Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

bmr lca width vs stock?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2009, 08:43 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
bmxerboi221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
bmr lca width vs stock?

I got my c6 wheels on the bird but when i take sharp turns the rear tires rub on the control arms. My car is about lowered1.5''-2'' abd im waiting on my adjustable panhard to come in the mail. Also i dont have lcarb yet but they are coming soon. So are there any aftermarket control arms that are smaller/skinnier that will allow a little more clearence? Also for some reason the passenger side rear has always sat about an inch higher than the driver side????? Ive had the lowering springs in over a year and have messed with them a few times but could never get it fixed. thanks in advance guys!!!
Old 07-04-2009, 10:41 AM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,651
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

most aftermarket rear lower control arms are smaller in diameter than stock, BMR's website will tell you what they are made out of. depending on style, they range from 1.25": wide to 1.625 wide. Both a bit narrower than stock.

Are you rubbing on both arms of just one? it probably has a lot to do with the lack of an adjustable panhard than just the control arms.

as for the rear height, are the spring insulators both in place and are both the springs indexed properly? the open end of the spring should be to the rear of the axle mount pad.
Old 07-04-2009, 06:09 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
bmxerboi221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

Yeah im pretty sure its rubbing on both sides. Another thing when i take the turn my car does lean because i have small sway bars. I think once i get bigger sway bars it wont hit but theres only one way to find out haha
Old 07-04-2009, 07:25 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,651
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

are you sure you are running on the lca?

what you need to do before you start throwing money at parts, is pull both wheels off and see if
1. both are rubbing
2. where they really are rubbing.

then you can intelligently pick a solution.
I just cant imagine that you are rubbing on both LCA's. Its most likely only one side rubbing because of an off-center rear.
Old 07-04-2009, 07:39 PM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

Bad bushings on the PHB, would allow the rear end to **** left & right & rub both wheels.

But ....Have you identified FOR SURE where the rubbing is?

A sway bar doesn't nothing to limit left/right travel & prevent rubbing. Only way the sway bar could affect the rubbing, is of the tires are rubbing the inner fender well, when the body leans in turns.
Old 07-04-2009, 07:59 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
bmxerboi221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

Well I know for sure its rubbing on one side cause there is rubber dust on the driver lca but I do need to checkk the other Side. But It is rubbing somewhere on both sides
Old 07-04-2009, 08:13 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

My UMI LCA........2 5/8" vs 1 1/8"

Yeah....Tubulars will give you a good bit of room. If you need even more, get the offset bushing spacers, if you get rod-ended LCAs.
Attached Thumbnails bmr lca width vs stock?-p7040053.jpg  
Old 07-04-2009, 08:26 PM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
bmxerboi221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

Originally Posted by Stephen
My UMI LCA........2 5/8" vs 1 1/8"

Yeah....Tubulars will give you a good bit of room. If you need even more, get the offset bushing spacers, if you get rod-ended LCAs.
Awesome Stephen, thanks for that picture! If after the panhard i still have problems those will deffinitely give me a lot of room
Old 07-04-2009, 11:22 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (12)
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Bertram (outside Austin), TX
Posts: 12,212
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 87 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Dana M78 3.27 posi
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

Equal On-Car adjustables.....

BMR.....1.25" x .095" 4130 chrome moly tubing.

UMI......1.250" x 0.095" 4130 Chrome Moly steel

So if you get the adjustables too, the BMR ones will be the same as my UMI ones.
Old 07-05-2009, 02:12 PM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 12,651
Likes: 0
Received 46 Likes on 44 Posts
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, T5
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, 3:23 torsion
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

so im curious, what wheel are you using? backspacing and spacer? I've seen people here with 17x11's with stock control arms, only a little rubbing.
Old 07-05-2009, 04:12 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
UMI Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Philipsburg, Pa
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

Hello,

Thanks for the interest in UMI

You may also want to consider these- http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...roducts_id=107

They offset the control arm inward an additional 3/8"... should do the trick for you as well

Also as noted a panhard bar to make sure the rear end is good and center is a good idea. Also if the factory bar or bushings allows the stock panhard bar to flex at all that will cause your issues as well. I would highly a panhard bar, we have a full list seen here- and we have 15% off right now! - http://www.umiperformance.com/catalo...Path=7_138_106

Thank you!
Ryan
Old 07-05-2009, 05:48 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
bmxerboi221's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Firebird
Engine: soon to be 3.4/3400
Re: bmr lca width vs stock?

Well I think the rears are 19 by 10.5. And I'm running 295/30 still waiting on the panhard I'm getting from a member from here maybe he will include new bushings
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Genopsyde
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
10-07-2015 08:35 PM
lt1z350
Suspension and Chassis
5
08-28-2015 05:57 AM
TheExaminer
Suspension and Chassis
21
08-25-2015 07:34 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
08-05-2015 07:57 PM



Quick Reply: bmr lca width vs stock?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.