Third Gen Association of Ontario Regional message board for everyone in Southern Ontario and nearby regions.

thoughts, opinions needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 08:47 PM
  #1  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
thoughts, opinions needed

i am seriously considering purchasing an 82 trans am. it is red with some black stripping along the bottom of the body.
it has 86 000 kms. it has a sunroof, A/C, manual locks, manual windows, rear defrost. no cruise control, no rear wiper. it has these tan leather seats with PMD (Pontiac Motor Department, i assume) badges on them. the interior has tan carpeting and black accents (dash, door handles, console, etc).

the body is absouletly rust free, very good condition. the car has never been winter driven. it has the non-functioning cowl induction hood.

drivetrain wise, the car has the LG4 and the TH200c 3 speed auto. it has a drum brake rear end with a 10-bolt posi. not sure of the gear ratio.

the car is originallly from the states and as a result is has the computer controlled q-jet and distributor, and the smog pump/AIR system.

the guy is asking around 4500 certified. i took the car for a spin today and she drives and stops nice, everythign seems tight. it appears the only thing it will need for certification is 2 new rear tires.

what do you guys think? is the price reasonable. its seems little high to me, but i am cheap. overall the car is in great shape, but slow as hell.

any comments, criticizims, suggestions are welcome...thanks guys.

Last edited by darbleinad; Jul 13, 2003 at 08:55 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 09:35 PM
  #2  
George's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Stouffville, Ontario
Car: 83WS6TA
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: TH350C
Axle/Gears: 3:23
I think $4000 would be good for that car.

86K is nothing and there can't be a lot of 1982s available in such good shape.

T-tops and an ECM would not be my first choice but it'd be nice to have that one around as an extra car for the summer.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 09:37 PM
  #3  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
thanks for the reply,

but actually is a real deal sunroof, not t-tops. and yes i know the difference. hehhe. my 84 has t-tops.


yeah, for an 82 it is in great shape. the real negative for me is the fact it is from the US. i dislike computers and smog pumps.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2003 | 09:49 PM
  #4  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
george, did your 83 originally have the th200c before you swapped in the th350? how long did the th200c last?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 06:11 AM
  #5  
Daz's Avatar
Daz
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 0
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: Chevy V8
Transmission: auto
The only desirable thing that I can think off is the body and the seats.I haf an 82Z28 and the TH200 have to be replaced twice before I switched to a TH350 from a 78 Camaro.If you want it as a collector, the sunroof kinda ruined it(IMO)

Pros
mileage
seats
condition(body and interior)

Cons
price
sunroof
engine(not too much)
tranny
no power options

Daz
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 08:38 AM
  #6  
George's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Stouffville, Ontario
Car: 83WS6TA
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: TH350C
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Mine was a 200C and it lasted 160K before I changed it. I abused it a fair bit - downshifted to 2nd at 50mph going into corners and sometimes down into first while coming out of slow corners.

Not a great tranny but I felt it didn't owe me anything at the end. I think 1st in the 200 is lower that 1st in the 350 and my car has 3:23s so it wasn't to bad with just an LG4 in it.

As for the price I tend to think that anything in good shape which has an 8 in it and runs well is worth a certain amount so I might be a bit off with respect to market value on that one.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 11:20 AM
  #7  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by Daz
The only desirable thing that I can think off is the body and the seats.I haf an 82Z28 and the TH200 have to be replaced twice before I switched to a TH350 from a 78 Camaro.If you want it as a collector, the sunroof kinda ruined it(IMO)

Pros
mileage
seats
condition(body and interior)

Cons
price
sunroof
engine(not too much)
tranny
no power options

Daz
Daz,

i basically agree with you on those pros and cons daz, except that i like the no power options, less stuff to break. i have been reading and the shorttail th350 has the same dimensions, meaning the stock drive shaft will work if i feel like switching.

George,

sounds like you got some decent use out of that original tranny. the guy said it has been rebuilt once, so i guess that can be seen as a pro and a con. i dont plan on doing much to this car if i get it, so hopefully the th200c would hold up for awhile.

keep the comments and suggestions coming fellas
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #8  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
well gentlemen,

i just got off the phone with the guy. he will take 4300 cert or 4000 as is. i know it needs to rear tires. probably not too much else. thankfully he still has it licensed and he said i can take it to my friends garage so i can take a look at it.

you guys think 4000 is good price or still to steep?
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 11:46 AM
  #9  
Eric2ndGen's Avatar
Senior Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
From: Out There->
For a car that has never seen winter- and you verify it's totally rust-free by hoisting it and pulling a few trim items out of the way- what do you want for $4500.00?

If it had NO drivetrain- I'd think the seller would have to get less than that- but the fact that it moves under its own power jacks it up a bit- despite the fact it's only a LG4 w/200c and likely lower rear gears (i.e. 2.xx).

You like it and it's drivable and you have the $4500.00? Buy it and start saving your pennies for upgrades- starting with the transmission when it finally blows.

The bigger concern in my mind these days with the older vehicles is the insurance a-holes not wanting to insure anything more than about 10 years old without you having to bend over- and then if you want it insured for it's actual value and not the $800.00 they offer if it's ever written off- you better hope they work it in slow- no lube's gonna hurt.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 11:46 AM
  #10  
George's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Stouffville, Ontario
Car: 83WS6TA
Engine: ZZ4
Transmission: TH350C
Axle/Gears: 3:23
Rebuilt once with only 86K isn't so great - have to wonder why - but there's always some risk and if it shifts OK and the fluid is good then it's probably going to last for a while behind that motor.

TH350 swap is easy and relatively cheap, but as you know, you need the torque arm mount. I think Kevs87TA might have one.

I agree about power options - especially on an older car - they're just something else to go wrong.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 01:36 PM
  #11  
johnyIROC's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,364
Likes: 4
From: London, Ontario, CANADA
I replied to the post on SOGM....

And as for the tranny, my '83 was replaced with a TH350 before I got it because the 200 went mush. But a TH350 is basically a bolt-in.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 03:50 PM
  #12  
Acceld Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
You can have my GTA for $2000
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 03:56 PM
  #13  
trigger GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener ont
Car: 92 TA vert
Engine: LS1
Originally posted by Acceld Z
You can have my GTA for $2000

if you gave me that price before i bougth my 86 i would have taken it
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:07 PM
  #14  
Acceld Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Originally posted by trigger GTA
if you gave me that price before i bougth my 86 i would have taken it
I thought I did. Besides, you already have one just like it.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 04:16 PM
  #15  
trigger GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,627
Likes: 2
From: Kitchener ont
Car: 92 TA vert
Engine: LS1
no the price you gave me was much higher and i dont mind having 2


Brad its your cash do what you want if you like it get it
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 05:14 PM
  #16  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by Eric2ndGen
For a car that has never seen winter- and you verify it's totally rust-free by hoisting it and pulling a few trim items out of the way- what do you want for $4500.00?

If it had NO drivetrain- I'd think the seller would have to get less than that- but the fact that it moves under its own power jacks it up a bit- despite the fact it's only a LG4 w/200c and likely lower rear gears (i.e. 2.xx).

You like it and it's drivable and you have the $4500.00? Buy it and start saving your pennies for upgrades- starting with the transmission when it finally blows.

The bigger concern in my mind these days with the older vehicles is the insurance a-holes not wanting to insure anything more than about 10 years old without you having to bend over- and then if you want it insured for it's actual value and not the $800.00 they offer if it's ever written off- you better hope they work it in slow- no lube's gonna hurt.

yeah i have the cash. his original asking price was 5000 cert and 4700 as is, so at least i have got him down a bit. as for insurance, my 84 costs me less than 1100 a year. this is just the basic liability. hopefully the insurance on this thing wouldnt be to much more for full coverage.
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2003 | 05:37 PM
  #17  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
well i just got a quote from my insurance company.

1053.31 for the year for liability and comprehensive (fire, theft, etc) or 1273.31 for liability, comprehensive, and collision.

so insurance seems to be semi-reasonable for me, seeing as i am only 21.

Last edited by darbleinad; Jul 14, 2003 at 05:45 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 02:46 PM
  #18  
Pacer's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Car: 82 Camaro Pace Car & 1989 IROC
Engine: LG4. & 350 TPI
Transmission: 200C
Sounds like a fair deal.
I agree with Daz and others on the Pros & Cons given that mine's an 82 also.
I would only add that modding that thing will drop it's value and you're better off finding a later Third gen for that. It will be a money pit to get the LG4 to perform.
Enjoy as is, just do the tranny if needed.

Pacer
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 04:45 PM
  #19  
Cruz'N Bruz'R's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 383ci.
Transmission: WC-T5
I'm personally not a fan of pre 85 thirdgens. Though $4500 sounds like a good deal for a car thats in good physical shape, remember, performance wise, you pretty much have nothing to work with and have to start from fresh.

Though that shouldn't be too hard. I hear your little 355 runs well.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2003 | 09:13 PM
  #20  
darbleinad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
From: Ailsa Craig, Ontario, Canada
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700r4
Originally posted by Pacer
Sounds like a fair deal.
I agree with Daz and others on the Pros & Cons given that mine's an 82 also.
I would only add that modding that thing will drop it's value and you're better off finding a later Third gen for that. It will be a money pit to get the LG4 to perform.
Enjoy as is, just do the tranny if needed.

Pacer
jason and i went to look at it last night again and i drove it again, a little harder this time and she shifts crisp and drives nice. as for modding this car, i dont have any plans for that....i have modded an LG4 already...
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2003 | 10:29 PM
  #21  
Agent13's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 13
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1983 Daytona Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I say you should buy it! Pre '85 T/A's are the best. My suggestion is that you keep it all original. 1982 T/A's in good condition are very hard to find.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CarGuyDennis
Organized Drag Racing and Autocross
137
Dec 6, 2016 11:02 PM
IROCZ1989
North East Region
7
Jan 24, 2016 03:55 PM
kitt23
Exterior Parts Wanted
2
Aug 15, 2015 12:37 PM
86camaroman201
Fabrication
0
Aug 11, 2015 10:39 PM
GEmrsn
Interior Parts Wanted
3
Aug 8, 2015 03:15 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.