver never seen a stock GT run under a 14.8....the LO3 is capable of running middle to higher 15's so theres really not a whole lot of difference....
now take that same GT engine a year later in the cobra and add that SC and your looking at a high 12 second car....the 03/04 sc cobras are just plain sick
now take that same GT engine a year later in the cobra and add that SC and your looking at a high 12 second car....the 03/04 sc cobras are just plain sick
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Hmm I have seen 13.8s out of bone stockers in good conditions, and many low low 14s out of them... I have never seen an LO3 run at the track, and even if I did wouldnt really notice it. I dont think you can call a mid to high 15 second car vs a mid 14 second car not a lot of difference, its a pretty big difference if you ask me??
An 03 Cobra bone stock is a mid to high 12 second car and with bolt ons, easy 11s all day. They are pretty sick cars as far as performance per dollar ratio!
An 03 Cobra bone stock is a mid to high 12 second car and with bolt ons, easy 11s all day. They are pretty sick cars as far as performance per dollar ratio!
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
lol....well it is only a 4.6 after all...and iver never seen a stock GT run under a 14.8....the LO3 is capable of running middle to higher 15's so theres really not a whole lot of difference....
now take that same GT engine a year later in the cobra and add that SC and your looking at a high 12 second car....the 03/04 sc cobras are just plain sick
now take that same GT engine a year later in the cobra and add that SC and your looking at a high 12 second car....the 03/04 sc cobras are just plain sick
Last edited by Nic; Nov 5, 2006 at 08:49 AM.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: ludlow mass
Car: 02 Mustang
Engine: 3.8 about to be punched out to 4.3
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Detroit true trac
a GT running high 13s is like an LS1 running 12s, it happens, but only rarely with the right driver and track conditions, new edges (99-04) are low to mid 14 second cars the S-197s (05-07s) are high 13 second cars, the SN-95 (94-98) are high 14 or low 15 second cars with either the 5.0 or the crappy 4.6
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
----------
lmao! Just stop talking... Last edited by Nic; Nov 5, 2006 at 08:53 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
a GT running high 13s is like an LS1 running 12s, it happens, but only rarely with the right driver and track conditions, new edges (99-04) are low to mid 14 second cars the S-197s (05-07s) are high 13 second cars, the SN-95 (94-98) are high 14 or low 15 second cars with either the 5.0 or the crappy 4.6
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Thats funny I too have seen a few stock 99+ GTs go 13s, yet have never seen an LS1 stock do 12s.
Also the S197s, we own one that went 13.9 in crappy air, 2500-3000 foot elevation with a passenger. At the last track event in better conditions the beams got screwed up by a leaf, but going off the timers that did work, the best run should have been about a 13.5!
I have been to the track more than most people my age and have probably seen more Mustangs run than any other car (no questions asked), so Im pretty sure I have a decent idea of what they can and cannot do!
Also the S197s, we own one that went 13.9 in crappy air, 2500-3000 foot elevation with a passenger. At the last track event in better conditions the beams got screwed up by a leaf, but going off the timers that did work, the best run should have been about a 13.5!
I have been to the track more than most people my age and have probably seen more Mustangs run than any other car (no questions asked), so Im pretty sure I have a decent idea of what they can and cannot do!
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
LOL LOL LOL Stop talking. You dont know ANYTHING about Mustangs...
If you did, you'd know 96-04 GT's came with 2 VALVE SOHC motors while 96-04 Cobras/Mach 1's came with 4 VALVE DOHC motors.
Stop now...please
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
From: North Carolina!
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 4
From: Mays Landing NJ
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
lol....well it is only a 4.6 after all...and iver never seen a stock GT run under a 14.8....the LO3 is capable of running middle to higher 15's so theres really not a whole lot of difference....
now take that same GT engine a year later in the cobra and add that SC and your looking at a high 12 second car....the 03/04 sc cobras are just plain sick
now take that same GT engine a year later in the cobra and add that SC and your looking at a high 12 second car....the 03/04 sc cobras are just plain sick
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Up hear I never seen a newer mustang hit under a 14.0 . But I am around 800-1000 ft ..... We got one banging 9's with a vortech T trim though
Seen a coupel LS1's hit 13.0 flat ... but thats it . One of them car mags had an LS1 doing 12.9's stock ... just a good driver.
Screw the new mustanges ...I am in love with them 1988 notchbacks . Dam they are sweet .
Seen a coupel LS1's hit 13.0 flat ... but thats it . One of them car mags had an LS1 doing 12.9's stock ... just a good driver. Screw the new mustanges ...I am in love with them 1988 notchbacks . Dam they are sweet .
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Yeh they're quick if you mod them right and get alot of traction. That's the real key to ETing with those things because they don't have alot of top-end so getting a good trap speed is hard. You have to squeak everything out of them.
Example, I raced one the other night (light bolton 01 5-sp GT), he ran high 13s at 98 with tires and i pulled him hard on the freeway. With a 50 shot he only trapped 103... I'd still pull him. With some good traction and good shifting im sure he could see a 12.9 with that 50 shot.
They're quick but you NEED that good traction to ET with them. I agree with the poster above - stock GTs running 13s is like LS1s running 12s. It happens but it's rare and requires a good driver. With just tires GTs should be able to hit high 13s without a problem. But like I said, they still trap low.
Example, I raced one the other night (light bolton 01 5-sp GT), he ran high 13s at 98 with tires and i pulled him hard on the freeway. With a 50 shot he only trapped 103... I'd still pull him. With some good traction and good shifting im sure he could see a 12.9 with that 50 shot.
They're quick but you NEED that good traction to ET with them. I agree with the poster above - stock GTs running 13s is like LS1s running 12s. It happens but it's rare and requires a good driver. With just tires GTs should be able to hit high 13s without a problem. But like I said, they still trap low.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Well its a LOT more common for a GT to go 13s than an LS1 to go 12s. I have seen a bunch of 13s out of GTs, never seen a 12 out of an LS1, even Vettes and Firehawks!
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
Yeh they're quick if you mod them right and get alot of traction. That's the real key to ETing with those things because they don't have alot of top-end so getting a good trap speed is hard. You have to squeak everything out of them.
Example, I raced one the other night (light bolton 01 5-sp GT), he ran high 13s at 98 with tires and i pulled him hard on the freeway. With a 50 shot he only trapped 103... I'd still pull him. With some good traction and good shifting im sure he could see a 12.9 with that 50 shot.
They're quick but you NEED that good traction to ET with them. I agree with the poster above - stock GTs running 13s is like LS1s running 12s. It happens but it's rare and requires a good driver. With just tires GTs should be able to hit high 13s without a problem. But like I said, they still trap low.
Example, I raced one the other night (light bolton 01 5-sp GT), he ran high 13s at 98 with tires and i pulled him hard on the freeway. With a 50 shot he only trapped 103... I'd still pull him. With some good traction and good shifting im sure he could see a 12.9 with that 50 shot.
They're quick but you NEED that good traction to ET with them. I agree with the poster above - stock GTs running 13s is like LS1s running 12s. It happens but it's rare and requires a good driver. With just tires GTs should be able to hit high 13s without a problem. But like I said, they still trap low.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
He had shorty headers, xpipe, mufflers and a cai. I think he said free mods as well but I dont know what the free mods are.
I'm not saying they can't ET well, because I know they can. I'm saying they trap low for what they are. Foxes out run them easily from what I've seen. 25ths traps are odd enough for a fox body, but I'd be very surprised to see a bolton GT hitting the same. My car with light bolt ons almost does 106 and I've - NEVER - lost to a 99-04 GT. Not saying it won't happen but it hasn't so far
I'm not saying they can't ET well, because I know they can. I'm saying they trap low for what they are. Foxes out run them easily from what I've seen. 25ths traps are odd enough for a fox body, but I'd be very surprised to see a bolton GT hitting the same. My car with light bolt ons almost does 106 and I've - NEVER - lost to a 99-04 GT. Not saying it won't happen but it hasn't so far
Last edited by urbanhunter44; Nov 10, 2006 at 11:04 AM.
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
They seem to trap OK to me. As a matter of fact, they seem to trap and ET comparable to the LT1 F-bodies. This is merely my track experience and what I read in forums like Drag Racing Technique over at CamaroZ28. Currently, there's a thread over there with several pages of LT1 numbers and it appears that high 13's to mid 14's is the norm for stockers with traps around 97-101.
As for never losing, you must not race much. The car I mentioned above has run a best of 12.6 @ 107 with a 1.6 60 ft. There a ton of faster ones locally, more mods of course.
As for never losing, you must not race much. The car I mentioned above has run a best of 12.6 @ 107 with a 1.6 60 ft. There a ton of faster ones locally, more mods of course.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I too have seen a few bolt on ones trapping 105+. Knew a couple guys down in Jersey running in the lower 12s with a lot of weight out, all the bolt ons and gearing to do so. Cars were trapping 110+ and even before a lot of the mods were well into the 12s with none of the weight removed and more streetable. The 2Vs are pretty weak motors, but can move with the right set of mods, exhaust and gearing!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 1
From: Brighton, CO
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
They seem to trap OK to me. As a matter of fact, they seem to trap and ET comparable to the LT1 F-bodies. This is merely my track experience and what I read in forums like Drag Racing Technique over at CamaroZ28. Currently, there's a thread over there with several pages of LT1 numbers and it appears that high 13's to mid 14's is the norm for stockers with traps around 97-101.
As for never losing, you must not race much. The car I mentioned above has run a best of 12.6 @ 107 with a 1.6 60 ft. There a ton of faster ones locally, more mods of course.
As for never losing, you must not race much. The car I mentioned above has run a best of 12.6 @ 107 with a 1.6 60 ft. There a ton of faster ones locally, more mods of course.


I guess you guys have faster mustangs than we do
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
This is probably all you'll ever need/want to know about the 2V cars:
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showt...&threadid=1877
http://forums.modulardepot.com/showt...&threadid=1877
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I actually do probably race with faster Mustangs than most. I run mainly Mustang only events, and at these you get hundreds and hundreds of them. Within those hundreds, there are always ones running good times!
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: Streamwood, IL
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
It's pretty much the same everywhere. You've got 90 percent of the owners that slap a CAI and Cat-back on or just leave it stock. Then there's the 10 percent that actually take the time to research what does and what doesn't work and builds accordingly. This goes for everything, not just Mustangs.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Well if you never seen a stock 12 second vette ... something wrong their . They are banging low 12's stock . Oh sorry thats the Z06 with 395 hp ( when they first came out. But yes the normal vettes run 12's all the time up here. ( at 800-1000 ft)
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
I've never seen a stock 1999-2004 GT go faster then 14.5
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I run with Mustangs, so I see tons and tons of them... this is why I see 13s out of stockers, 12s out of bolt on cars, and all kinds of fast stuff. I dont see how that would make what I say LESS valid, should make it more so.
I have never seen a stock Vette go 12. I havent seen a lot of them run, but one ran a 13.8 as a best (I was racing him pretty much all night) and a few others in the low 13s.
A well driven older Z06 could run 11s, the new ones low 11s!
I have never seen a stock Vette go 12. I havent seen a lot of them run, but one ran a 13.8 as a best (I was racing him pretty much all night) and a few others in the low 13s.
A well driven older Z06 could run 11s, the new ones low 11s!
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
I run with Mustangs, so I see tons and tons of them... this is why I see 13s out of stockers, 12s out of bolt on cars, and all kinds of fast stuff. I dont see how that would make what I say LESS valid, should make it more so.
I have never seen a stock Vette go 12. I havent seen a lot of them run, but one ran a 13.8 as a best (I was racing him pretty much all night) and a few others in the low 13s.
A well driven older Z06 could run 11s, the new ones low 11s!
I have never seen a stock Vette go 12. I havent seen a lot of them run, but one ran a 13.8 as a best (I was racing him pretty much all night) and a few others in the low 13s.
A well driven older Z06 could run 11s, the new ones low 11s!
Theres actually a guy that has went into the 10's on just drag radials!
Sigh.....2 valves go high 13's driven hard. Not a hard concept to grasp. I just dont understand the "Superiority Complex" soooo many Mustang and f-body guys have over one another....
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: ludlow mass
Car: 02 Mustang
Engine: 3.8 about to be punched out to 4.3
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Detroit true trac
ive seen em go a little faster, never into the 13s though, unless your talkng about the s197s, its very rare to even hear of new edges breaking the 13s, and im the #6 poster on one of the worlds biggest mustang site and if you ask them, they would say it is rare for them to do 13s and conditions must be perfect
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
What is considered the worlds biggest Mustang site, and why would an Fbody guy be the number 3 poster?
Oh well not going to make non believers understand, so who really cares. If you think mid 14s, think mids 14s, and if I think high 13s, then Ill think high 13s!
Oh well not going to make non believers understand, so who really cares. If you think mid 14s, think mids 14s, and if I think high 13s, then Ill think high 13s!
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: ludlow mass
Car: 02 Mustang
Engine: 3.8 about to be punched out to 4.3
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Detroit true trac
im not brand loyal to anyone all cars have their perks and disadvantages why is a mustang owner on a third gen site?
im not thinking mid 13s, but times for an average driver in a new edge is low 14s, ya there is freaks that get 13s but its rare, unless its a 4V or s197
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Came here to help a cousin out with his car and stayed. As far as mid 13s, not for a new edge car, but 13.8-13.9 with a good driver isnt too hard to run. Our S197 went high 13s in crappy air with a passenger on the drivers first and only pass.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
http://www.mustangforums.com/ its number 6 not 3
Regarding the discussion at hand, yes, it's very possible, however, those who are skilled enough to put a 99 - 04 GT into the 13's stock are the same ones who rarely leave them stock for more than 1 or 2 track outings. I went 14.0 on the stock goodyears my 2nd time out in almost 1700' DA in my '02 GT. It took about 8 passes total to get there, but I never made another run on the stock tires after that. I'm pretty confident that in better air it would have been easily doable. It took a friend of mine probably 30 - 40 passes to get there, but he was running consistent 13.90's in his stock '00 GT. His is still stock to this day. Your average guy out there though, I'd think 14.2 - 14.4 is more realistic.
Last edited by Nic; Nov 13, 2006 at 04:43 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





