timing issues
timing issues
just wondering how far i can go with the timing, i called SDPC and they suggested 10*base. Of course I tried for more, I had it as high as 14* and didn't hear any pinging. It's now at 10 but felt alot stronger with more. Is the higher number safe? thanks for any help. Also, as I read the posts I see people get upset when the "search" is not used, hope I'm not going against the grain here
help using this option would be appreciated as well
help using this option would be appreciated as well Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Hook up a scan tool and see what kind of knock counts you're getting. The knock sensor system in your car will probably prevent you from hearing any knock at all but it still may be happening. Once the KS hears "knock" it pulls enough timing to quench the detonation and then pulls some more timimg for good measure. I noticed in a previous thread that you're using Vortec heads. They don't like a whole lot of timing from what I understand.
I can gaurentee that nobody will run the "do a search" BS here on the Ontario board. If you have a question, run it up the pole. Somebody will answer it
I can gaurentee that nobody will run the "do a search" BS here on the Ontario board. If you have a question, run it up the pole. Somebody will answer it
thanks
woah!!! i'm glad i pulled it back. i was under the impression there would be no detonation with the ks. I have a slight back fire on decelleration and thought it was do to timing. i set it to factory spec and still had the same problem. my cat is gone and most of my pollution controll system and i still have the same prom. could that be the problem?(need calibration for these mods)
so your saying not to advance the timing with out changing chip? I see in all the mags and hear of people advancing the timing for performance gains all the time. No mention of recalibration. I know from 6 degrees to 10 degrees is a nice diffrence in performance
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
well since you d/c the computer when setting base timing I'd assume it will just give the same curve as before but with +X timing at any given point correct?
Originally posted by RegaPlanet
well since you d/c the computer when setting base timing I'd assume it will just give the same curve as before but with +X timing at any given point correct?
well since you d/c the computer when setting base timing I'd assume it will just give the same curve as before but with +X timing at any given point correct?
Trending Topics
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Acceld Z does make a very valid point tho. Your knock sensor may very well hear knock long before you do and retard timing so for best results a scan tool would be the only way to know 100%. But of course you could always run the car down the track also or possibly feel the gains via SOTP in some situations.
EDIT: Why would the TPS need to be adjusted each time you change your timing?
EDIT: Why would the TPS need to be adjusted each time you change your timing?
Last edited by RegaPlanet; Jun 2, 2003 at 03:57 PM.
Originally posted by RegaPlanet
Acceld Z does make a very valid point tho. Your knock sensor may very well hear knock long before you do and retard timing so for best results a scan tool would be the only way to know 100%. But of course you could always run the car down the track also or possibly feel the gains via SOTP in some situations.
EDIT: Why would the TPS need to be adjusted each time you change your timing?
Acceld Z does make a very valid point tho. Your knock sensor may very well hear knock long before you do and retard timing so for best results a scan tool would be the only way to know 100%. But of course you could always run the car down the track also or possibly feel the gains via SOTP in some situations.
EDIT: Why would the TPS need to be adjusted each time you change your timing?
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
From: Ontario
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 406
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
idle is set via the IAC... if your tps is off after you just set it a day or week or even month ago its probably on its way out and needs to be replaced would be my thinking on that. I dont see any reason the tps will change when you adjust timing.
Originally posted by RegaPlanet
idle is set via the IAC... if your tps is off after you just set it a day or week or even month ago its probably on its way out and needs to be replaced would be my thinking on that. I dont see any reason the tps will change when you adjust timing.
idle is set via the IAC... if your tps is off after you just set it a day or week or even month ago its probably on its way out and needs to be replaced would be my thinking on that. I dont see any reason the tps will change when you adjust timing.
Last edited by blueandwhite; Jun 2, 2003 at 05:19 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
Sep 17, 2020 08:26 AM




