History / Originality Got a question about 1982-1992 Camaro or Firebird history? Have a question about original parts, options, RPO codes, when something was available, or how to document your car? Those questions, answers, and much more!

This a true iroc?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2021 | 11:57 AM
  #1  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
This a true iroc?

Been inquiring about this car for some time now. I took a look at the RPO codes and can’t figure out if it’s a true IROC. It’s got the Z28 Code but no B4Z. It’s an 87.
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 12:03 PM
  #2  
JT's Avatar
JT
Community Administrator
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,462
Likes: 290
Re: This a true iroc?

For 1987, it should have the B4Z code if it's an IROC on top of the Z28 code. This changed in 1988 where the B4Z code was no longer used and just Z28 was used.

So, no, based on the RPO sticker this car is not an IROC.
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 12:05 PM
  #3  
randyhummel's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Feb 2020
Posts: 228
Likes: 42
From: Tiffin, Ohio
Car: 1986 Iroc-z, 1968 Camaro RS-ss
Engine: 305, 396
Transmission: auto
Re: This a true iroc?

sorry forget that don't see 16" wheel size any place so no not an iroc-z

Last edited by randyhummel; May 7, 2021 at 12:20 PM.
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 01:18 PM
  #4  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by JT
For 1987, it should have the B4Z code if it's an IROC on top of the Z28 code. This changed in 1988 where the B4Z code was no longer used and just Z28 was used.

So, no, based on the RPO sticker this car is not an IROC.
Thank you for confirming my suspicions. Happy I could catch it before I potentially look at it. Here’s the link to it. What do you think? https://www.kijijiautos.ca/cars/chev...p#vip=20193563
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
ironwill's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 565
Car: 1986 IROC Z
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by BDiano
I think the seller is either ignorant or a crook. Either way, you'd do well to pass on this car; if something as basic as a major option package is being misrepresented, it puts all other facts about the car, as stated by the seller, in question.
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 04:06 PM
  #6  
chazman's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 9,937
Likes: 636
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1989 IROC-Z. Original owner
Engine: LB9. Dual Cats. Big Cam
Transmission: World Class T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 3.45
Re: This a true iroc?

As has been mentioned, NOT an IROC. Could be a cool car. At least it has a 3.23 gear. Just don't pay IROC money for it.
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by ironwill
I think the seller is either ignorant or a crook. Either way, you'd do well to pass on this car; if something as basic as a major option package is being misrepresented, it puts all other facts about the car, as stated by the seller, in question.
I was starting to lead to that. He also claims it has a 350. If that proves true (I’ve asked for casting numbers and suffix codes). And is actually rust free, it may be decent. If all goes well, it may be a very good way to knock the price down.
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 06:28 PM
  #8  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by chazman
As has been mentioned, NOT an IROC. Could be a cool car. At least it has a 3.23 gear. Just don't pay IROC money for it.
It could be great leverage to knock the price down. I’d have to prove some other claims, (Rust free, 350 Small block). I appreciate the opinion.
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 07:37 PM
  #9  
OrangeBird's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,939
Likes: 801
Car: 1989 Firebird
Re: This a true iroc?

Just remember this; If the seller starts throwing that nasty "C" word around (You know, "Corvette" ) , run for the hills !!!

If even half of the Camaros & Firebirds that sellers lie and say have a "Corvette Engine" in them actually had a real engine from a Corvette, there wouldn't be ANY running Corvettes left in the world
Reply
Old May 7, 2021 | 08:43 PM
  #10  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by OrangeBird
Just remember this; If the seller starts throwing that nasty "C" word around (You know, "Corvette" ) , run for the hills !!!

If even half of the Camaros & Firebirds that sellers lie and say have a "Corvette Engine" in them actually had a real engine from a Corvette, there wouldn't be ANY running Corvettes left in the world
Funny you said that. Because that’s what he said, “The engine from cross referencing parts is from a 70s vette”. This looks like a father son project that was going on for a few years, but the kid is somewhat clueless. Had no clue what RPO codes was. I don’t know what to believe anymore lol.
Reply
Old May 8, 2021 | 06:52 AM
  #11  
ironwill's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 565
Car: 1986 IROC Z
Engine: 5.0 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 Posi
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by BDiano
I was starting to lead to that. He also claims it has a 350. If that proves true (I’ve asked for casting numbers and suffix codes). And is actually rust free, it may be decent. If all goes well, it may be a very good way to knock the price down.
If the engine's origin is questionable, in that case just consider it to be a run-of-the-mill small block, adding no real additional value to the car.

What is most important is the condition of the body and undercarriage; get it up on a lift and inspect everything underneath. Even if the car is relatively rust-free, it's still going to need some body work and a complete repaint, not an inexpensive undertaking. That in itself will keep most buyers away.




Originally Posted by BDiano
I don’t know what to believe anymore lol.
Believe your own eyes. Discount anything said by the seller that can't be substantiated.


Whatever you decide, GL.
Reply
Old May 8, 2021 | 08:50 AM
  #12  
Aaron R.'s Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 311
From: Missouri
Car: 1985 Z28
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: This a true iroc?

If it's not rusty and runs good that is probably a fair price. I didnt see anywhere in the ad claiming to be IROC. I would just ignore any claims and go look at it to decide if it is worth that price to you. Big issue is always hidden rust.
Reply
Old May 8, 2021 | 10:43 AM
  #13  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by ironwill
If the engine's origin is questionable, in that case just consider it to be a run-of-the-mill small block, adding no real additional value to the car.

What is most important is the condition of the body and undercarriage; get it up on a lift and inspect everything underneath. Even if the car is relatively rust-free, it's still going to need some body work and a complete repaint, not an inexpensive undertaking. That in itself will keep most buyers away.





Believe your own eyes. Discount anything said by the seller that can't be substantiated.


Whatever you decide, GL.
Again, I really appreciate the help and opinions. My main goal is finding a car without rust. I had to get rid of my Berlinetta because I thought I could cheaply win against it, I was way wrong. A 350 would be a great bonus, especially for this price point.
Reply
Old May 8, 2021 | 10:47 AM
  #14  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by Aaron R.
If it's not rusty and runs good that is probably a fair price. I didnt see anywhere in the ad claiming to be IROC. I would just ignore any claims and go look at it to decide if it is worth that price to you. Big issue is always hidden rust.
True on the rust, that’s what forced me to get rid of my Berlinetta. I learned the bad spots on these cars after playing around with that other car. Thankfully this one is a car from a province that’s less known for brutal salt roads. The ad originally said IROC. I kindly told him it was not based of the missing RPO code, he took it almost too nice and just changed the ad. The car has small IROC decals on the bottom of the doors. It doesn’t sound like he knows too much. Thanks for your input.
Reply
Old May 11, 2021 | 10:41 AM
  #15  
RKeats's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 608
Likes: 147
From: Oakville, Ontario
Car: 1991 GTA T-Top / 2014 Mustang GT
Engine: 5L TPI
Transmission: WCT5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: This a true iroc?

Someone got hella sweaty in those back seats.
Reply
Old May 11, 2021 | 11:13 AM
  #16  
BDiano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by RKeats
Someone got hella sweaty in those back seats.
He claims weathering. But I have never seen anything like that before.
Reply
Old May 11, 2021 | 03:19 PM
  #17  
DynoDave43's Avatar
Supreme Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 4,815
Likes: 906
From: MICHIGAN
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt 2.73 Open
Re: This a true iroc?

Originally Posted by BDiano
He claims weathering. But I have never seen anything like that before.
Indeed. And gross to boot.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
87zeder
History / Originality
4
Oct 21, 2015 09:16 AM
gsxrfann
History / Originality
26
Mar 1, 2012 10:16 PM
T-Top Tony
History / Originality
10
Feb 14, 2010 02:56 AM
jmiller
Northern California
11
Feb 28, 2005 02:46 PM
Mark A Shields
History / Originality
8
Jan 16, 2002 04:46 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:35 PM.