is this a good setup?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Car: '84 Camaro SC/ I-ROC Body Conversio
Engine: Rebuilt 350 5.7L, Edelbrock 750cfm
Transmission: Re-built 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser, 3.73
is this a good setup?
I got KYB GR-2 Gas shocks and KYB GR-2 Struts along with the Eibach Pro Kit Lowering Springs. Sound like a good set up to someone who knows something about suspension?
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Sounds fine to me.
The Eibach springs are much stiffer than stocks, and the KYBs are a great budget setup. I have stock Iroc springs (probably beyond worn), and newer KYB shocks/struts.
If I were you, the next mod I would plan on is LCAs and LCA relocator brackets - to further use the lower center of gravity.
The Eibach springs are much stiffer than stocks, and the KYBs are a great budget setup. I have stock Iroc springs (probably beyond worn), and newer KYB shocks/struts.
If I were you, the next mod I would plan on is LCAs and LCA relocator brackets - to further use the lower center of gravity.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Lower control arms.
They are a suspension piece that basically "throw" weight to the rear and down (straight line acceleration & cornering)
Basically, there are two fundamental problems with the stock LCAs. They are weak, and they are placed poorly. If you look at a stock LCA, it is only three-sided. A boxed LCA is much stronger because it closes all four sides. A LCA relocator bracket allows the LCA to be positioned better to more effectively utilize its purpose (weight distribution).
The next time you have an opportunity to look beneath the car, look at the area right before the rear wheels (either side). You'll see them, they are a prominent suspension piece.
They are a suspension piece that basically "throw" weight to the rear and down (straight line acceleration & cornering)
Basically, there are two fundamental problems with the stock LCAs. They are weak, and they are placed poorly. If you look at a stock LCA, it is only three-sided. A boxed LCA is much stronger because it closes all four sides. A LCA relocator bracket allows the LCA to be positioned better to more effectively utilize its purpose (weight distribution).
The next time you have an opportunity to look beneath the car, look at the area right before the rear wheels (either side). You'll see them, they are a prominent suspension piece.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,420
Likes: 5
From: Fort Mill, SC, USA
Car: '88 Iroc, '91 RS, and a '70 RS
Engine: 5.7 TPI; 5.0 TBI; ZZ4/T56 on the ag
Transmission: A4, A4, slated to be a T56
That's what I'm running and I love the ride. It's gonna be stiff but not so much that your kidneys will hurt.
Here's my setup. I used BMR parts (LCAs and panhard):
http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/tar...m/taramiller72
Good luck!
Ed
Here's my setup. I used BMR parts (LCAs and panhard):
http://f1.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/tar...m/taramiller72
Good luck!
Ed
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Car: 1984 Chevy Camaro
Engine: Built L98
Transmission: T-56 6 speed
I'd also get an adjustible panhard bar. Even with only a prokit drop my rear end shifted over about an inch or so. Not only does it look kinda stupid its not all that great for your car. A great company if you ever need suspension pieces is Spohn. Great parts.
Trending Topics
thats the exact combo i was running last year, it rode nice on the street, i was very happy with it for the money is cost....although some suspension things have to change over the winter
i would highly recommed the relocation brakets, LCA's, and an adjustable panhard bar....
i would highly recommed the relocation brakets, LCA's, and an adjustable panhard bar....
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Car: '84 Camaro SC/ I-ROC Body Conversio
Engine: Rebuilt 350 5.7L, Edelbrock 750cfm
Transmission: Re-built 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser, 3.73
I hear everyone saying how they are "adjustable" shocks and struts for different suspension combos... what do they mean and how do they do this? Is it just preference what stiffness you have them handling at?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Car: '84 Camaro SC/ I-ROC Body Conversio
Engine: Rebuilt 350 5.7L, Edelbrock 750cfm
Transmission: Re-built 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser, 3.73
Pskel350 -- That's one mean lookin hood. Is that flat part on top of the ramair openings custom or did you get the hood with that? Never sen them come like that before.
the hood is from ASCD. its not really ramair, its just painted so it looks like it is open
i just figured that if i had cut the hood open, the engine bay would have always been dirty.
adjustable means that you can adjust the stiffness of the strut/shock. that is why i have to say bye to my KYB/eibach combo this winter
i just figured that if i had cut the hood open, the engine bay would have always been dirty.adjustable means that you can adjust the stiffness of the strut/shock. that is why i have to say bye to my KYB/eibach combo this winter
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Car: '84 Camaro SC/ I-ROC Body Conversio
Engine: Rebuilt 350 5.7L, Edelbrock 750cfm
Transmission: Re-built 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser, 3.73
Why do you have to get rid of them bc of the fact that they are adjustable?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
From: VA, USA
Car: '84 Camaro SC/ I-ROC Body Conversio
Engine: Rebuilt 350 5.7L, Edelbrock 750cfm
Transmission: Re-built 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser, 3.73
Oh well I'm, not planning on takin it to the track this only for a daily driver, so it'a a good setup in that respect?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM
Street Lethal
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
Aug 13, 2015 08:28 PM




