Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
OK. I've been out of the 3rdGen game since 1994, but recently bought a 1991 L98 Formula. The brakes seem terrible! I mean scary poor! Now granted, I have been spoiled by my recent stable of vehicles (Z06, C4, LS1 Z28, etc), but my wife's Buick LeSabre is more confidence-inspiring...
I have put on new pads and the rotors are nearly new. The only issue is that the brake fluid gets dark VERY quickly.
So, do the 3rdGen brakes suck (in which case I will upgrade to LS1s or similar), or do you think something is out of whack? Thanks!
I have put on new pads and the rotors are nearly new. The only issue is that the brake fluid gets dark VERY quickly.
So, do the 3rdGen brakes suck (in which case I will upgrade to LS1s or similar), or do you think something is out of whack? Thanks!
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,652
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes
on
44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
in comparison with newer vehicles, the brakes do suck, but they should not be scary. You should be able to lock up the wheels with relative ease. If not, you probably have an issues with the booster, brakes, or a combo of a few things. If the fluid is that dark, you may want to flush the entire system, replace all the flex hoses and fill with new fluid and try again.
a upgrade of the front brakes would not be a bad idea. The rears should be 11" PBR's and are not that bad.
a upgrade of the front brakes would not be a bad idea. The rears should be 11" PBR's and are not that bad.
Last edited by //<86TA>\\; 12-14-2008 at 12:11 PM.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
Well the brakes feel really spongy and don't seem to stop that well, making the Formy feel heavier than it is. I am not a brake guru by any stretch, so maybe I'll have them looked at since rotors/pads/fluid didn't do much (if anything). Thanks for the input! B
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
Ed
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
If you have those and cant' upgrade, rebuild them using the recall kit and you should be good to go.
Ed
Ed
#7
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
ebmiller88: Yah, the front hoses/lines are new. The RF line was bad and pinching, so they got replaced. The fluid was bled until clear, but 1300 miles later it is black. Maybe there was an accumulation of crud in there?
Anyways, I'll probably man up and take it to a pro for an opinion...maybe I missed something.
I'll probably upgrade the fronts anyway to J55s or LS1s...the aftermarket stuff gets pricey fast!
Thanks for your help!
Anyways, I'll probably man up and take it to a pro for an opinion...maybe I missed something.
I'll probably upgrade the fronts anyway to J55s or LS1s...the aftermarket stuff gets pricey fast!
Thanks for your help!
Trending Topics
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
Ed- By the way, I have the flynbye website in My Favorites if/when upgrade time comes...
#9
Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Barrie On. Canada
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
spongy feeling brakes would tell me that you still have air in your lines.
#10
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
If I can lock up all 4 & leave 4 big black marks (trying to dodge a deer on the road) That would tell me...My small rear discs with iron calipers do a pretty good job.
Things like braided brake lines are 1 improvement you can make over the stock rubber lines. They won't swell under pedal pressure, during braking.
#12
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
yeah, they do suck. even with the 1le's, and playing with prop valves for years, they just suck.
I went with a more agressive pad to "solve" the problem.
actually I found OEM C4 pads seemed to be a streetable pad that made the difference. the pad was made by PBR.
I went with a more agressive pad to "solve" the problem.
actually I found OEM C4 pads seemed to be a streetable pad that made the difference. the pad was made by PBR.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
Cast irons don't automatically suck.
If I can lock up all 4 & leave 4 big black marks (trying to dodge a deer on the road) That would tell me...My small rear discs with iron calipers do a pretty good job.
Things like braided brake lines are 1 improvement you can make over the stock rubber lines. They won't swell under pedal pressure, during braking.
If I can lock up all 4 & leave 4 big black marks (trying to dodge a deer on the road) That would tell me...My small rear discs with iron calipers do a pretty good job.
Things like braided brake lines are 1 improvement you can make over the stock rubber lines. They won't swell under pedal pressure, during braking.
maybe your master cylinder isn't holding pressure anymore. mine was pretty bad. I replaced it and now I have to make a huge effort not to lock up my brakes, especially in this weather.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
ive got a 4wheel disc car with aluminum rear calipers and its a pain in the rear not to go into all wheel lock up sometimes.......i love these brakes so far
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
i dont know why people knock f-body brakes. just have to upgrade the size of the rotors in the front and leave the rears alone. 11.6's in the rear are big enough for me.....least til i start road racing
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
You've got the good rear discs, that's why..it's the guys with the earlier '84-88 rear discs who usually have the issues. The '89-up rear discs are fine, same calipers used up until '98 and Baer still uses them in rear disc conversion kits. Good indeed.
Ed
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
OHHH! i gothcha
#19
Banned
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
That alone makes me wanna upgrade to at least 4th gen or C5 disks. Just not sure what it would take to put those on my 9-bolt.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
Then please explain my 87 "tiny discs? I certainly can't complain, when it has the ability to lock all 4 tires......Yes, larger should/could/would be better. But visually? Yes...They suck behind my 17" Snypers.
That alone makes me wanna upgrade to at least 4th gen or C5 disks. Just not sure what it would take to put those on my 9-bolt.
That alone makes me wanna upgrade to at least 4th gen or C5 disks. Just not sure what it would take to put those on my 9-bolt.
If i remember correctly, Ed makes the conversion brackets?
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sanford, FL
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 RS Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
other than the wieght the rear drums aren't so bad because I can lock all four up on my 92 RS with v8.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
its not about the initial bite, rear drum have an advantage there. drum brakes lock up quicker than disc. the advantage of disc brakes is there ability to shed heat quickly.
#23
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
----------
I'm not sure if this is directed towards me, but thanks for the suggestion!
Last edited by danziger; 12-26-2008 at 12:58 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 88 IROC, 76 Malibu Classic
Engine: 350 TPI, 350
Transmission: 700R4, 4-speed
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt ????
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
yea, its my suggestion. when master cylinders get old sometimes the seals on the piston won't hold much pressure so it just pushes fluid around in the master cylinder and doesn't create a ton of pressure. like when piston rings get bad in an engine and it starts burning off oil. exept in this case its not such an obvious problem. its just my suggestion, I could be wrong.
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: East Tennesse
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
Being able to lock them up isn't really an appropriate indication of performance. That's just 'shocking' the tires enough to break traction. The reason for the superiority of the larger rotors/calipers is that the larger rotors shed heat faster as well as act as a longer 'arm'. When the caliper is further from the hub, the more leverage it has to stop the rotation. Also, larger calipers with more pistons offer larger surface area on the pads, allowing for more bite. The combination of these attributes means that the brakes can handle more heat cycles and still dissapate the heat and the brakes will go longer without over heating.
My recent LS1 front brake upgrade with OEM pads stops alot harder than stock from higher speeds. I can even induce rear brake hop from 75-80 and up- something I couldn't do before. But, the OEM pads (even with the larger front brakes) don't allow for the same hard-bite stopping from less than 10-15 mph as the Hawks HPS I had did. I'm thinking about putting the Hawks Ceramics on the front to match the new rear pads at some point.
That being said, for just street driving, new stock parts coupled with new fluid (with no air) and good performance pads can provide a decent stopping car. I ran the stock fronts with Hawks HPS and the 89+ disks with HPS for years and had plenty of hot runs on the mountains and some ~ one minute auto-x runs without issues.
My recent LS1 front brake upgrade with OEM pads stops alot harder than stock from higher speeds. I can even induce rear brake hop from 75-80 and up- something I couldn't do before. But, the OEM pads (even with the larger front brakes) don't allow for the same hard-bite stopping from less than 10-15 mph as the Hawks HPS I had did. I'm thinking about putting the Hawks Ceramics on the front to match the new rear pads at some point.
That being said, for just street driving, new stock parts coupled with new fluid (with no air) and good performance pads can provide a decent stopping car. I ran the stock fronts with Hawks HPS and the 89+ disks with HPS for years and had plenty of hot runs on the mountains and some ~ one minute auto-x runs without issues.
#27
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Formula Firebird
Engine: L98 with headers/exhaust
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10-bolt
Re: Do 3rdGen 4WDiscs Suck THAT Bad?
Yah, I'm beginning to think that maybe there is a problem somewhere in the system as there is no way 4-wheel discs can feel this sloppy. I'm going to have it looked at and I'll post the findings. I still might go LS1 fronts...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tyeo098
Tech / General Engine
38
11-30-2015 06:27 PM
355tpipickup
Tech / General Engine
9
09-13-2015 11:35 PM