V6 t5 behind a 305
V6 t5 behind a 305
Hey all, I read the sticky all about the t5 and saw mentioned a few times that the v6 t5s input shaft is longer than the v8s one, can anybody truly verify this for sure, as I’m in the process of doing this swap and it’s all bolted in and done but it’s acting like the clutch won’t engage, I’m at my wits end! I’ve changed everything, new throwout bearing, new fork and pivot ball new pressure plate, using the proper clutch to get the v6 to work with a 14 spline center. I’ve even replaced the hydraulic system. And before you say so, yes I have installed the throwout bearing properly on the fork and it is all greased up properly. The only thing I can think of now is that the input shaft might be longer and maybe it’s pushing up on the crank so much that it’s forcing the trans to spin too?
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
[QUOTE=jmd;6410948]Yes.[/QUOTE
even with the input shaft being longer would it still be able to get flush with the bellhousing and mount up? Because mine is bolted in all the way
even with the input shaft being longer would it still be able to get flush with the bellhousing and mount up? Because mine is bolted in all the way
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
Yep. Loosen 4 trans bolts. Remove one, add washers, replace. Repeat. See if it helps.
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
Well I shimmed the transmission and it’s still doing it, the clutch absolutely will not disengage. I might try fabricating a longer slave cylinder pushrod for it and see if it does the trick.
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
Well I made 1 longer slave cylinder pushrod and I’ve gotten the clutch to sort of disengage I can get it into 1st, 2nd and 3rd no 4th 5th or reverse, I’m thinking it needs to be a little bit longer, my only question is why do I need more throw? Could it be an aftermarket clutch? I’m using a luk flywheel, clutch and pressure plate.
Trending Topics
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
If you have all correct parts that aren't worn or broken, you shouldn't need a modified slave cylinder.
Are your pedals from a third gen? If it has steel support rods that go to the master cylinder hole, they should be. Stamped support is 4th gen pedals.
Is it possibly a V6 clutch fork? I don't know what the difference is from a V8 third gen clutch fork, but it's different. There were early 4th gen clutch forks on V6 models.... you'd only have proper function from an 84-92 V8 fork.
Flywheel dimensions, and clutch parts matter. Whatever 14 spline clutch disc you have may be too thick. Or the pressure plate finger travel may differ. Or the clutch may be otherwise defective.
If you back up and make sure you have matching third gen V8 parts, you'll probably figure out why you're wrangling for a fix.
I'm grasping at straws, so welcome to the internet. Or something.
Are your pedals from a third gen? If it has steel support rods that go to the master cylinder hole, they should be. Stamped support is 4th gen pedals.
Is it possibly a V6 clutch fork? I don't know what the difference is from a V8 third gen clutch fork, but it's different. There were early 4th gen clutch forks on V6 models.... you'd only have proper function from an 84-92 V8 fork.
Flywheel dimensions, and clutch parts matter. Whatever 14 spline clutch disc you have may be too thick. Or the pressure plate finger travel may differ. Or the clutch may be otherwise defective.
If you back up and make sure you have matching third gen V8 parts, you'll probably figure out why you're wrangling for a fix.
I'm grasping at straws, so welcome to the internet. Or something.
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
If you have all correct parts that aren't worn or broken, you shouldn't need a modified slave cylinder.
Are your pedals from a third gen? If it has steel support rods that go to the master cylinder hole, they should be. Stamped support is 4th gen pedals.
Is it possibly a V6 clutch fork? I don't know what the difference is from a V8 third gen clutch fork, but it's different. There were early 4th gen clutch forks on V6 models.... you'd only have proper function from an 84-92 V8 fork.
Flywheel dimensions, and clutch parts matter. Whatever 14 spline clutch disc you have may be too thick. Or the pressure plate finger travel may differ. Or the clutch may be otherwise defective.
If you back up and make sure you have matching third gen V8 parts, you'll probably figure out why you're wrangling for a fix.
I'm grasping at straws, so welcome to the internet. Or something.
Are your pedals from a third gen? If it has steel support rods that go to the master cylinder hole, they should be. Stamped support is 4th gen pedals.
Is it possibly a V6 clutch fork? I don't know what the difference is from a V8 third gen clutch fork, but it's different. There were early 4th gen clutch forks on V6 models.... you'd only have proper function from an 84-92 V8 fork.
Flywheel dimensions, and clutch parts matter. Whatever 14 spline clutch disc you have may be too thick. Or the pressure plate finger travel may differ. Or the clutch may be otherwise defective.
If you back up and make sure you have matching third gen V8 parts, you'll probably figure out why you're wrangling for a fix.
I'm grasping at straws, so welcome to the internet. Or something.
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
I also appreciate the conjecture with you it’s great to be able to converse with others on issues with this car, this forum has been a real life saver for me a lot of times.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,522
Likes: 92
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
At this point, the disc seems like the odd man out and possible culprit. Off the top of my head, I thought that disc was smaller dia. for that application. That's secondary to the disc possibly being thicker than stock, which could lead to release failure.
To cut to the chase, pull it, see if the friction area thickness matches a parts store V8 10.5" disc and then find a local brake and clutch rebuilds. While they mostly do truck stuff these days, you could see if they could:
check your flywheel disc pp assy. for proper release.
possibly find an Astro van disc that is correct for your flywheel / pp and matches spline.
Or take the right disc and re-hub it to match spline.
To cut to the chase, pull it, see if the friction area thickness matches a parts store V8 10.5" disc and then find a local brake and clutch rebuilds. While they mostly do truck stuff these days, you could see if they could:
check your flywheel disc pp assy. for proper release.
possibly find an Astro van disc that is correct for your flywheel / pp and matches spline.
Or take the right disc and re-hub it to match spline.
Re: V6 t5 behind a 305
At this point, the disc seems like the odd man out and possible culprit. Off the top of my head, I thought that disc was smaller dia. for that application. That's secondary to the disc possibly being thicker than stock, which could lead to release failure.
To cut to the chase, pull it, see if the friction area thickness matches a parts store V8 10.5" disc and then find a local brake and clutch rebuilds. While they mostly do truck stuff these days, you could see if they could:
check your flywheel disc pp assy. for proper release.
possibly find an Astro van disc that is correct for your flywheel / pp and matches spline.
Or take the right disc and re-hub it to match spline.
To cut to the chase, pull it, see if the friction area thickness matches a parts store V8 10.5" disc and then find a local brake and clutch rebuilds. While they mostly do truck stuff these days, you could see if they could:
check your flywheel disc pp assy. for proper release.
possibly find an Astro van disc that is correct for your flywheel / pp and matches spline.
Or take the right disc and re-hub it to match spline.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
83z28400sbc
Transmissions and Drivetrain
1
Oct 8, 2001 06:18 PM








