Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2010, 11:22 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Might be going against my buddy soon. Here is a break down of the cars. He says he is going to win from a dig, not sure about what he is putting down. I have also not dynoed my car yet with my new mods. Any input would be great.

MY Car:
LS1 WS6/Ram Air 6-speed manual
Pacesetter Long Tube Headers
Texas Speed 3" Catted Y Pipe
HighFlow Cats
Hooker catback
SLP Lid
K&N Filter
Prothane Motor Mounts




HIS Car:
L98 4 speed auto
Catback
Mild Cam (ZZ4 I think)
Ported stock heads

Last edited by 89IrocZ350TPI; 08-01-2010 at 01:33 PM.
Old 07-29-2010, 11:28 AM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

LS1 from a dig or a roll. The LS1 has it all over a L98 even with the cam change. LS1 is making more HP and Torque just about everywhere. Heck a stock LS1 would more than likely take that TPI.
Old 07-29-2010, 11:36 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

LS1, you've got him. Tell him to open up his wallet & put up or shut up!

Last edited by Stephen; 07-29-2010 at 11:46 AM. Reason: I totally misread & replied wrong the 1st time.
Old 07-29-2010, 11:45 AM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
87WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,565
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

The LS1 is going to win hands down. They are much faster cars to begin with and you've got more mods. The L98 only has a mild cam and even with tuning its not enough to take a stock LS1 based fourth gen. As has already been stated, if you've got a 3rd generation car with the LS1 engine in it then the beating will be even more pronounced. The third generation car is lighter and I believe they are slightly more aerodynamic.
Old 07-29-2010, 11:55 AM
  #5  
Senior Member

iTrader: (7)
 
budfreak1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toronto, Ohio
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1991 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 355
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 10 bolt 3.42 posi
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

I raced against (I'm assuming) a stock LS1 non WS6 convertible at the track and I had him for the first 30-40 feet and then he began to pull on me. I had all my current mods (check my cardomain) at the time except for the headers and Y pipe and I still had all emissions. The LS1 is going to win chances are though. As I recall he pulled a 13.9 and I pulled a 14.3 on that run.
Old 07-29-2010, 12:17 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
87WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,565
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by budfreak1
I raced against (I'm assuming) a stock LS1 non WS6 convertible at the track and I had him for the first 30-40 feet and then he began to pull on me. I had all my current mods (check my cardomain) at the time except for the headers and Y pipe and I still had all emissions. The LS1 is going to win chances are though. As I recall he pulled a 13.9 and I pulled a 14.3 on that run.
The L98 still has more off the line torque than the LS1 but the LS1 will catch and pass the L98 car before the run is over. So that result is what I assume to be typical even with some bolt-ons for each.
Old 07-29-2010, 12:26 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Good to hear because he seemed very confident he would beat me from a stop race.
Old 07-29-2010, 12:39 PM
  #8  
Member
 
NY3RDGEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

He's prob got a shot of the good stuff.. Who Knows??? If hes that confident.
Old 07-29-2010, 12:44 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

I've had both cars...stock L98, bolt on L98, stock LS1 auto, bolt on LS1 auto Still have the LS1 99 ta

Bone stock my TA with auto and 2.73 gear went 13.4 at 103. It took my L98 with slicks/converter/drag wheels/full bolt ons to get down that fast, and thats a 1.7x 60 foot compared to the LS1's 2.02.

SO the L98 needs a huge jump off the line to match the top end of a LS1. You got bolt ons which significantly add power so unless you cant drive/shift being a manual, theres no way that LS1 should lose.

I've run my bolt on L98 car against bolt on LT1's which at the time were running with stock LS1 6 spd cars, and they pulled me everytime. From rolls and dig, they had too much top end for the L98 with HSR intake. TPI makes it worse.
I've run 6sp LS2 GTO's which run on par with 6spd WS6's and they pulled me pretty hard from a 25 mph roll and I had the jump on him.
Old 07-29-2010, 12:49 PM
  #10  
Member
 
NY3RDGEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

This all also depends on the length of the race. 1/4 on the St? Light to light?


Orr, I thought the HSR gets a bolt on L98 to breath up top similar to an LT1.
Old 07-29-2010, 01:01 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
BigBadGTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 350TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:27
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

I have raced a non ram air ls1 trans am in my 88 L98 and I managed to stay pretty close. I have some basic little mods but its mostly stock. In your case with your ram air and mods you will kick his ***. race for money lol
Old 07-29-2010, 01:48 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
87WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,565
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

I think the point we are all trying to make is that unless he's done some serious work to the L98 or he's running nitrous there is no chance in hell that he can beat your LS1.
Old 07-29-2010, 02:11 PM
  #13  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
......Bone stock my TA with auto and 2.73 gear went 13.4 at 103. It took my L98 with slicks/converter/drag wheels/full bolt ons to get down that fast, and thats a 1.7x 60 foot compared to the LS1's 2.02......
Bone stock TA (305/350?...M5/700R4?...TPI/TBI/carb?), 2.73 & 13.4? And your saying you had to mod your L98 to get to the same time?
Old 07-29-2010, 02:22 PM
  #14  
Member
 
NY3RDGEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

The T/A is a 99 LS1 car.
Old 07-29-2010, 02:53 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Orr, I thought the HSR gets a bolt on L98 to breath up top similar to an LT1.
Similar yes, but same power, not even close. Bolt on LT1 cars make upwards of 315whp, depending. I think I've seen as high as 330 but cant be for sure. THAT is impressive for the heads/cam on those motors. Thats LS1 range. I know for sure I've seen a few dyno in the 280-300 range mainly stock with manual 6 trans or with catbacks/air intakes. Most of the auto cars i've seen dyno around 260-270. They arent that weak. They can push those heavier 4th gens into the mid high 13's stock well driven. 3/4 second or so faster than stock L98 times.

Full bolt on HSR type L98's should be in the 250-260's range thru the auto. LT1's have abit more head flow, abit more cam, and abit more compression to make more power.


Bone stock TA (305/350?...M5/700R4?...TPI/TBI/carb?), 2.73 & 13.4? And your saying you had to mod your L98 to get to the same time?
Sorry for the confusion. I was refering to my 99 trans am LS1 car. Non Ws6 with auto and 2.73 gear went 13.4's at 103. My HSR L98 with most all bolt ons and drag wheels would do 13.3-13.4 in same conditions at 101. Just no comparision in power between an LS1 and L98.


This all also depends on the length of the race. 1/4 on the St? Light to light?
I still think no matter what LS1 has this if you hold traction. The stock converter auto L98 has the advantage in that its easier to drive from a dig. It should beable to go WOT almost from the dead stop without spinning tire. M6 LS1 will have to feather out the hole to prevent tire spin and roll into the throttle. L98 has that advantage but once moving I dont think that advantage will hold weight. LS1 will be coming on strong.

My 99 auto 2.73 TA could go WOT from a dig and never spin tire. Even in the rain it had a chance to hook up but only would spin once rpms reached 2500-2800 where torque started coming on strong. It was stupid easy to drive and a great stoplight car. Light goes green, you just mash it and it goes without any problems. VERY CONSISTANT. I've ran that car 5 times at the track, 3 at 1/4 mile in PA and 2 at 1/8 mile in Texas and all ET's were within few hundredths. Amazing

In any case, i'd have to look at my old timeslips to compare 330 fts and 1/8 mile times, but I think the LS1 car bone stock had my L98 bolt on car beat at every point when comparing street tire 60 foot's. I was in the 1.9's with the L98 with 2800 stall on street tires compared to 2.02 on stock converter LS1 on street tires. I ran 8.80's in the 1/8 with the 99 ls1, which would normally be a high 13 second run, but top end was killer on the ls1 and it pulled 13.4's. 2.73 gears kills the bottom end on an LS1. 3.23 or higher gears and its getting worse for the L98.

Last edited by Orr89RocZ; 07-29-2010 at 02:57 PM.
Old 07-29-2010, 03:04 PM
  #16  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Zepher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Norfolk, VA. USA
Posts: 7,964
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 88 Formula
Engine: 95LT4, 305TPI
Transmission: T56, T5
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

If the L98 can hook, then you will be playing catch-up for a couple of hundred feet then you most likely will blow by him like he is standing still.

I know that my 88 Formula 305 5 speed takes a bone stock 02 WS6 6 speed out of the hole on street tires but the 02 catches up really quick.
(I drove this 02 WS6 at the track once and was able to get a 13.2@109mph. Never drove the car before and made 4 passes before the track closed for the night).

Also, my friend had a pretty much bone stock 91 GTA 350 Auto and with goodyear Eagle F1 Steel tires he had a hard time keeping the tires from smoking.
From a dig up to 40mph, anytime you mash the gas the tires would roast.
Old 07-29-2010, 03:11 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

From a dig up to 40mph, anytime you mash the gas the tires would roast.
My car when stock never could do that. Wish it had that kinda power but my street tires were good tires. Only on a dig when you brake stall as high as the stock converter could go and then mash it, it would start to light them up. Other wise for the most part it would hook and go. I had 2.77 gears. When i went to 3.27's and then 3.42's, I had a 2800 stall so apples to oranges.
Old 07-29-2010, 04:02 PM
  #18  
Member
 
NY3RDGEN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Trans Am, Corvette
Engine: LB9, LT1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60
Axle/Gears: 373, 259
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Odd, when my LB9 was BONE stock, It would light them up really well off the line just mashing the gas. Guess it depends on tune, TPS, Ect...
Old 07-29-2010, 04:16 PM
  #19  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by 87WS6
The L98 still has more off the line torque than the LS1 but the LS1 will catch and pass the L98 car before the run is over. So that result is what I assume to be typical even with some bolt-ons for each.
Funny how everybody says this but just about all the LS1's I've seen will run a better short time than a L98 IROC.

The L98 "feels" torquey but doesn't have it when it comes to actual times against an LS1. Even my heavy pig of a GTO would run sub 2.0 short times when it was stock. And that's giving up roughly 500 lbs over a 3rd gen.
Old 07-29-2010, 04:36 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
87WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,565
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1992 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305CID (LB9)
Transmission: World Class T5
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt, 4.10 gears
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by TTA 1387
Funny how everybody says this but just about all the LS1's I've seen will run a better short time than a L98 IROC.

The L98 "feels" torquey but doesn't have it when it comes to actual times against an LS1. Even my heavy pig of a GTO would run sub 2.0 short times when it was stock. And that's giving up roughly 500 lbs over a 3rd gen.
I think the main problem you get with the L98 is often traction. Deal with that and I think the low end torque of the L98 starts to come into play a lot more. Then again it still gets blown away by the LT1 and LS1 cars once they get moving.
Old 07-29-2010, 04:39 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

L98 TPI doesnt really have Low end, it has midrange which comes on strong but leading up to that and after that, its fairly weak.

My stock TPI L98 didnt 60 foot as well as the HSR L98 with same converter/gear. Curve was much flatter with the HSR. Maybe the 2800 didnt compliment TPI as much as it did HSR, but in my experience, the flatter TQ curves run better
Old 07-29-2010, 05:17 PM
  #22  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by 87WS6
I think the main problem you get with the L98 is often traction. Deal with that and I think the low end torque of the L98 starts to come into play a lot more. Then again it still gets blown away by the LT1 and LS1 cars once they get moving.
Best I've seen a stock L98 run was my buddy's, then new, 87 IROC. It went 14.3 back in 87. My 96 WS6 went 13.50 and my 04 GTO went 13.25, in 96 and 04 respectively. All were bone stock. The TPI just didn't cut the mustard at any point during the run. Off the line, it didn't matter. The LT1 and LS1 just outpower it everywhere.
Old 07-29-2010, 05:52 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Maybe I have a freak car because I hit a 12.8 with just exhaust and lid. Ill updated once I get back to the track. Hopefully I can improve a bit.
Old 07-29-2010, 08:17 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Depends on the race track, weather at the time of the run, and the state of the tune on the motor. Some motors from the factory were of tighter tolerances and ran stronger.

Air can make or break the run. My L98 was a 13.2 car in good air, 12.9 car in sealevel cold air, and 13.4's in summer warm/hot air on a good run. Turbo car went 9.8's in good cold air, and in 80 deg heat, i had to up the boost 2 psi and only got to 10.0's.

All makes a difference.
Old 07-29-2010, 10:01 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
86IrocLewie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 2800 Stall Converter SftKit
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Strange Engineering 12-Bolt
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

This one's been beaten to death, but everyone's been dead on. Your LS1 walks away with it easily unless if he's got more mods than he's told you about. If he doesn't have headers, he's not getting the full benefit of that exhaust or cam either. I agree with everyone else that you should try to get him to bet you some cash.

I used to teach high school English, and a lot of my students started getting into racing. They'd ask me questions all the time b/c my IROC is a daily driver, and they all saw it. I spent a lot of time debunking Fast and the Furious nonsense. My favorite discussion was with a V6 Mustang owner who swore he could take a WS6 T/A. I laughed, did some quick math and told him he'd lose by at least 13 car-lengths. He didn't believe it until they raced and got thoroughly stomped in front of tons of witnesses. I think some people think they could outrun a ZR1 in a garbage truck as long as they were driving.
Old 07-29-2010, 10:13 PM
  #26  
On Probation
 
89fbirdformula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula,1991 z28
Engine: 400 Vortec Hsr,496bbc
Transmission: TKO600,TH400
Axle/Gears: 9"4.10, 9"3.73
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
L98 TPI doesnt really have Low end, it has midrange which comes on strong but leading up to that and after that, its fairly weak.

My stock TPI L98 didnt 60 foot as well as the HSR L98 with same converter/gear. Curve was much flatter with the HSR. Maybe the 2800 didnt compliment TPI as much as it did HSR, but in my experience, the flatter TQ curves run better
my car made 299 rwhp/401rwtq...

hp peaked at 4400/tq peaked at 3400

Racing LS cars was fun

Best track pass as it just recently sat with STOCK tpi runners and stock tpi plenum/tb...it went 12.83 with a 2.0 sixty...

heres a shot from the track, gettin it done on 245 dunlops! this was my best 60, 1.8 something.


Last edited by 89fbirdformula; 07-29-2010 at 10:18 PM.
Old 07-29-2010, 10:48 PM
  #27  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Do you have a dyno graph? Curious as to the torque curve before and after the peak
Old 07-29-2010, 11:04 PM
  #28  
On Probation
 
89fbirdformula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula,1991 z28
Engine: 400 Vortec Hsr,496bbc
Transmission: TKO600,TH400
Axle/Gears: 9"4.10, 9"3.73
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
Do you have a dyno graph? Curious as to the torque curve before and after the peak
yeah i can upload it tomorrow, im over at the fiances house.

its pretty flat until around 4k where it starts to fall down, the HP is whats shitty...it dropped like a freakin ROCK after the peak, 299 at 4400, and i remember seeing 260s in the 4800+ range.
Old 07-30-2010, 04:52 AM
  #29  
Junior Member
 
86IrocLewie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 2800 Stall Converter SftKit
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Strange Engineering 12-Bolt
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

89fbirdformula, That's a great-looking Formula. Nice track numbers too.

Originally Posted by 89fbirdformula
my car made 299 rwhp/401rwtq...

hp peaked at 4400/tq peaked at 3400

Racing LS cars was fun

Best track pass as it just recently sat with STOCK tpi runners and stock tpi plenum/tb...it went 12.83 with a 2.0 sixty...

heres a shot from the track, gettin it done on 245 dunlops! this was my best 60, 1.8 something.

Old 07-30-2010, 05:11 AM
  #30  
On Probation
 
89fbirdformula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 Formula,1991 z28
Engine: 400 Vortec Hsr,496bbc
Transmission: TKO600,TH400
Axle/Gears: 9"4.10, 9"3.73
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by 86IrocLewie
89fbirdformula, That's a great-looking Formula. Nice track numbers too.
thank you very much, its gone 11.29@127 on the spray..

i have a build thread in the power adder forum i beleive it is, cars going single turbo with HSR..
Old 07-30-2010, 07:14 AM
  #31  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by 86IrocLewie
This one's been beaten to death, but everyone's been dead on. Your LS1 walks away with it easily unless if he's got more mods than he's told you about. If he doesn't have headers, he's not getting the full benefit of that exhaust or cam either. I agree with everyone else that you should try to get him to bet you some cash.

I used to teach high school English, and a lot of my students started getting into racing. They'd ask me questions all the time b/c my IROC is a daily driver, and they all saw it. I spent a lot of time debunking Fast and the Furious nonsense. My favorite discussion was with a V6 Mustang owner who swore he could take a WS6 T/A. I laughed, did some quick math and told him he'd lose by at least 13 car-lengths. He didn't believe it until they raced and got thoroughly stomped in front of tons of witnesses. I think some people think they could outrun a ZR1 in a garbage truck as long as they were driving.
Ill prob go to the track with him. Also what was the V6 owners argument?
Old 07-30-2010, 09:47 AM
  #32  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Well I just got back from the Dyno Jet. The car put down 354rwh and 363rwt after the tune. Overall Im happy with the numbers. My friend didnt go but he said he is putting down more torque than me and thats why he would beat me in a 1/8 race. Guess we will see.
Old 07-30-2010, 02:26 PM
  #33  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

I dont think he would be putting down more peak torque than that on a mild cammed L98 but hard to say. Even if he does have more peak, you have more average tq and 100hp more. Thats enough to gain 8-10mph on the trap speed over him. I dont see an 1/8 mile race being any better for the L98
Old 07-30-2010, 06:07 PM
  #34  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
I dont think he would be putting down more peak torque than that on a mild cammed L98 but hard to say. Even if he does have more peak, you have more average tq and 100hp more. Thats enough to gain 8-10mph on the trap speed over him. I dont see an 1/8 mile race being any better for the L98
Orr do those numbers seem accurate for my mods? I was actually a bit surprised and was expecting less.

Im not sure what he would dyno. I remember my bolt on l98 putting down 245/326. The dyno chart is on here somewhere I posted it like 4 years ago I believe. With his mods im sure he would have more than that. Maybe more torque off the line but less over the entire power band id assume.
Old 07-30-2010, 09:24 PM
  #35  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Yeah your numbers are pretty good. I've seen a few bolt on cars in the 335-340whp range with 6 spd around me, and I've seen one with all the major bolt ons making 351whp. Thats about right for those mods. LS1's usually have near same tq and hp, with slightly more torque.

My bolt on L98 with HSR intake was 254whp/315wtq. I do not think TPI made more than 330-340wtq when stock. Aftermarket TPI may beable to make more than that, not sure. I just know this local guys 88 firebird with all bolt ons with TPI ran about on part with my bolt on L98 with HSR.
Old 07-31-2010, 07:24 AM
  #36  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
I do not think TPI made more than 330-340wtq when stock.
That was engine torque, not wheel torque. There wasn't a TPI that made that much torque when stock.

If I remember right, 245/345 was the best rated TPI.

Last edited by TTA 1387; 07-31-2010 at 07:27 AM.
Old 07-31-2010, 09:49 AM
  #37  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
Yeah your numbers are pretty good. I've seen a few bolt on cars in the 335-340whp range with 6 spd around me, and I've seen one with all the major bolt ons making 351whp. Thats about right for those mods. LS1's usually have near same tq and hp, with slightly more torque.

My bolt on L98 with HSR intake was 254whp/315wtq. I do not think TPI made more than 330-340wtq when stock. Aftermarket TPI may beable to make more than that, not sure. I just know this local guys 88 firebird with all bolt ons with TPI ran about on part with my bolt on L98 with HSR.
I bet on a mustang dyno though my numbers would be closer to 330ish.
Old 07-31-2010, 12:15 PM
  #38  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by TTA 1387
That was engine torque, not wheel torque. There wasn't a TPI that made that much torque when stock.

If I remember right, 245/345 was the best rated TPI.
I"m talking about real dyno numbers tho. Stock they are rated at 245/345 but they put down more than what the ratings say. I"ve seen vette L98 put down 230whp stock, i forget the torque, but they were rated the same 245-250hp depending on the year. Only 20hp lost thru the drivetrain? I doubt it.
Old 08-01-2010, 03:19 PM
  #39  
Member

 
danziger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

It isn't going to be much of a race after the first 50 feet or so. I have/had examples of both from stock to fully-modded and the LS1 will own the L98 in every possible metric mod-for-mod. Unless he is seriously lying about his level of modification, he doesn't have a prayer.
Old 08-01-2010, 05:45 PM
  #40  
Senior Member

 
TTA 1387's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
I"m talking about real dyno numbers tho. Stock they are rated at 245/345 but they put down more than what the ratings say. I"ve seen vette L98 put down 230whp stock, i forget the torque, but they were rated the same 245-250hp depending on the year. Only 20hp lost thru the drivetrain? I doubt it.
I remember seeing 195rwhp and 175rwhp for TPI's back in the late 90's at the dyno day we had in VA. Both cars were low mileage stock Camaro's, one a 350 and the other was a 305.

Maybe both of them were on the low side but we figured it was about right given the losses in the drivetrain vs GM ratings. Never did see a TPI put up that much on a dyno that was supposed to be stock.
Old 08-03-2010, 11:01 AM
  #41  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Update results

Finally got a chance to run.

First run DIG: I launched at about 2300 with no wheel spin. Pulled about a car on him off the line but he stayed right with me until I hit the top of second gear where I took about three 1/2 cars on him. I shut down at the top of third at about 95 and didnt look back.

Second run ROLL: 40 mph roll which I started in second gear. I pulled on him much harder this time and shut down at the top of third again. I think his car is tired with 180,000 miles on it vs my 29,000 mile ls1. I think a tune would put him closer.
Old 08-03-2010, 03:45 PM
  #42  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (20)
 
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 25,751
Received 369 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Update results

A tune isnt going to give that motor 100 hp it needs to hang.
Old 08-03-2010, 05:33 PM
  #43  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: Update results

Originally Posted by Orr89RocZ
A tune isnt going to give that motor 100 hp it needs to hang.
I just meant I dont think its running 100 percent.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
05-10-2023 07:19 PM
Orr89RocZ
Power Adders
206
04-25-2016 08:28 AM
smokingss
LSX and LTX Parts
2
03-03-2016 07:40 PM
zayne0
Camaros for Sale
0
08-24-2015 07:22 PM



Quick Reply: LS1 WS6 vs 88 Trans am



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.