V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Anyone using 89 octane with their chip?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 15, 2001 | 08:04 AM
  #1  
Jason E's Avatar
Thread Starter
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
Anyone using 89 octane with their chip?

If so, how is your car running? I never used 89 when mine was in, as it was recommended for 93 with the chip. However, after driving the LT1 non-stop for a month, hopping in the RS reveals ANYTHING that can improve the performance is good. I don't wanna pay for 93 for this car too, though.

So the question is, has anyone tried 89 with a chip? How does it perform?

------------------
Jason E

'89 Camaro RS 2.8
Medium Grey Metallic
2.8, A4, T-tops, 90k miles

'97 Z28 w/30th Anniversary package
LT1 (obviously), 6 speed, t-tops
White with orange stripes, killer system, 41k miles

Speed Kills...Wanna live forever? Drive a Ford.
Long Live #3...
Reply
Old May 15, 2001 | 11:00 AM
  #2  
Ovrclck350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 1
From: Longview, Tx
With gas prices the way they are, I'm runnin 87 with my chip. Although strangely, my car feels happier with 87 than 89.
Reply
Old May 15, 2001 | 11:04 AM
  #3  
Jason E's Avatar
Thread Starter
2011 Norwood Gathering
ThirdGen Firebird Rep
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 4
From: Sarasota FL
Car: 99 WS6 / 00 SS / 11 CTS-V / 13 300
Engine: LS1 / LS1 / LSA / 5.7 Hemi
Transmission: 4L60E / T-56 / 6L80E / W5A80
Axle/Gears: 3.23 / 3.42 Auburn / 3.23 / 2.62
If you run 87 though, doesn't the chip have virtually no effect? I thought one of the main ways a chip improved performance was to recalibrate WOT settings for higher octane gas. If you don't use higher than 87, won't the advanced calibrations be null and void?
Reply
Old May 15, 2001 | 02:26 PM
  #4  
Brian K's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 1
From: Orlando,Fl, USA


After extensive testing (YA RIGHT) my car does feel to run better with 89 over 93... After running several tanks of 93 and then saying this is to darn expensive I went back to 89 and it seemed more alive.. Who knows so I have used 89 since and it has not hurt anything yet.
Reply
Old May 15, 2001 | 03:56 PM
  #5  
TomP's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 6
From: Central NJ, USA
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I always used 93 or 94... but I think I'm taking the ADS chip out this summer... from what Glenn saw of the V8 ADS chip, if it's that badly programmed, I'm sure the V6 version I have isn't much better. With the removal of the ADS chip, I'll advance my timing 2 or 4 degrees.


------------------
-Tom P (Hot rodded 1986 Firebird 2.8l) from http://www.f-body.net/mailbag/3rd/3rd_mailbag.html message boards
---Think your car could be pic of the week? Visit http://www.f-body.net for details!
Reply
Old May 15, 2001 | 04:40 PM
  #6  
Ovrclck350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 1
From: Longview, Tx
Jason, honestly, my car feels faster when I'm runnin 87. When I put anything else in, it feels sluggish.
Reply
Old May 16, 2001 | 01:25 AM
  #7  
AntiVTEC's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Union City, CA
seems like the lower octanes do provide the advantage.. even with the chip... late!

------------------
85 2.8L Sport Coupe 5-speed.
Mods: Hpertech chip and powerstat, MSD 6A-L, Crane fireball coil, Dynomax hi-flow cat and catback system with a dynomax magnum race bullet muffler on the i-pipe, K&N filterchargers, Eibach and Tokiko springs/shocks setup, Global west sub frames, Suspension techniqs front and rear sway bars, and good ole 88 IROC wheels with Kumo Ecstas on em!
"I'm out to seek those pesky VTEC boys!" (don't get me wrong, I'm asian myself! hehe)

Wins: 2000 V6 Accord, 69 302 Mustang, 2000 Auto VR6 Jetta, 89 Toyota MR2, 90 Civic Si, 76 350 Camaro.

[This message has been edited by AntiVTEC (edited May 15, 2001).]
Reply
Old May 16, 2001 | 03:12 AM
  #8  
FAST RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,937
Likes: 0
From: Moorpark
Car: 1991 CAMARO 1968 FIREBIRD
Engine: CAMARO 3.1L FIREBIRD 455
Transmission: CAMARO 700R4 FIREBIRD TH-400
Ive used 87 with my chip i gont engine knock up the *** so i jsut use 92 im probly not gonna take my chip out jsut for the face 20 cents more a gallon dsent seem that much but 2.30 a gallon uggg and still riseing.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
28
Oct 24, 2025 02:00 PM
89-IROCZ-5.0TPI
TPI
10
Feb 22, 2022 09:26 PM
KO1
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Oct 15, 2015 05:00 PM
jaridjohn
Exhaust
14
Oct 5, 2015 07:01 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.