air intakes??
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,028
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
Car: 85' Firebird (Project), 92' RS
Engine: 2.8L, LS1
Transmission: 700R4, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Open , 10 Bolt (ukn)
what's the size of the MAF? just curious. If you have a 3.1L car w/ speed density, it's cheaper, and probably easier too. But my lil' 2.8L would also need a bellow to attach to the Mass Air Flow.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
check out this thread: https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=142957
it has "some" pics of my intake, and yes, there is a MAF in there some where
it has "some" pics of my intake, and yes, there is a MAF in there some where
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: air intakes??
Originally posted by ionicswing
im thinking about getting a k&n intake system, but i have a ,?, would it be better for me to make my own or just buy the k&n system??
im thinking about getting a k&n intake system, but i have a ,?, would it be better for me to make my own or just buy the k&n system??
You'll need a filler for the lack of MAF, heck a gutted MAF will work. I used a soup can for a while then made a filler out of some PVC pipe.
Made a world of difference. I think that I may go find the original setup and take a pic of the opening to the filter. Bet you can't drop a quarter through it!
RBob.
edit: well, a little bigger then a quarter. The engine breathes through a 1-5/8" opening. See pics.
Last edited by RBob; Nov 15, 2002 at 05:42 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
I don't think the bastage has a MAF sensor.
I aint feeling well these last few days. I'll take some bettre pics of my setup which does have the MAF . Basically, there is the filter connected to the 1st 90* pvc elbow. I have a rubber coupler attaching the elbow to the MAF. All the bends/elbows were removed from it so it's a straight peice. Due to the lip of the back of the MAF being slighlty smaller than the 3"pvc tube, I took out the dremel and started grinding away on the inside of the tube untill it fit nice & snug. I'm gonna use some rtv to seal it up nice & good. from the tube I go into a 45* street bend, this has the big end on one side to connect to the pipe, & regular size other end. this I put into the flexable rubber intake boot. **** In order to get the best airflow w/minimun friction, I also shoved a piece of the 3" pvc tube into the intake boot. It starts about 2" from ther front, to allow the 45* street bend to butt up against it. & it ends just before the pcv tube thing that connects to the bottom of the intake boot on the pass side.
the black section right by the upper radiator tube is the MAF.
edit: sorry for the insanely huge pic
I aint feeling well these last few days. I'll take some bettre pics of my setup which does have the MAF . Basically, there is the filter connected to the 1st 90* pvc elbow. I have a rubber coupler attaching the elbow to the MAF. All the bends/elbows were removed from it so it's a straight peice. Due to the lip of the back of the MAF being slighlty smaller than the 3"pvc tube, I took out the dremel and started grinding away on the inside of the tube untill it fit nice & snug. I'm gonna use some rtv to seal it up nice & good. from the tube I go into a 45* street bend, this has the big end on one side to connect to the pipe, & regular size other end. this I put into the flexable rubber intake boot. **** In order to get the best airflow w/minimun friction, I also shoved a piece of the 3" pvc tube into the intake boot. It starts about 2" from ther front, to allow the 45* street bend to butt up against it. & it ends just before the pcv tube thing that connects to the bottom of the intake boot on the pass side.
the black section right by the upper radiator tube is the MAF.
edit: sorry for the insanely huge pic
Last edited by Project: 85 2.8 bird; Nov 15, 2002 at 09:04 PM.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
I don't mind the huge pic, except that you post is a wide as the thread so I had to scroll to and fro. I would like to shorten my intake so the airflow is straighter. I'm sure you have seen my setup before, but I will show it again.
The green arrow is pointing to my Accel Ignition box - it was the only place I could mount it.
The green arrow is pointing to my Accel Ignition box - it was the only place I could mount it.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Originally posted by ionicswing
do you have a pic of that snorkel on the engine for i can get a better idea of what you're taling about!!
do you have a pic of that snorkel on the engine for i can get a better idea of what you're taling about!!
RBob.
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 18,432
Likes: 233
From: Chasing Electrons
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Pic of the 2.8L MAF based Camaro setup. This is what I am currently using. The opening in the center is where the hood latch resides. The bottom of the pic is the front of the car. The filters are located in front of the radiator in the open area of the nose. (two filters one each inside the area surrounded by the shiney 1/4 turn fasteners).
The area of the housing that is raised is where it goes over the radiator. The fitting on the upper right is for the IAT. TPI Camaros use this same filter setup with the exception that they do not have the IAT fitting.
Note that this setup does NOT fit Firebirds.
It does provide a significant inprovement in airflow.
RBob.
The area of the housing that is raised is where it goes over the radiator. The fitting on the upper right is for the IAT. TPI Camaros use this same filter setup with the exception that they do not have the IAT fitting.
Note that this setup does NOT fit Firebirds.
It does provide a significant inprovement in airflow.
RBob.
Ok, the majority of the home made cold air intakes I've seen have the cone filter resting right near the top of the engine bay, isn't that just pulling hot air from the engine? Shouldn't they be lower, down inside the fender?
Mathius
Mathius
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by ionicswing
which one do you think would gain more hp, the dual snorkel, or another like the red one shown above???
which one do you think would gain more hp, the dual snorkel, or another like the red one shown above???
They will most likely be the same since our motors are small.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
checkout the posts by that dude, Project somthin or other, I hear he's doing an intake that has the air filter not in the engine bay, AND addresses the MAF sensor for those involved.
Which do you think would be better, more efective, least amount of problems, I was thinking of mounting it straight down, almost under the car, but someone told me that there could be problems with water getting in there during the wet season.
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Originally posted by devianb
I just figured out why your intake looks so clean, what did you do with your MAF sensor?
I just figured out why your intake looks so clean, what did you do with your MAF sensor?

Yep, no MAF for me. 91 'bird. Speed density.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by 86Firebirdv6
Which do you think would be better, more efective, least amount of problems, I was thinking of mounting it straight down, almost under the car, but someone told me that there could be problems with water getting in there during the wet season.
Which do you think would be better, more efective, least amount of problems, I was thinking of mounting it straight down, almost under the car, but someone told me that there could be problems with water getting in there during the wet season.
Redraif tried that before and hit a skunk or armidillo, but anyways it took out her filter. She doesn't have that setup anymore. Yeah the filter would get preety dirty down there. I have seen mud come up as far as the alternator pulley.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
for those who haven't seen it in the other post, here's wwhat I did. The hole hasn't been cut out yet for the filter in the pic, but it has been done to the car & the intake is pretty much as shown:
oh yeah, insanely stupid huge pic
oh yeah, insanely stupid huge pic
I use the 2.8 maf based set up RBob shows, with some slight modifications. My engine bay would get real hot, so I cut the water shields off and got some big *** angled pipes and put them one, coming out where my fog lights are. At high speeds, I get somewhat of a ram effect, but I never ever get hot air in my intake. And when my car was running at higher temps, it greatly decreased that bogged down feeling when you floor it but don't go anywhere. Not really a problem now, but in the 95 degree summers here, its a big help.
I'll post some pics when I get to my home computer.
I'll post some pics when I get to my home computer.
OK
WHEN I WAS SINGLE
I "liked" trying the performance and difference between Blondes, Brunettes & Redheads, Myself!
If in one romance dance in same night, that was a good night!
Those Disco Nights were good for something!
PS Good time to try this theory is Christmas parties & New Years parties! GET YA HEADS OUTTA THE HOODS!
WHEN I WAS SINGLE
I "liked" trying the performance and difference between Blondes, Brunettes & Redheads, Myself!
If in one romance dance in same night, that was a good night!
Those Disco Nights were good for something!
PS Good time to try this theory is Christmas parties & New Years parties! GET YA HEADS OUTTA THE HOODS!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
kyle5647
Tech / General Engine
1
Aug 15, 2015 11:56 PM





