Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

What since when did 255/50/16s rub in the front?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 09:51 AM
  #1  
88Camaro350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
What since when did 255/50/16s rub in the front?

Ok I just had some 255/50/16 kuhmo ecsta supra 712s put on my rims. I did not notice any rubbing at all for the first 4 days I had them. Last night I was pulling out of the driveway with my gf and I hear a nasty noise. It is rubbing bad. I can cut the wheel all the way to the left and let my car idle and it will stop the car.

Since when did a small tire like I have rub this baD?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #2  
hitman's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Car: 1992 25th Ann. Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI - Stock
Transmission: th700 r4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
I got the same size tires

although they are the phantoms from Discount TIre. To date I have never had that problem. I do get a slight rub in the wells, but hardly enough to stop my foward momentum in idle with wheel turned.

Hit any bad bumps, or have any alignment work done?
I'd be interested to know what would have caused this because I was looking at buying the same set of tires.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 02:00 PM
  #3  
Chris89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
From: Nashville TN
Car: 1989 Trans Am
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: Pro-Built 700r4 w/ 3400 converter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/ 3.42 gears
My stock 245/50s almost rub at full turn. The largest these things came w/ stock is the 245/50 and a 255/50 is both taller and wider than a 245/50, so the chance is there it will. I think its hit or miss really. Some guys w/ the 255s up front don't rub, but then some do.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #4  
MrDude_1's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 4
From: Charleston, SC
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Re: What since when did 255/50/16s rub in the front?

Originally posted by 88Camaro350
Ok I just had some 255/50/16 kuhmo ecsta supra 712s put on my rims. I did not notice any rubbing at all for the first 4 days I had them. Last night I was pulling out of the driveway with my gf and I hear a nasty noise. It is rubbing bad. I can cut the wheel all the way to the left and let my car idle and it will stop the car.

Since when did a small tire like I have rub this baD?

well, how heavy is your girlfriend? LMAO... im just messin with ya.




245s(stock) are close.... 255s will hit when you have max lock and you go up a incline. but never rub 99% of the time.
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 05:56 PM
  #5  
llvll4l2c91350's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,067
Likes: 1
Re: Re: What since when did 255/50/16s rub in the front?

Originally posted by MrDude_1
well, how heavy is your girlfriend? LMAO... im just messin with ya.
LOL
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 06:54 PM
  #6  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Did your car originally come with 15's?
Reply
Old Mar 17, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #7  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
run a 235/60/15. fills the wells real nice. im using that as my front and 295/50/15 in the back
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #8  
Pepsicola's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield, WI
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/eaton posi 3.73
My 235/60/15's rub in the front at full turn.....
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 06:38 PM
  #9  
buzz12586's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5 spd
I am getting 255/40/17's will they rub in the front???
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #10  
88Camaro350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Yes my car originally had 15's. Now I have 16'' TTII's.

BTW my girlfriend is 5' 9'' and 135lbs...that isn't the problem.

I may get two more tires....245/50/16s like I had before.

The kuhmo tires tread looks cool but i hate the way the sidewalls on them look...my dunlop sr sport 5000s looked way better I think. Maybe I should have stayed with 245/50/16s all around.

Oh well.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 07:35 PM
  #11  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
kumho makes junk. hankook makes junk. dont even bother looking at those 2 brands. lol and dont forget falken, they make junk also. cheap rubber. they think fancy tred patterns will make up for the rubber they use. all 3 make total junk
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 07:36 PM
  #12  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
Originally posted by buzz12586
I am getting 255/40/17's will they rub in the front???
i dont think they will. if they do it will be on hard cornoring
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #13  
buzz12586's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5 spd
Originally posted by Kontrax
i dont think they will. if they do it will be on hard cornoring

Sweet. Thats great news.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:37 PM
  #14  
buzz12586's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 5 spd
Originally posted by Kontrax
i dont think they will. if they do it will be on hard cornoring

Sweet. Thats great news.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:47 PM
  #15  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
The problem lies with you having 15's originally. The cars originally equipped with 16's have different stops to prevent rubbing.
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #16  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
ive never heard os a problem going different wheel sizes. people do it all the time around here, 15 to 16 or to 17... hell i must do a dozen cars a day that go from 14 to 17 at the shop
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #17  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by Kontrax
ive never heard os a problem going different wheel sizes. people do it all the time around here, 15 to 16 or to 17... hell i must do a dozen cars a day that go from 14 to 17 at the shop
It's not the height, it's the width. Most 16x8's had 245 tires where as 15x7's had like 215 or something like that. Most people who have issues with rubbing had 15's originally because of the different steering stops.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 01:10 AM
  #18  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Is your car lowered at all?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #19  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
steering stops? the cars are all the same thing unless you got a different suspension package(ws6,iroc) which were different springs and sway bars. but putting stock 16s on a car with 15s isnt going to do anything. my car had the lousy 14inch steel wheels. now i have 15x8 all around with a 295 in the back and a 235 in the front. i have no complaints

i dont understand what your trying to say
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 07:25 AM
  #20  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
Originally posted by 25THRSS
It's not the height, it's the width. Most 16x8's had 245 tires where as 15x7's had like 215 or something like that. Most people who have issues with rubbing had 15's originally because of the different steering stops.
all the 16s had 245's. and i dont know if you were asking me but no my car is not lowered. its actually lifted in the back
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 07:45 PM
  #21  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by Kontrax
all the 16s had 245's. and i dont know if you were asking me but no my car is not lowered. its actually lifted in the back
no they didnt. My 92 RS came from the factory with 235/55/16's.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 07:47 PM
  #22  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by Kontrax
steering stops? the cars are all the same thing unless you got a different suspension package(ws6,iroc) which were different springs and sway bars. but putting stock 16s on a car with 15s isnt going to do anything. my car had the lousy 14inch steel wheels. now i have 15x8 all around with a 295 in the back and a 235 in the front. i have no complaints

i dont understand what your trying to say
OK, let me try to explain this to you. Cars with 15x7 inch wheels or smaller had stops that would enable them to turn the wheel more giving a better turning radius. Cars with 16x8 inch wheels had different stops that wouldn't let them turn the wheel as much so that the tires wouldn't rub. Understand?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 11:23 PM
  #23  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
Originally posted by 25THRSS
no they didnt. My 92 RS came from the factory with 235/55/16's.
you got screwed
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 11:27 PM
  #24  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
Originally posted by 25THRSS
OK, let me try to explain this to you. Cars with 15x7 inch wheels or smaller had stops that would enable them to turn the wheel more giving a better turning radius. Cars with 16x8 inch wheels had different stops that wouldn't let them turn the wheel as much so that the tires wouldn't rub. Understand?
no i dont understand. stops in what? the steering box? ive owned 6 thirdgens and have no idea what kind of "stops" your talking about. hope your not talking about the front end because they utilize the same paralella steering setup
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 12:21 AM
  #25  
88Camaro350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
My car isn't technically lowered BUT 16 year old front springs and worn out bushings do wonders for lowering lol. It isn't that low but I do have a set of dropzone lowering springs coming....

also rebuilding the front suspension with all new Federal Mogul TRW parts, poly bushings, new struts again.

Hopefully with all new TRW parts, colemanracing solid tie-rod sleeves, new GR2 struts, poly bushings, wonder bar, and the new springs it will handle alot better.

As for the kuhmo tires I have no opinion on them. Lots of people like them. I liked my dunlops I had....


What do you suggest for street tires?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 08:42 AM
  #26  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
its up to you waht you want for tires. some tires handle better then others, and some ride better then others. i stay away from kumho, hankook and falken. they are all CHEAP rubber with fancy disigns. michelin makes excellent tires if your willing to pay for them. goodyear makes nice riding tires but they tend to wear fast and i see a lot get bubbles on them. yokohamma makes a nice tire also. i try to stay away from most BF tires, and all their decent ones are over priced IMO

youll notice a big difference when you replace the springs and struts/shocks togeather. its like driving a whole new car
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 10:02 AM
  #27  
Orinackra's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 06 SRM M6 GTO, 98 Grand Prix GTP
Originally posted by Kontrax
no i dont understand. stops in what? the steering box? ive owned 6 thirdgens and have no idea what kind of "stops" your talking about. hope your not talking about the front end because they utilize the same paralella steering setup
No they're on the control arms. They're metal tabs that stick out that stop your wheel from turning too much. This is the same problem I have going from 15 to 16 inch wheels.

If you call up a yard or something for control arms...trust me..they'll ask you if its for a car with 15 or 16's. Cause the stops are different.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 11:15 AM
  #28  
gen3z's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: las vegas
Car: '92 droptop bird
Engine: 5.7L,mild cam etc.
Transmission: modded 700r4 w/2600
considering that 245/50/16 is the factory size tire with a 16"f-body i would say your suspension is sagging too much,i have had 255s on a formula 350,as well as an RS without interference both cars were less than 4yrs. old at the time
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 12:05 PM
  #29  
88Camaro350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
My suspension is worn out. But its getting an overhaul soon. Even with the dropzone springs (1.75'' front drop and 1.5'' rear) I really doubt I'll see much ride height difference.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 02:05 PM
  #30  
Orinackra's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,374
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 06 SRM M6 GTO, 98 Grand Prix GTP
I have a feeling its still gonna rub with the new suspension when you turn it lock to lock. Its not a big deal, just dont turn it all the way till it hits.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 05:28 PM
  #31  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by Kontrax
you got screwed
I didn't get screwed nor did any other 91-92 RS or non g92 z28 camaros with the f41 suspension package. 235/55/16 was the tire size for all non g92 camaros equipped with 16x8 inch tires in 91-92. You simply just don't know your info. The post about the control arms is correct.

Last edited by 25THRSS; Mar 22, 2004 at 05:31 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 07:33 PM
  #32  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
yeah the 235 in the 16s comes on the v6 body styles on 4thgen. maybe its because you so late in years. i do know my info... find me an 80's car with the 235. are they goodyears?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 08:39 PM
  #33  
Gladstoneiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 1
From: Gladstone, Missouri
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI (ebl inside)
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 lsd 10 bolt
Originally posted by Kontrax
find me an 80's car with the 235. are they goodyears?
Does 91-92 count? Cause 25THRS is right, he did specifically say 91-92. But you are right on the V6 16" forth gen tires.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 08:52 PM
  #34  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
its because of the crossover years. iv NEVER seen an 80s fbody with that size. like i said, ive owned 6 of these damn things. i also work in a shop and we change MANY tires so dont tell me i dont know my "info" because i know a lot

as for the stop tabs, why dont the aftermarket A arms have these? i havent seen any on the aftermarket tubular types. just go to a junker and get some off a 16 inch car if your that concerned with it. gives you an excuse to brush em down and paint em up real pretty
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 11:17 PM
  #35  
84 1LE's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,644
Likes: 403
From: Oyth
Car: 89RS vert
Engine: Erod
Transmission: 4L65e
Axle/Gears: BW, 3.27
F-bodys w/16 vs 15in wheels did have larger stops,but the stops are in the steering box.Also on my 84 which now has 16in gta wheels.Ive always noticed that they rub more when Im (backing out)than when Im going forward.In general though I think all f-bodys have this "problem".
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 07:48 AM
  #36  
88Camaro350's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
From: B'ville, WV
Car: 2002 Formula Firebird
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4l60e
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Mine rub pretty bad going forward. I can leave with it. Long as I don't cut it real bad it should be ok.

My 245's did this also. But not as bad.

I am getting a set of 245/45/16 kuhmo 711's for the IROC wheels I bought. (winter rims). I doubt those will rub as bad
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 05:13 PM
  #37  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
again, i have never noticed "steering stops" on the A arms and ive been under a million of these cars. maybe i wasnt paying attention? no idea. ive also never had a rubbing problem with tires or wheels. i suggest if your tires are rubbing, you get smaller ones. it is very dangerious when a tire rubs. can cause a blow out. i would check constantly for bald spots or belts coming through
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 05:42 PM
  #38  
84 1LE's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,644
Likes: 403
From: Oyth
Car: 89RS vert
Engine: Erod
Transmission: 4L65e
Axle/Gears: BW, 3.27
Originally posted by Kontrax
again, i have never noticed "steering stops" on the A arms and ive been under a million of these cars. maybe i wasnt paying attention? no idea. ive also never had a rubbing problem with tires or wheels. i suggest if your tires are rubbing, you get smaller ones. it is very dangerious when a tire rubs. can cause a blow out. i would check constantly for bald spots or belts coming through
These stops are the rearward part of the A-arm.It keeps the steering knuckle from hitting the arm.The steering box also has internal stops.They are thicker on the f-bodys that came w/16in wheels vs the 15in.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 07:01 PM
  #39  
Kontrax's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 828
Likes: 1
From: Moving to non emission state
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: L98 350 bore .060 out, Carb power
Transmission: slusher 700 beatbox
ill take a look.

the steering box raises another question, what happens when you swap the s10 manual box in then? i see a lot of people swapping the manual boxes in (mostly from s10s) ill have to read up on this. i can understand about the A arms but the steering box questions me
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 07:08 PM
  #40  
25THRSS's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,740
Likes: 3
From: Glen Allen, VA
Originally posted by Kontrax
ill take a look.

the steering box raises another question, what happens when you swap the s10 manual box in then? i see a lot of people swapping the manual boxes in (mostly from s10s) ill have to read up on this. i can understand about the A arms but the steering box questions me
Most people who do that are mostly conserned with drag racing therefor skinny front tires are what's going to be on the car. I'm not 100% sure, but I'de bet if you put fat tires up front they'de rub pretty bad.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 07:27 PM
  #41  
84 1LE's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,644
Likes: 403
From: Oyth
Car: 89RS vert
Engine: Erod
Transmission: 4L65e
Axle/Gears: BW, 3.27
Originally posted by Kontrax
ill take a look.

the steering box raises another question, what happens when you swap the s10 manual box in then? i see a lot of people swapping the manual boxes in (mostly from s10s) ill have to read up on this. i can understand about the A arms but the steering box questions me
It depends on how many turns the s-10 has from lock to lock.Basically the skinner the front wheels are from the factory & how much room there is in the wheel well.The thinner the stops are.This is from a car craft issue(feb 92,too big to post) courtesy of Lee Power steering.I also got the same info from AGR when i spoke to them & bought one of their steering boxes.

Last edited by 84 1LE; Mar 23, 2004 at 07:32 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
ZMWojnar
Brakes
5
May 12, 2019 10:43 PM
Orr89RocZ
Power Adders
200
Feb 13, 2016 10:04 PM
87iroctheo
Wheels and Tires
5
Aug 29, 2015 09:44 PM
Wylecoyote08
Body
7
Aug 22, 2015 01:58 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.