coil overs
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Windsor Ontario
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: 2005 5.3L, LS6 Cam
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: DTS 9" 3.50 TrueTrac
Re: coil overs
http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-...dy/Suspension/
Whats the reason behind wanting to go coilover? As in Street/street/auto-x? I contemplated it and ended up going with Ground-Control Weight jacks and Koni yellows after reading everyones opinions.
Coilovers limit front tire size, and also add stress to the front shock towers. Depending on what kits you get they also limit how low you can lower the car without bottoming out the struts.
Jay
Whats the reason behind wanting to go coilover? As in Street/street/auto-x? I contemplated it and ended up going with Ground-Control Weight jacks and Koni yellows after reading everyones opinions.
Coilovers limit front tire size, and also add stress to the front shock towers. Depending on what kits you get they also limit how low you can lower the car without bottoming out the struts.
Jay
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Windsor Ontario
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: 2005 5.3L, LS6 Cam
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: DTS 9" 3.50 TrueTrac
Re: coil overs
Ground Controls weight jacks are basically the idea of Coilovers but doing it with a shorter spring in a stock location. Its more of a circle track thing. But most of the guys here that auto-x go with them over coilovers.
Here is the cheapest site, but call ground-control direct if you go this way and price match.
The picture shown shows the rear. The fronts are a different setup. If you do some searching on here you will find many pics. For some reason their site wont load up for me.
http://www.sparktecmotorsports.com/gc-2505-01.html
If you need to get a better idea search "weight jacks" Ground Control is just the brand that makes them for 82-92 fbodys.
Hope this helps.
Jay
Here is the cheapest site, but call ground-control direct if you go this way and price match.
The picture shown shows the rear. The fronts are a different setup. If you do some searching on here you will find many pics. For some reason their site wont load up for me.
http://www.sparktecmotorsports.com/gc-2505-01.html
If you need to get a better idea search "weight jacks" Ground Control is just the brand that makes them for 82-92 fbodys.
Hope this helps.
Jay
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: coil overs
Ground Control's website gives the appearance that only a pair (2) is included in their price, do you know if it's a full set or a pair? I emailed their customer service two days ago and haven't heard back.
#6
Supreme Member
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,651
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes
on
44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: coil overs
Gcfi only sells the complete kit ( most of the time) 400 ish bucks for the front and rear with your choice of spring rate.
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Windsor Ontario
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: 2005 5.3L, LS6 Cam
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: DTS 9" 3.50 TrueTrac
Re: coil overs
Jay
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
Re: coil overs
Gotcha, guess I never got the response PM from you. I think I'm going to pick up a full set of Koni yellows in about two weeks and then if I don't like how it rides with the Hotchkis springs that are currently on it, I'm going to get the weight jacks from GC. Thanks!
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Re: coil overs
http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-...dy/Suspension/
Whats the reason behind wanting to go coilover? As in Street/street/auto-x? I contemplated it and ended up going with Ground-Control Weight jacks and Koni yellows after reading everyones opinions.
Coilovers limit front tire size, and also add stress to the front shock towers. Depending on what kits you get they also limit how low you can lower the car without bottoming out the struts.
Jay
Whats the reason behind wanting to go coilover? As in Street/street/auto-x? I contemplated it and ended up going with Ground-Control Weight jacks and Koni yellows after reading everyones opinions.
Coilovers limit front tire size, and also add stress to the front shock towers. Depending on what kits you get they also limit how low you can lower the car without bottoming out the struts.
Jay
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
http://www.spohn.net/shop/1982-1992-...dy/Suspension/
Whats the reason behind wanting to go coilover? As in Street/street/auto-x? I contemplated it and ended up going with Ground-Control Weight jacks and Koni yellows after reading everyones opinions.
Coilovers limit front tire size, and also add stress to the front shock towers. Depending on what kits you get they also limit how low you can lower the car without bottoming out the struts.
Jay
Whats the reason behind wanting to go coilover? As in Street/street/auto-x? I contemplated it and ended up going with Ground-Control Weight jacks and Koni yellows after reading everyones opinions.
Coilovers limit front tire size, and also add stress to the front shock towers. Depending on what kits you get they also limit how low you can lower the car without bottoming out the struts.
Jay
yep, full set of 4 springs and adjusters. Mine were $499 at my door. if you have a 3rd or 4th gen differential matters to whether you need the slash cut rear adjuster or not. GC aren't real good about getting back to you. They have a good product and will take care of the customer but for some reason you have to contact them.
#11
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
You have to admit you couldn't fit 315's like pablo with coil overs.
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: O'Fallon, MO
Posts: 6,258
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 convertible built 3/1/1990
Engine: Cammed 6.0L LSX
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: custom Ford 8.8", 4.10 gears
yep, full set of 4 springs and adjusters. Mine were $499 at my door. if you have a 3rd or 4th gen differential matters to whether you need the slash cut rear adjuster or not. GC aren't real good about getting back to you. They have a good product and will take care of the customer but for some reason you have to contact them.
#13
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
https://www.thirdgen.org/forums/susp...gc-weight.html
Here is a picture of mine slash cut by Ground Control.
[IMG][/IMG]
I feel like i've hijacked this thread.
SORRY scarbucket!
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Re: coil overs
Could you post some pics that show tire to strut clearance and pics showing stance? After all the things i've read about coilovers on our cars i'm always curious to here about the few success stories. Do you track you car?
You have to admit you couldn't fit 315's like pablo with coil overs.
You have to admit you couldn't fit 315's like pablo with coil overs.
Anyways, here is the stance
Umm dont mind the wheel wells. I need to detail them again. It has been a few years since I've done it. Been messing around with my 04 GTO to much.
and the height of the clearance around the tire. Its about 1.25"
#16
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
Damn, thats hot!! Are those tombstones all the mustangs that tried their luck against ya?
Looks really good, with good clearance. I just got the same wheels on my donor car. What spacers are you using? What brakes do you have? No rubbing?
I still wonder about the strength of the strut towers under autoX/RR conditions with a coil over set up. I don't know pesonally but I read enough to scare me away from coilovers to weight jacks.
Looks really good, with good clearance. I just got the same wheels on my donor car. What spacers are you using? What brakes do you have? No rubbing?
I still wonder about the strength of the strut towers under autoX/RR conditions with a coil over set up. I don't know pesonally but I read enough to scare me away from coilovers to weight jacks.
Last edited by plum92_camaro; 01-01-2014 at 11:39 AM.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Re: coil overs
I've had the coil overs since April 06. Prolly have a total of 40k on them now. I've driven the car all over the place, Florida and back (2500 ish mile trip), back and forth to work everyday, fun runs, drag raced the **** outta the car. Im sure that I've treated the car worse than you'd see on a auto x course on the street.
The worst problems that I've had was when I went to the QA1 struts and blew two sets of them out and went back to Koni's. Other than that, everything has been great.
The worst problems that I've had was when I went to the QA1 struts and blew two sets of them out and went back to Koni's. Other than that, everything has been great.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
A lot of drag racers on this site use coil overs. they also can run tublular k-members that wouldn't survive AutoX/RR. Drag racing and AutoX/RR are apples and oranges.
#19
Re: coil overs
I wouldn't want to fit 315's anyways. The roads around Philadelphia are crap. I'm pretty sure that you could with the right adapters/spacers. Nope don't road track the car and the last time I was at a drag strip, they told me come back with a roll bar. 111.50-11.80's in a vert is a big no no. haha
Anyways, here is the stance
Umm dont mind the wheel wells. I need to detail them again. It has been a few years since I've done it. Been messing around with my 04 GTO to much.
and the height of the clearance around the tire. Its about 1.25"
Anyways, here is the stance
Umm dont mind the wheel wells. I need to detail them again. It has been a few years since I've done it. Been messing around with my 04 GTO to much.
and the height of the clearance around the tire. Its about 1.25"
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Re: coil overs
plum92_camaro
The color is Copperhead Metallic from PPG. When I was painting the car I saw a episode of Trucks when he was hosting it and he just got done the 68?!? C10 truck that he had Kevin Tetz paint.
http://staceydavid.com/projects/copperhead
The mix is on the page.
As for a coil over kit. Spohn's with whatever spring rate you think ya want. I had the 325 lb's and it was too much for me (no AC, AL heads, stripped of unnecessary weight blah blah) and put in a set of 275lb springs. They are perfect for what "I" want.
Shocks/Struts Koni Yellow's.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Re: coil overs
Compared to weight jacks, for road race/autocross type scenarios Im not really seeing the advantage of coil overs. The ride quality will probably be a little nicer, but there's no way that strut tower is as strong as the k-member. Maybe with a beefy strut tower brace, maybe it'd be okay...
But like I said, there's not much real advantage to it. The strut towers are made of flimsy stamped metal on flimsy stamped fender wells with a little flimsy stamped cap on it. Weight jacks will accomplish exactly the same thing while preserving the factory layout, putting all the loads into places they were designed to go.
The strut tower is designed to take "vertical" loads from the strut that does nothing more than dampen spring oscillation. The amount of force put into the strut tower, that GM designed it for, are nowhere near what you're going to see with coilovers, and the strut has a lot more leverage on the spring so even the full damping force on the spring isn't nearly as high as the actual force the spring is exerting.
GM specifically moved the springs to their new location. That's why they call these "modified mcpherson strut" cars. That's what's "modified" about them. They specifically removed the springs to put them farther inboard to rest against the k-member. This is partially because then you would be able to install the engine and front suspension from underneath the car. The manufacturing process simplifies itself. But in the process I've got no doubt that they designed the strut mount area to bear the forces of the strut pulling and pushing on it, not the weight of the whole front of the car.
For a drag car I think it's a great idea, for a street/road race/autocross car I think if you had more people using them you'd start seeing a lot more failures. Although to be fair the kinds of "failures" we're talking about here are rarely going to be springs flying through the hood. It's probably going to be more of a chassis rigidity issue in relation to suspension components. The strut towers are going to be moving around in high-g situations and they'll likely revert right back to where they were when you check them in a static situation. For a while at least. But the more they flex and move the more easily they will move. I think it's a safety issue, but I think from a performance standpoint the decrease in unsprung weight is counteracted by the decrease in rigidity of critical suspension mounting points.
Most of the American Iron or NASA Camaro/Mustang Challenge guys dont bother with coilovers. Very few on here have. Weight jacks are far, far more common.
But like I said, there's not much real advantage to it. The strut towers are made of flimsy stamped metal on flimsy stamped fender wells with a little flimsy stamped cap on it. Weight jacks will accomplish exactly the same thing while preserving the factory layout, putting all the loads into places they were designed to go.
The strut tower is designed to take "vertical" loads from the strut that does nothing more than dampen spring oscillation. The amount of force put into the strut tower, that GM designed it for, are nowhere near what you're going to see with coilovers, and the strut has a lot more leverage on the spring so even the full damping force on the spring isn't nearly as high as the actual force the spring is exerting.
GM specifically moved the springs to their new location. That's why they call these "modified mcpherson strut" cars. That's what's "modified" about them. They specifically removed the springs to put them farther inboard to rest against the k-member. This is partially because then you would be able to install the engine and front suspension from underneath the car. The manufacturing process simplifies itself. But in the process I've got no doubt that they designed the strut mount area to bear the forces of the strut pulling and pushing on it, not the weight of the whole front of the car.
For a drag car I think it's a great idea, for a street/road race/autocross car I think if you had more people using them you'd start seeing a lot more failures. Although to be fair the kinds of "failures" we're talking about here are rarely going to be springs flying through the hood. It's probably going to be more of a chassis rigidity issue in relation to suspension components. The strut towers are going to be moving around in high-g situations and they'll likely revert right back to where they were when you check them in a static situation. For a while at least. But the more they flex and move the more easily they will move. I think it's a safety issue, but I think from a performance standpoint the decrease in unsprung weight is counteracted by the decrease in rigidity of critical suspension mounting points.
Most of the American Iron or NASA Camaro/Mustang Challenge guys dont bother with coilovers. Very few on here have. Weight jacks are far, far more common.
Last edited by InfernalVortex; 01-01-2014 at 03:13 PM.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: coil overs
Coilovers on a 3rd gen allow one to run a lower spring rate compared to a spring in pocket OEM arrangement. There is some reduction in weight, which can be maximized by using front tubular control arms without spring pockets.
#23
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Double Bratville
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: LS2
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: MW 3.42 12 Bolt
Re: coil overs
It's a good idea to add a plate under front towers and the rear shock mount, just for good measure. I did go with rear coil-overs - NOT fronts.
#25
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Double Bratville
Posts: 1,617
Likes: 0
Received 42 Likes
on
31 Posts
Car: '89 Formula
Engine: LS2
Transmission: 4L65E
Axle/Gears: MW 3.42 12 Bolt
Re: coil overs
Coil-overs in rear to get rid of rake is one way, and gives continuous easy ongoing adj.
If just getting rid of rake, cut coils - cheaper, easier, one afternoon. If you need to "get it just right," doing this in the rear is not as bad as the front.
Weight jacks in front and coil-overs in rear gives you continuous, easy adjustment. If your goal is to learn, adjust, and improve - go this route up front, and you'll never regret it.
If your goal is "just basically wanna..." - cut the springs.
#27
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z red t-top
Engine: Nothing much
Transmission: I wish t56
Axle/Gears: 9bolt 3.27 4sale
Re: coil overs
Is there any failures with front coil overs? My car will see street time but its a drag car. I can add some extra welds on the strut towers. With a block that weighs 216 lbs (lq4) i want to remove as much weight as possible.
#28
Re: coil overs
i also got GCWJ and koni yellows based on HOURS of reading on this site. i wanted my suspension to be AutoX/RR ready but still street able. I looked at coil overs for a while but decided against them for the same reasons as jay_rich.
yep, full set of 4 springs and adjusters. Mine were $499 at my door. if you have a 3rd or 4th gen differential matters to whether you need the slash cut rear adjuster or not. GC aren't real good about getting back to you. They have a good product and will take care of the customer but for some reason you have to contact them.
yep, full set of 4 springs and adjusters. Mine were $499 at my door. if you have a 3rd or 4th gen differential matters to whether you need the slash cut rear adjuster or not. GC aren't real good about getting back to you. They have a good product and will take care of the customer but for some reason you have to contact them.
#29
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
Hope this helps. My complete setup is listed in my vB garage.
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
I just don't recommend coil overs for autoX/road racing. The big dogs of autoX/road racing on here don't use coil overs.
#31
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Re: coil overs
I was also looking at coil overs as I'm swapping to a race craft moly.K-member. Race craft has a $300 kit for coil overs with springs. I was piecing together my own front weight jack system with AFCO parts and I was around $300-350 without shipping but that included coil springs for the front and rear.
Coil overs are easy to install but as stated.put alot of stress on the towers. I already fully TIG welded the strut towers for added strength. It's an option. But for a daily driver I wonder if the coil overs is a bad idea.
So a good question would be... are the coil overs a bad idea for a street car, as compared to an autox or drag car. My car will never be autox and rarely drag raced but it does have a 521 BBF in the engine bay.
Any suggest spring rates for coil over and weight jacks? Right now has cut moog 5664s for 2" drop and 900lb rate. Rear are 200 lb. It's too rough on the street I think.
Coil overs are easy to install but as stated.put alot of stress on the towers. I already fully TIG welded the strut towers for added strength. It's an option. But for a daily driver I wonder if the coil overs is a bad idea.
So a good question would be... are the coil overs a bad idea for a street car, as compared to an autox or drag car. My car will never be autox and rarely drag raced but it does have a 521 BBF in the engine bay.
Any suggest spring rates for coil over and weight jacks? Right now has cut moog 5664s for 2" drop and 900lb rate. Rear are 200 lb. It's too rough on the street I think.
#32
Re: coil overs
I was also looking at coil overs as I'm swapping to a race craft moly.K-member. Race craft has a $300 kit for coil overs with springs. I was piecing together my own front weight jack system with AFCO parts and I was around $300-350 without shipping but that included coil springs for the front and rear.
Coil overs are easy to install but as stated.put alot of stress on the towers. I already fully TIG welded the strut towers for added strength. It's an option. But for a daily driver I wonder if the coil overs is a bad idea.
So a good question would be... are the coil overs a bad idea for a street car, as compared to an autox or drag car. My car will never be autox and rarely drag raced but it does have a 521 BBF in the engine bay.
Any suggest spring rates for coil over and weight jacks? Right now has cut moog 5664s for 2" drop and 900lb rate. Rear are 200 lb. It's too rough on the street I think.
Coil overs are easy to install but as stated.put alot of stress on the towers. I already fully TIG welded the strut towers for added strength. It's an option. But for a daily driver I wonder if the coil overs is a bad idea.
So a good question would be... are the coil overs a bad idea for a street car, as compared to an autox or drag car. My car will never be autox and rarely drag raced but it does have a 521 BBF in the engine bay.
Any suggest spring rates for coil over and weight jacks? Right now has cut moog 5664s for 2" drop and 900lb rate. Rear are 200 lb. It's too rough on the street I think.
#33
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt w3.42 Torsen
Re: coil overs
Guess the next question would be how tall do i want the spring? is there measurements i can take? We will be on a wide 18 and the kid wants the car low. My last ground controls on my honda i could drop that thing hard, and then when i took it on long trips i could raise it up fairly easy and be at a very comfortable ride height. Out of my element on these camaros.
#34
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Re: coil overs
Thats the thing, I have Spohn's, coil over tube k member also in the car along with the a-arms. I've hit plenty of pot holes, **** roads cut 1.5 60's and just recently took it off for a stock one so I can get it re powder coated and try out a pro kit. It looks almost exactly the same as it did when I put it in there 6 years ago. With my abuse on the car it has held up just fine. Even after putting the rear of the car into a wall coming home from the track one night... :/ Apparently rain and drag radials don't mix. haha
plum92_camaro
The color is Copperhead Metallic from PPG. When I was painting the car I saw a episode of Trucks when he was hosting it and he just got done the 68?!? C10 truck that he had Kevin Tetz paint.
http://staceydavid.com/projects/copperhead
The mix is on the page.
As for a coil over kit. Spohn's with whatever spring rate you think ya want. I had the 325 lb's and it was too much for me (no AC, AL heads, stripped of unnecessary weight blah blah) and put in a set of 275lb springs. They are perfect for what "I" want.
Shocks/Struts Koni Yellow's.
plum92_camaro
The color is Copperhead Metallic from PPG. When I was painting the car I saw a episode of Trucks when he was hosting it and he just got done the 68?!? C10 truck that he had Kevin Tetz paint.
http://staceydavid.com/projects/copperhead
The mix is on the page.
As for a coil over kit. Spohn's with whatever spring rate you think ya want. I had the 325 lb's and it was too much for me (no AC, AL heads, stripped of unnecessary weight blah blah) and put in a set of 275lb springs. They are perfect for what "I" want.
Shocks/Struts Koni Yellow's.
Anyway I mocked it up and ride height at lowest position was close if not even with my cut moog 5664s. In the process of getting spacers for the caster/camber plates and a spring cup for the coil over spring. My hot part camber plates are 5" in DIA not the 3" like spohnS so they slop around.
Also thinking of enlarging the opening of the shock tower to accommodate more adjustment.
What about a shorter spring and a spacer off the caster plate with a spring cup so the spring is lower than the tower opening allowing full adjustment. But now that I think of it the top of the strut is awfully close to the tower opening.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
06-13-2021 01:13 PM
lt1z350
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Wanted
0
08-23-2015 08:33 PM