TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

did i choose the right cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 12, 2004 | 09:44 PM
  #1  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
did i choose the right cam?

Hey everyone, here is what my setup consists of:
400 .030 over
9.6:1 CR
Edelbrock RPM heads
SLP 1 3/4 headers
3in edelbrock cat back
LT1 intake
24lb injectors

now here's the important part
i purchased a 2050 compucam
Specifications:
* Advertised duration: 272 intake/284 exhaust
* Duration at .050 in. cam lift: 216 intake/228 exhaust
* Gross valve lift: .454 in. intake/.480 in. exhaust
* Lobe separation: 112 degrees
* RPM range: 2,200 to 5,200
* Must use adjustable fuel pressure regulator.
* Good mid and top end torque and horsepower.
* Axle ratios of 3.73 or numerically higher recommended

and i also have 1.6 rockers.
now i was wondering is this not enough cam for mysetup or is it too much? i dont want to go over 5500 with this engine and its my street car. im wondering this because i have about 3100 miles on the car since i put the motor in and a cam lobe wore off of it and im wondering if i should purchase a different cam or just get the same thing? i would like to get a roller cam setup but the cost might be out of my league
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 01:42 AM
  #2  
cali92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro, Ca
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
That is an awfully mild cam for a 400.
Damn, thats a mild cam for a 350.
How did the cam lobe wear only after 3100 miles?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2004 | 02:40 AM
  #3  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
non proper brake in period......
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 03:03 AM
  #4  
jfreeman74's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
From: Flowery Branch, GA
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 1 BA 305 TPI
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 - 2800 Stall Midwest
Axle/Gears: 3.42
That would be a good cam for a 305. WAY too mild for a 400.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 04:18 AM
  #5  
IROCZ4BD3's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: Oaks,Pa
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: modified 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
that is a really mild cam for a 400 as compared to the one I used in my 305.See sig.
BD3
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 05:14 AM
  #6  
FBodesigner's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: I am all around you...even now...actually Japan, but don't tell anyone, it's a secret
Car: 90'300ZX/87'Formula (In Storage)
Engine: 300ZX:3.0LTT/Formula:5.0L
Transmission: 300ZX:Manual 5SPD/Formula:700R-4
I don't know if anyone has mentioned this yet, but that is a very mild cam for a 400...

My advice...call compucam, tell their tech support what your setup is and they will be able to suggest a good cam for you. Also, if you have the money for a roller cam, spring for it!!!

Did I mention that is a mild cam for a 400...sorry couldn't help it .
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 08:25 AM
  #7  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
lol iv got a roller setup now, i dont know all the specs on it but ill find out this week.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 06:36 PM
  #8  
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
I agree for a flat tappet cam that is on the to small side. Now if that was a roller cam I would say the duration would not be to bad for a street machine but the lift should be around .525" or higher. There is an interesting theory floating around about a "small" cam with a high lift for a street car. You still get the good low end torque of the small cam but still get some good flow with the high lift. Allen
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 06:51 PM
  #9  
OMINOUS_87's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,824
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ: Transplanted from Chicago, IL
small
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 09:21 PM
  #10  
SweetS10v8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
Car: '89 Formula 350 & '86 Z28
Engine: L98 & 355ci
Transmission: 700r4 in both
Its small for your 400, remember your extra cubic inches allow you to go bigger with less ill effects. But I think the Edelbrock RPM heads are the thing to be worried about more.

Your 400 needs flow to make HP. Your setup for TQ not HP. The setup you have with 166cc or so intake runners along with a mild cam should make an awesome street machine, but probably suffers in the upper rpm range.

Just thinking about it a little more, you have a small intake port with lots of velocity, a cam with no overlap, and slowed exhaust velocity because of larger headers. Again a great street motor, but a few simple changes would make it a high(er) HP engine.

It all depends on how you want it...

Last edited by SweetS10v8; Jun 14, 2004 at 09:26 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2004 | 10:44 PM
  #11  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
you are right on that, i just wanted something very streetable, but im beggining to encounter faster cars on the road so i gotta step up a little, i might in the near futur get some AFR 190's or something like that but not sure. its all about budget.... the car pulls pretty hard for the setup that i have, i could almost hold my own vs. a 2004 SVT cobra...so i dont know, im pretty happy, maybe ill have to look at some kind of power adder....
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 12:36 AM
  #12  
cali92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro, Ca
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
With a real cam and those AFR's (however i would go with the AFR 210 with a 400), u should pretty much smoke any cobra out there
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 02:15 AM
  #13  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
i also was refering to the cobra that is supercharged.....stock 12.6's..... also, took my parts off my car, last took the intake off... i couldnt beleive what i saw...... a pushrod was bent ...looked about 150degree's instead of 180(straight line) and about 5-6 lobes wore off the cam almost half of the rockers were loose, i guess when the cam wanted to go it made sure it went.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 07:30 AM
  #14  
CashMunson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
i pulled one out of my motor just like that

http://www.angelfire.com/scary/cashm...s/Image055.jpg

you definitely need a cam in the lift range of high 500's or low 600's, and go with AFR 210's like cali92rs said.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 09:29 AM
  #15  
cali92RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
From: San Pedro, Ca
Car: White KSwisses
Engine: 5.3L Gen III
Originally posted by TPIMarow6.6
i also was refering to the cobra that is supercharged.....stock 12.6's.....
Dude, 12.6 is extremely easy with a 400.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 09:44 AM
  #16  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
that pushrod you showed is hardly bent compaired to this one....ill take a pic and post it. it was bent too bad to get it out of the hole without hamering with it a little and as you say a 600 lift cam in my mind is way too much to run as a daily driver...
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 10:08 AM
  #17  
daxfas26's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: tyler
Car: cobalt ss/sc, 91 z28, 92 z28
Engine: 385 stroker
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 10 bolt 3.73
I agree 600 lift would be overkill for a dailydriver with dependablity factor. and i dont think it will work wth those heads either. if u got new heads yes. I say call compcams and ask them thier opinion. Go with a cam that will go to 6000rpms and around 525 lift with 1.6 rockers on intake side. I think that would be ideal. and You would be able to dust those new cobras without any problems and not sacraficing dependablity. Since your car is a daily driver this is off the subject but does it overheat in traffic? stop and go traffic? mine did and I hated it. If yours didnt then whats your secret? later man
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 10:17 AM
  #18  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
no it didnt over heat, i only have 9.6:1 CR and stock coolant system but the steam holes are drilled in the edelbrock heads, but other than that, i dont have any problems, maybe the heads help with cooling it. if anything ill take these heads off and send them to a guy in VT and he's really good at porting, and id have him open them up a little bit. i know i can get a roller cam with i think 525/560ish lift...but that is a little high for me.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 11:13 AM
  #19  
CashMunson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
daxfas my old trans am used to do that alot and my new one does it some but not as bad, it's a real common problem with them since they have no grill to get air to the radiator. I removed my ac condensor and made my own little scoop under the car and it worked great.

http://www.angelfire.com/scary/cashm.../air_damn1.jpg

You could also try water wetter. it works good from what i hear but i've never tried it myself.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 03:47 PM
  #20  
Twilightoptics's Avatar
Supreme Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, Washington
Car: '87 IROC-Z/'82 RX7
Engine: SBC 355/1.1L Rotary
Transmission: T56/5 Speed
Axle/Gears: 4.33/3.93
You might want to check your pushrod geometery while you are at it. Every cam is different.

Yeah that's a mild cam for a 400, but as you stated which hasn't been addressed, you don't want to spin past 5500.

I'd go with the next step or two up from that cam. Something like a 224/230ish range. Make sure you degree it!

If I had the engine built for some RPM abuse... I'd go with something more like a 245/253. My 355 has a 239/247 but it goes to 7k. A general rule is the same cam in a smaller engine will act bigger, and vise versa. So the 216 you have now might be good for a 327, but it acts alot smaller in relation to a 400.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 05:51 PM
  #21  
Grumpy's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,554
Likes: 1
From: In reality
Car: An Ol Buick
Engine: Vsick
Transmission: Janis Tranny Yank Converter
That cam might be kinda on the small side

One way to look at is you have about 15% more CID to fill. So unless you increase the valve size/lift/duration by that amount, you still only breaking even.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 11:47 PM
  #22  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
heres a pic of the pushrod that bent when the cam lobes went...
Attached Thumbnails did i choose the right cam?-im000778.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2004 | 11:51 PM
  #23  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
also about the cam i was thinking something decent for the car would be 480-510 and 1.6 rockers would be decent, considering the "rpm package" cam is .488 .510 234/244ish i think
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #24  
CashMunson's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Ravenna, Ohio
Car: 87 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 408 LS
Transmission: LS 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt/3.70 Gears/TAP Girdle
haha wow that pushrod is definitely bent to hell. you break em like I do
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 12:20 PM
  #25  
RednGold86Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 1
From: Corona
Car: 92 Form, 91 Z28, 89 GTA, 86 Z28
Engine: BP383 vortech, BP383, 5.7 TPI, LG4
Transmission: 4L60e, 700R4, 700R4..
Axle/Gears: 3.27, 2.73
I guess I'm missing something here: Why would a worn down lobe bend a pushrod? The only thing I can think of that'll do that is cheesy pushrods on stiff springs in an overrev or a bent (stuck) valve.

That cam probably would make a good daily driver, not sure how it matches the LT1 intake on a 400 though. You should dyno it and find out! The RPM heads have 170 cc intakes out of the box (close to vortec or LT1's), so I would guess it'll all come together like a slightly cammed/headered 400 LT1, so maybe 360 hp - 420 ft-lbs?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 12:49 PM
  #26  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
well what i suspect is improper oiling to the lifters, so there goes cam lobes,non pumped up lifters=alot of slack in the valve train.....thats how it came about to a bent pushrod.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 04:25 PM
  #27  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
well i got my cam, its a crane 119631 .509/.528 222/230 with crane roller lifters and crane pushrods....hopefully itll run good.here's a link to the cam http://www.cranecams.com/index.php?s...31&lvl=2&prt=5
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 01:20 PM
  #28  
daxfas26's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: tyler
Car: cobalt ss/sc, 91 z28, 92 z28
Engine: 385 stroker
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: stock 10 bolt 3.73
I think that was a good choice. It should make up that extra 15% that grumpy mentioned. Let us know how that goes!!!
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 06:11 PM
  #29  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
Ill def. fill you guys in on what happens, i should have the motor back in by the end of the week. i think this cam might be right but what would .509/.528 be with 1.6 rockers?
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #30  
SweetS10v8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
Car: '89 Formula 350 & '86 Z28
Engine: L98 & 355ci
Transmission: 700r4 in both
Originally posted by TPIMarow6.6
Ill def. fill you guys in on what happens, i should have the motor back in by the end of the week. i think this cam might be right but what would .509/.528 be with 1.6 rockers?
Typically you can just add .030 lift when swapping from 1.5 to 1.6(close enough generally)

To do it the right way you take your original number .509/.528 and divide them by your rocker ratio(1.5) and you get lift at the cam, which is .3393/.352. then you multiply them by hte ratio of your new rockers(1.6) which equals .543/.563
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 07:44 PM
  #31  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
lol thanks for the calculations. that shouldnt be too high should it....
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #32  
SweetS10v8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
Car: '89 Formula 350 & '86 Z28
Engine: L98 & 355ci
Transmission: 700r4 in both
Only way to tell is to put clay on top of your pistons and roll over the motor. Im almost positive you need .100" clearance. Make sure you buy the matching springs too.

With some decent tires, and a 2500 or so converter you should be high 12s @ ~103-105mph

Im assuming many things though....lol
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #33  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
thats what im planning, i have a 5-speed which most likely is going to give out sometime in the near future, but i try to not to be hard on it. i can get some slicks from my cousin for 50 bucks. but that would put more pressure on the tranny. i just need some funding for my 6-speed lol oh, and im not worried about it hitting the piston, i have a slight dish on them.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 07:10 AM
  #34  
my3rdgen's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Dixon IL
Car: 2013 Challenger RT
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 6 spd
Axle/Gears: 3:92
Originally posted by TPIMarow6.6
thats what im planning, i have a 5-speed which most likely is going to give out sometime in the near future, but i try to not to be hard on it. i can get some slicks from my cousin for 50 bucks. but that would put more pressure on the tranny. i just need some funding for my 6-speed lol oh, and im not worried about it hitting the piston, i have a slight dish on them.
With 1.6 rockers your exhaust lift will be around .563. I'd check it.

I built my 355 with Speed Pro pistons that have a .125 dome. I am running a Comp Cam 280H cam that has .480 lift that is actually .512 with my 1.6 to 1 roller rockers. The heads have 2.02/1.60 valves, and 76cc chambers.

I asked the guy at the engine shop if I should check the clearence when I put the engine together, he said that if I was running a cam with lift up near .525 - .550 he would check it, but otherwise it wouldn't be a concern. I just got the motor started last week and it is fine. Some of the lifters need re-adjusted but other than that it is OK.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 10:35 AM
  #35  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
well iv got dish pistons in my car but i did check the lift on what it was supposed to be plus it was posted as well, my springs on my edelbrock heads are supposed to be rated to .575 lift. so that is kind of cutting it close but as for clearance, i highly doubt ill have a problem but if worse comes to worse, ill turn the motor over by hand to see if it hits. i just hope the cam isnt too big for the motor.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2004 | 11:22 AM
  #36  
SweetS10v8's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
From: Lima, OH
Car: '89 Formula 350 & '86 Z28
Engine: L98 & 355ci
Transmission: 700r4 in both
Originally posted by SweetS10v8
Only way to tell is to put clay on top of your pistons and roll over the motor. Im almost positive you need .100" clearance.
To quote a wise man....lol

Dished or not, they still have valve notches cut in them, most likely. And it might not hit rolling it over by hand, but things change when it warms up. Thats where .100 comes into play

Last edited by SweetS10v8; Jun 23, 2004 at 11:25 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Prodigious
Theoretical and Street Racing
35
Apr 13, 2021 02:37 PM
Jorlain
Tech / General Engine
6
Oct 8, 2015 01:57 AM
customblackbird
Power Adders
71
Oct 1, 2015 04:30 PM
Strick1
LTX and LSX
2
Sep 4, 2015 07:11 AM
z28guy134
Engine Swap
1
Sep 1, 2015 11:50 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:51 PM.