Multiple cars in profile
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Multiple cars in profile
I have seen several members with multiple cars listed under their avatar. I always thought they just put a lot of spaces in and filled in the rest of the info in the reansmission field, but when I tried doing that, it didnt work. Is there some sort of invisible character you have to use, or what? 
TGO Supporter
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Re: Multiple cars in profile
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
I have seen several members with multiple cars listed under their avatar. I always thought they just put a lot of spaces in and filled in the rest of the info in the reansmission field, but when I tried doing that, it didnt work. Is there some sort of invisible character you have to use, or what?
I have seen several members with multiple cars listed under their avatar. I always thought they just put a lot of spaces in and filled in the rest of the info in the reansmission field, but when I tried doing that, it didnt work. Is there some sort of invisible character you have to use, or what?
Also 305 u got PM mail 
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
been wondering the same thing for a while now ..
In CaysEs, all he did was use the correct amount of ····· in the transmission field after 700r4, then added the Car/Engine/Transmission and their appropriate info. You can do it without the ···· that CaysE used.
i actually think Iroc should put size limits in the fields. You can easily abuse this and screw the format. But that is not my decision.
i would then correctly add the extra fields for people who do own multiple F-bodies (such as myself) and make it optional. However, TGO may be waiting to do such when they upgrade to vB 3.x.
i actually think Iroc should put size limits in the fields. You can easily abuse this and screw the format. But that is not my decision.
i would then correctly add the extra fields for people who do own multiple F-bodies (such as myself) and make it optional. However, TGO may be waiting to do such when they upgrade to vB 3.x.
Last edited by JT; Jan 16, 2005 at 03:59 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 2
From: Your neighbor's hood, MD
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42:1
Originally posted by JT
i actually think Iroc should put size limits in the fields. You can easily abuse this and screw the format. But that is not my decision.
i would then correctly add the extra fields for people who do own multiple F-bodies (such as myself) and make it optional.
i actually think Iroc should put size limits in the fields. You can easily abuse this and screw the format. But that is not my decision.
i would then correctly add the extra fields for people who do own multiple F-bodies (such as myself) and make it optional.
Not a big deal though, just a scrolling annoyance.
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
40
Aug 21, 2015 02:12 PM