Question about the v6 turbo sticky
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1 V6
Transmission: Automatic
Question about the v6 turbo sticky
Great job on the sticky about the turbo Dave. I learned alot from it. My question is how much horsepower would be gained by the turbo? Alos how much would all the piping cost and a new turbo its self? Could someone use plastic piping for these 90* bends?
depend son what turbo and were u get it,but u can expect to pay between 250-700 for a turbo.100 hp on an intercooled setup is typical (7psi) on stock engine.piping depend son what u use (mandrel bends or not) best bet is mandrel bends from summit. and i would not use plastic piping
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Salem, Ohio
Car: 92 Firebird - 97 Talon TSi AWD
Engine: Firebird: 3.1L - Talon: 2.0L
Transmission: Firebird: 700r4
Turbos themselves can be quite expensive depending on what you run... For the size required for these motors I would guess somewhere between 500-900 for a used one and 1200+ for a new one.
Piping usually isn't too expensive. Just depends where you get it from. I wouldn't use any plastic piping though just because it absorbs heat from everything and you really need to be keeping the charge air as cool as possible. If you were to run plastic pipes on the setup you would pretty much defeat the purpose of the intercooler. Aluminum piping is so much easier to work with anyways and it'll deflect most of the heat generated by the turbo and motor.
Piping usually isn't too expensive. Just depends where you get it from. I wouldn't use any plastic piping though just because it absorbs heat from everything and you really need to be keeping the charge air as cool as possible. If you were to run plastic pipes on the setup you would pretty much defeat the purpose of the intercooler. Aluminum piping is so much easier to work with anyways and it'll deflect most of the heat generated by the turbo and motor.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Salem, Ohio
Car: 92 Firebird - 97 Talon TSi AWD
Engine: Firebird: 3.1L - Talon: 2.0L
Transmission: Firebird: 700r4
depend son what turbo and were u get it,but u can expect to pay between 250-700 for a turbo.100 hp on an intercooled setup is typical (7psi) on stock engine.piping depend son what u use (mandrel bends or not) best bet is mandrel bends from summit. and i would not use plastic piping
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Salem, Ohio
Car: 92 Firebird - 97 Talon TSi AWD
Engine: Firebird: 3.1L - Talon: 2.0L
Transmission: Firebird: 700r4
Trending Topics
beleive it or not the hardest thing is welding in the fitting for the oil return from the turbo,if the oil pan is on the engine in the car.if the pan is off the engine its easy.but if its in the car u have to be very careful not to set the oil on fire,and there uis a huge risk of explosion,since some of the gas gets down into the oil,the worst thing u could do is drian the pan before u weld on it.highly not recomended to be done by a novice welder,or if the engine has run within the last few hours
Supreme Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Car: 1985 Camaro, 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L carbed and 5.0L TPI
Transmission: TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 and 3.27 posi
To4e turbos regularly sell on ebay for around $200. But hey, Dave has a turbo kit available, check it out!
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Western PA
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1/3100 in progress...Turbo Soon
Transmission: 700r4
I got a question about the how to sticky...What did you do with the "orb of power"? You never mentioned it in the how to, so I was just wondering what you did.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Car: '86 Camaro, '85 Z28, '92 Firebird
Engine: LB8 2.8, LG4 5.0, LO3 5.0
Transmission: TH-700R4, T-5, TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s, 3.23s, 2.73s
beleive it or not the hardest thing is welding in the fitting for the oil return from the turbo,if the oil pan is on the engine in the car.if the pan is off the engine its easy.but if its in the car u have to be very careful not to set the oil on fire,and there uis a huge risk of explosion,since some of the gas gets down into the oil,the worst thing u could do is drian the pan before u weld on it.highly not recomended to be done by a novice welder,or if the engine has run within the last few hours
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 870
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 3
Engine: inboard
Transmission: underfloor
You definitely do not want to restrict the oil return from the turbo. Dave is right, you would have to mount the turbo above valve cover level to get good drainage. The remote, rear mount setups marketed for late model trucks and fourth gen F bodies use a pump to return the oil.
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Car: '86 Camaro, '85 Z28, '92 Firebird
Engine: LB8 2.8, LG4 5.0, LO3 5.0
Transmission: TH-700R4, T-5, TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s, 3.23s, 2.73s
ok, but something I haven't been able to figure out is where you are getting the oil feed to the turbo from?
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Car: '86 Camaro, '85 Z28, '92 Firebird
Engine: LB8 2.8, LG4 5.0, LO3 5.0
Transmission: TH-700R4, T-5, TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s, 3.23s, 2.73s
ah, that makes sense. here is another random question, does a turbo need to be mounted in a certain direction or can it be on is side or other random directions?
the cold side and hot sides of the turbo can be rotated to any position u want.the centersection/bearing housing must have the oil feed ontop,and the drian on the bottom.,though u dont want the feed inlet at the 12 oclock postion and the drain at 6.the best results are to mount it so the feed and drian are around 15* off those positions
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Car: '86 Camaro, '85 Z28, '92 Firebird
Engine: LB8 2.8, LG4 5.0, LO3 5.0
Transmission: TH-700R4, T-5, TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s, 3.23s, 2.73s
ok, so mounting the turbo with like the cold side on top and the hot side down, with the oil feed/return horizontal would hurt it? Im just asking out of the sake of curiousity, so thanks
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 870
Likes: 1
From: Savannah, GA
Car: 3
Engine: inboard
Transmission: underfloor
Say you do a rapid decelleration- the turbo shaft is still spinning at high RPM, but the oil volume and pressure have dropped considerably. The oil serves to lubricate the shaft and cool it. So if you mounted your turbo so the oil supply and drain are horizontal.....the "top" bearing gets starved- keep in mind the bearings are more like plain bushings- and I have seen many shafts galled and blued, and some broken in turbos. Loose lube at 20,000 RPM and it gets ugly.
they could be,but u would need one hell of a modified motor,not to mention a really high stall converter,if the car is an automatic.or u would have some massive lag.and u would have to run very high boost levels to stay away from compressor surge.twin t3's would work much better.prolly around something like .42/.50's
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Piping usually isn't too expensive. Just depends where you get it from. I wouldn't use any plastic piping though just because it absorbs heat from everything and you really need to be keeping the charge air as cool as possible. If you were to run plastic pipes on the setup you would pretty much defeat the purpose of the intercooler. Aluminum piping is so much easier to work with anyways and it'll deflect most of the heat generated by the turbo and motor.
The problem with plastic is that under decent boost you might end up with 2-300* air going through it and most plastics aren’t strong enough at those temps, that being said, it has been done semi successfully, it’s just sort of a borderline situation there that I wouldn’t want to deal with long term.
the cold side and hot sides of the turbo can be rotated to any position u want.the centersection/bearing housing must have the oil feed ontop,and the drian on the bottom.,though u dont want the feed inlet at the 12 oclock postion and the drain at 6.the best results are to mount it so the feed and drian are around 15* off those positions
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Inglewood, CA
Car: 92 Firebird
Engine: 3.1
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: stock, dynomax turbo exhaust
Twin Turbos
they could be,but u would need one hell of a modified motor,not to mention a really high stall converter,if the car is an automatic.or u would have some massive lag.and u would have to run very high boost levels to stay away from compressor surge.twin t3's would work much better.prolly around something like .42/.50's
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Salem, Ohio
Car: 92 Firebird - 97 Talon TSi AWD
Engine: Firebird: 3.1L - Talon: 2.0L
Transmission: Firebird: 700r4
Actually, just the opposite… aluminum will absorb and shed heat to air MUCH faster then plastic, plastic is almost an insulator where aluminum conducts, radiates… quite well… there is a reason why they make heat sinks and radiators out of aluminum and not plastic.
not to hijack the thread, but I have a question for Dave or anyone else who ran their exhaust piping under the frost suspension. Do you have any clearance issues in day to day driving? I'm afraid that if I do my exhaust the same way you show in the wright up I'll scrape every time I go over a speed bump.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,028
Likes: 93
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Small twins on a v6 would really be trick… you should get faster/more aggressive spooling then you would with a comparably sized single, and with the small size and the narrow V6 solve the problems that I have with running twins on a V8 powered f-body (more room for down pipes on both sides and you don’t need as big a down pipe for the smaller turbo). In the end you won’t get the big power numbers like you would get with some of the hairier V8 turbo setups, but it should still be able to make quite respectable numbers and be a very efficient combination. It would be very interesting to see how much lighter you could make the 60* V6 turbo setup (as compared to the relatively heavy 3.8 turbo setup like in the TTA) then a V8 also…
Doing some quick, back of the napkin type calculations, a built up/optimized 3.1 making peak power in the mid/high 6xxxRPM range should be making 500hp at 15psi boost, a 3.4 bottom end under the same conditions should be capable of somewhere around 560… and the 60* V6’s, fully dressed, usually weigh roughly ½ what an SBC weighs and obviously sits further back resulting in significantly better weight distribution…. Huh, I wonder what a TKO600 would weigh (which should pretty much live forever behind something like that), and even a built up/optimized stock rear should last pretty long (and be much lighter then something like the braced moser that I’ve got in my formula).
Huh… wheels turning…
Doing some quick, back of the napkin type calculations, a built up/optimized 3.1 making peak power in the mid/high 6xxxRPM range should be making 500hp at 15psi boost, a 3.4 bottom end under the same conditions should be capable of somewhere around 560… and the 60* V6’s, fully dressed, usually weigh roughly ½ what an SBC weighs and obviously sits further back resulting in significantly better weight distribution…. Huh, I wonder what a TKO600 would weigh (which should pretty much live forever behind something like that), and even a built up/optimized stock rear should last pretty long (and be much lighter then something like the braced moser that I’ve got in my formula).
Huh… wheels turning…
not to hijack the thread, but I have a question for Dave or anyone else who ran their exhaust piping under the frost suspension. Do you have any clearance issues in day to day driving? I'm afraid that if I do my exhaust the same way you show in the wright up I'll scrape every time I go over a speed bump.
----------
Small twins on a v6 would really be trick… you should get faster/more aggressive spooling then you would with a comparably sized single, and with the small size and the narrow V6 solve the problems that I have with running twins on a V8 powered f-body (more room for down pipes on both sides and you don’t need as big a down pipe for the smaller turbo). In the end you won’t get the big power numbers like you would get with some of the hairier V8 turbo setups, but it should still be able to make quite respectable numbers and be a very efficient combination. It would be very interesting to see how much lighter you could make the 60* V6 turbo setup (as compared to the relatively heavy 3.8 turbo setup like in the TTA) then a V8 also…
Doing some quick, back of the napkin type calculations, a built up/optimized 3.1 making peak power in the mid/high 6xxxRPM range should be making 500hp at 15psi boost, a 3.4 bottom end under the same conditions should be capable of somewhere around 560… and the 60* V6’s, fully dressed, usually weigh roughly ½ what an SBC weighs and obviously sits further back resulting in significantly better weight distribution…. Huh, I wonder what a TKO600 would weigh (which should pretty much live forever behind something like that), and even a built up/optimized stock rear should last pretty long (and be much lighter then something like the braced moser that I’ve got in my formula).
Huh… wheels turning…
Doing some quick, back of the napkin type calculations, a built up/optimized 3.1 making peak power in the mid/high 6xxxRPM range should be making 500hp at 15psi boost, a 3.4 bottom end under the same conditions should be capable of somewhere around 560… and the 60* V6’s, fully dressed, usually weigh roughly ½ what an SBC weighs and obviously sits further back resulting in significantly better weight distribution…. Huh, I wonder what a TKO600 would weigh (which should pretty much live forever behind something like that), and even a built up/optimized stock rear should last pretty long (and be much lighter then something like the braced moser that I’ve got in my formula).
Huh… wheels turning…
Last edited by daves12secV6; Oct 10, 2006 at 09:10 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZZ3Astro
Power Adders
1045
Aug 13, 2019 12:57 AM
Andrew Prakash
TPI
2
Sep 8, 2015 11:48 AM







