Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
I recently bought an 86 IROC and it actually has the externally mounted rear brake light as referenced for the 350 of that year (of which only like 50 were made). I highly doubt it actually has the 350 L98 engine, but how can I determine for sure what engine is in it?
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
Not sure where you heard the 3rd brake light designated the 350. The 3rd brake light was a federally mandated requirement for 1986. All 1986 and newer cars have them. Having it on the rear glass was only 86 for the IROC-Z. As for the engine, I can guarantee that if the car is original, it has the LB9 or the LG4. If it looks like a carb setup, then it's an LG4. If it has the TPI setup with dual air intake, then you have the LB9. There were no 350s in 1986.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1986 Iroc Z28
Engine: LG4 5.0
Transmission: 700 R4
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
lol No, 1986 was the only year camaros (all of them, irocs, Z28s, sport coupes, etc) had the 3rd brake light on the rear window. That's the biggest way to distinguish them.
If you want to know your engine size, check the RPO codes in the center console.
Actually, there were 50 5.7 irocs made. Those were mainly for testing though. The 350 wasn't offered in the iroc until 87.
I'm sure a couple of those rare 86 350s are on the road, but I didn't see the RPO code for that engine for that year.
Here's a great site to research 3rd gen codes, if you didn't know already. This is the link to the "about 86 camaros":
http://www.camarosource.ca/php/camar....php?year=1986
If you want to know your engine size, check the RPO codes in the center console.
Actually, there were 50 5.7 irocs made. Those were mainly for testing though. The 350 wasn't offered in the iroc until 87.
I'm sure a couple of those rare 86 350s are on the road, but I didn't see the RPO code for that engine for that year.
Here's a great site to research 3rd gen codes, if you didn't know already. This is the link to the "about 86 camaros":
http://www.camarosource.ca/php/camar....php?year=1986
Last edited by blue_roc; May 7, 2007 at 05:44 PM.
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
Aah, that makes sense... the wording of the article at https://www.thirdgen.org/1986-chevy-camaro confused me. I thought it meant that was the distinguishing mark for the 305's... At least I knew it was a stupid question 
There WERE, however, 50 made... and I doubt they got crushed so they must be out there somewhere...
As to the RPO codes, I would have checked them but the sticker isn't there... it is an IROC Z with TPI injection and an automatic transmission tho, so that pretty much tells me it's the 305 LB9 yes?

There WERE, however, 50 made... and I doubt they got crushed so they must be out there somewhere...
As to the RPO codes, I would have checked them but the sticker isn't there... it is an IROC Z with TPI injection and an automatic transmission tho, so that pretty much tells me it's the 305 LB9 yes?
Junior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1986 Iroc Z28
Engine: LG4 5.0
Transmission: 700 R4
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
Aah, that makes sense... the wording of the article at https://www.thirdgen.org/1986-chevy-camaro confused me. I thought it meant that was the distinguishing mark for the 305's... At least I knew it was a stupid question 
There WERE, however, 50 made... and I doubt they got crushed so they must be out there somewhere...
As to the RPO codes, I would have checked them but the sticker isn't there... it is an IROC Z with TPI injection and an automatic transmission tho, so that pretty much tells me it's the 305 LB9 yes?

There WERE, however, 50 made... and I doubt they got crushed so they must be out there somewhere...
As to the RPO codes, I would have checked them but the sticker isn't there... it is an IROC Z with TPI injection and an automatic transmission tho, so that pretty much tells me it's the 305 LB9 yes?
If it's a tpi, then you have LB9.
But good luck, and congrats on the new car!
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Junior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1986 Iroc Z28
Engine: LG4 5.0
Transmission: 700 R4
Trending Topics
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
There are not 50 86 350s out there somewhere. If there were 50 made, they are all crushed. As prototype cars, they are not street legal and can't be sold to the public to be driven. On a forum of about 50k members, no one has yet proven the existance of an 86 350.
There were 3 engine options, however, since only 74 L69s were produced in 86, I doubt this car is one of them leaving the LB9 or the LG4 as the 2 most common engine options.
Junior Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Car: 1986 Iroc Z28
Engine: LG4 5.0
Transmission: 700 R4
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
If you read how I worded that, I stated that the 3rd brake light was mounted on the rear window for the IROC-Z in 1986 only. In 87, MOST Camaros had it relocated to the rear spoiler, IROC-Z included. But if there wasn't a rear spoiler on the car in 87, guess where the light went! Since we are also talking about an 86 IROC-Z and not other Camaro models, my original statement was correct and accurate. "Having it on the rear glass was only 86 for the IROC-Z."
I'm new, obviously. I mainly only know what I read researching Irocs, before I got mine.
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
Wow. I have a dream... A dream where someday people stop believing the 50 1986 L98 Iroc's myth...
Someone should go around to every history write up and petition to have that tidbit removed. They MIGHT have existed at one time, as prototypes for emissions testing, etc but they wouldn't have been titled, and would have never been sold due to liability. GM probably crushed them or recycled the parts through to other test operations, like crash testing.
Someone should go around to every history write up and petition to have that tidbit removed. They MIGHT have existed at one time, as prototypes for emissions testing, etc but they wouldn't have been titled, and would have never been sold due to liability. GM probably crushed them or recycled the parts through to other test operations, like crash testing.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
You could, but then someone would just dig up one of the magazine articles where the press was allowed to test drive those cars on a closed track, and the whole thing would start over again. Kind of like the rumors that the 9 bolt was going to be stronger than the Dana 44.
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 11
From: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
Doesn't seem to stop anyone from parroting 25 year old rumors and heresay, though.
I bet GM has every one of those 50 cars hiding away in storage alongside the 1983 Corvettes, to be presented to our new rulers on the day when the ***** spring forth from their secret base on the dark side of the moon build with captured alien UFO technology to attack with an array of Nikola Tesla's death ray canons and enslave the human race.
I bet GM has every one of those 50 cars hiding away in storage alongside the 1983 Corvettes, to be presented to our new rulers on the day when the ***** spring forth from their secret base on the dark side of the moon build with captured alien UFO technology to attack with an array of Nikola Tesla's death ray canons and enslave the human race.
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
Considering how badly cluster-****ed the tech data is these days, it's really no wonder that no one can figure out what the hell it's trying to say. Since it started out as a 1967-1994 examination, with each years details building upon the previous years details, and now it's chopped into one year at a time, it's completely retarded and pointless. Someone needs to jiggle the handle, wait till the tank is full, and give it a good solid flush. Time to dump that hackjob and start from scratch.
/soapbox.
/soapbox.
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 860
Likes: 1
From: Tallahassee, Florida
Car: '86 Trans Am and '03 S-10
Engine: 355ci and 4.3l
Transmission: 700R4 and NV3500
Axle/Gears: 7.625/3.42 Auburn and 8.5/3.08 Gov-
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
L69 HOs had a dual snorkel intake...LG4s had a single drivers side sorkel.
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
A friend of my dad knew an executive at GM, and he ordered an aluminum 427 tri-power drivetrain in his '86 IROC. The RPO sheet contains an entry that reads "BBC", as in big block Chevy. He's thinking of taking it to BJ next year, but is arguing about not being able to set a $100K reserve.
Mike M
Okay, we all know that is BS ... But it's still a great story
Mike M
Okay, we all know that is BS ... But it's still a great story
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 4
From: Beaufort South Carolina
Car: 1983 Camaro Z/28
Engine: LU5 305 CFI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: J65/G80/G92-3.23
Re: Stupid question regarding 86 IROC
LOL...That is a good story Mike.And it is somewhat true to the point,as you probably know,GM built/builds test mules for emissions,safety,feasibility and durability testing in house and also to be sent to the EPA,DOT and NHTSA.But as Scottmoyer pointed out most of those are either crushed or destroyed in the various test.One can only imagine what the engineers come up with that we never see.
On the original motor in a '86 IROC check the eighth digit of the VIN; H = LG4 305 carb,G = L69 305 HO carb(only 74 listed as built in '86) or F= LB9 305 TPI.
On the original motor in a '86 IROC check the eighth digit of the VIN; H = LG4 305 carb,G = L69 305 HO carb(only 74 listed as built in '86) or F= LB9 305 TPI.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustangman65_79
Body
3
Aug 11, 2015 03:17 PM









