V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

b&m short throw shifter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 2, 2002 | 11:37 PM
  #1  
jwright's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Canton OH
b&m short throw shifter

who was a b&m short throw shifter and any thoughts?
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 02:04 AM
  #2  
elevario's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T5
I don't, but I want one bad!
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 10:33 AM
  #3  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
Do our cars use a weaker version of the same 5 speed found under V8's? Or do the V6's use an entirely different 5 speed? Just curious...
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 11:18 AM
  #4  
Joe_L's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS,Canada
Car: 1995 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Built 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - Limited Slip
Tom, Are you asking if our V-6 T5 is compatible to a V-8?
If so, then I would say yes. I believe 1992tealgreenRS posted that in a few posts back.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 11:52 AM
  #5  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I might be wrong but only thing different in a stick v6 and a stick v8 is the engine.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
Joe_L's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: Halifax, NS,Canada
Car: 1995 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: Built 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23's - Limited Slip
Originally posted by Gumby
I might be wrong but only thing different in a stick v6 and a stick v8 is the engine.
That is how I understand it to be.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 01:37 PM
  #7  
jwright's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Canton OH
well i just ordered a b&m shifter from summit, ill let you know how i like it and how hard the install is whenever i get it.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2002 | 01:40 PM
  #8  
Gumby's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 6
From: NWOhioToledoArea
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
should add, BUT anything bigger than a 305 will shread your tranny.

"I might be wrong but only thing different in a stick v6 and a stick v8 is the engine."


[If GM could of gotten away with using a T5 on a 350, they would have.]

But goodie for us we do get better rear end ratios than the V8.

a stock v6 stick with a 305 mod will be faster than a original stock 305 stick form the factory. unless they got a posi or upgrade stock package.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 08:20 PM
  #9  
92RSMuscle's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
the 700R4 in a v8 the tranny is 10 inches across
in a v6 its 9 inches across... other than that...the same
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2002 | 08:55 PM
  #10  
elevario's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T5
I'm impatient! I want to know how the short throw feels! It's wierd, because when I drive my friends tiburon with a short throw, it feels so nice! I kind of want it in my car just for fun but am I the only one who kind of likes the long throws in the t5? Feels good, next thing I will get will be a short throw! Oh, how much did the short throw run you? Thanks!
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2002 | 08:33 AM
  #11  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
So they're both called "T-5"'s then? 700r4 between v8 & v6 also gives the v6 a smaller bellhousing, fewer clutches in the clutch packs, and in one spot, a "thin sprag and spacer" where the v8 got a "thick sprag". Either GM was trying to reduce stress on the engine, or was just being cheap. What's cool is any 700r4 rebuild kit doesn't say "meant for v8" or "meant for v6"; they're all meant for v8's, and all the parts fit into the v6 trans!
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2002 | 11:23 AM
  #12  
elevario's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, Az, USA
Car: 1992 RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T5
Do you have the shifter yet?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 01:39 PM
  #13  
pontiacguy1's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Pulaski, TN
Actually, I think that the reason that GM didn't use the 5 speed behind the 350 is because of chassis flex in the 3rd gen chassis. What you were saying is definitely true: the 350 will tend to shred a T5, but GM could have easily upgraded that transmission to handle the extra torque if they wanted to with some heavier internals. I have read somewhere that the real problem was chassis flex with the 5 speed and the 350 in that chassis when launching really hard. GM decided that too much extra bracing was required for that combo. Anyway, I think that there was more than one reason that the 350s only came with the slushbox. I don't mean to start another discussion, just sharing something that I had read a while back.

Good luck with your shifter upgrade. I have heard that it makes the car much more fun to drive.

Last edited by pontiacguy1; Sep 20, 2002 at 01:44 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 02:10 PM
  #14  
MDv6man's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,282
Likes: 1
From: Elkton MD USA
Car: 1983, 1986
Engine: 2.8 2bbl, 2.8 MPFI
Transmission: 200C 3 speed, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.42
Originally posted by pontiacguy1
Actually, I think that the reason that GM didn't use the 5 speed behind the 350 is because of chassis flex in the 3rd gen chassis. What you were saying is definitely true: the 350 will tend to shred a T5, but GM could have easily upgraded that transmission to handle the extra torque if they wanted to with some heavier internals. I have read somewhere that the real problem was chassis flex with the 5 speed and the 350 in that chassis when launching really hard. GM decided that too much extra bracing was required for that combo. Anyway, I think that there was more than one reason that the 350s only came with the slushbox. I don't mean to start another discussion, just sharing something that I had read a while back.
Man just another example of GM being too cheap to produce a decent competitor to the mustang (back in the day). A few more hours on the line and SFC's could have easily been added thus giving the performance aficianado a true performance value!! At least they woke up with the fourth gens (performance wise)
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2002 | 11:04 PM
  #15  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
During the 80's (beside the statement from pontiacguy 1 which probably is very true) GM was just trying to keep ahead of the govt. emissons/gas milage regulations & be profitable.
There wasn't that much horsepower being generated. GM was cutting costs/corners for mass market share profit.

Going from a sloppy factory shifter to a percise aftermarket shifter, is almost more fun than sex.

I once went from 3" gear change travel to 1" gear change travel.
Subject my old 1966 Corvette.
Only I rebuilt the Corvette factory shifter.


Perhaps also change your old tranny fluid, too?
Use a synthetic lube.
I plan on that in my 1967 Camaro M-21 tranny.
I hear that helps with smooth operation
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2002 | 10:07 PM
  #16  
wes2k3's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Albany, IL (Near Clinton IA)
The problem with the T5 is the case AND the internals. The gears teeth are on too much of an angle and a torquey motor will strecth the case. GM had no intention of making a strong 5 speed or the vette would have had one instead of an old tried and trued T-10 (and the 4+3 which is a T-10 with OD). If GM wouldn't tool up to make a nice tranny for the vette there is no way in hell they would for a thirdgen.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:40 AM
  #17  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
Come to California, buy one decent 3rd gen & drive it home!
Nice vacation!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:51 PM
  #18  
wes2k3's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Albany, IL (Near Clinton IA)
Come to California, buy one decent 3rd gen & drive it home!
I was thinking that!!!!!!!!!

I have an aunt that lives in Roseville, CA. I am going out there after I graduate (high school) this spring.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2002 | 09:59 PM
  #19  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
I BELIEVE several 3rd Gen members out by Roseville.
I have fond memories of Roseville form mid-80's.
DO IT DO IT DO IT!
Have your aunt buy you one! Await ya while ya visit!
BUY THE MOST INTACT COMPLETE LOW MILAGE SURVIVOR YA CAN FIND WIHT ALL THE OPTIONS, PERFORMANCE ONES ONLY no space age dashes that fail at daybreak!
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 06:10 PM
  #20  
wes2k3's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: Albany, IL (Near Clinton IA)
I will if I can't find anything nice here. It's gonna be way more expensive out there.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2002 | 07:12 PM
  #21  
KED85's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 7,604
Likes: 1
From: ****SoCal, USA****
You'd be way surprised how cheap they cost out here
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wigmobile
Electronics
5
Feb 26, 2025 02:56 PM
AmpleUnicorn88
Interior Parts Wanted
16
Nov 29, 2015 05:45 PM
topteam54
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
9
Oct 6, 2015 12:21 AM
RyanJB
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Sep 14, 2015 03:39 PM
Fronzizzle
Electronics
3
Sep 8, 2015 12:10 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.