Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2012, 09:30 AM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Hey guys,

I picked up a set of the hotchkiss lowering springs for my car which dropped the car, I'd say 1.5-2" all around. I LOVE how the car now sits but as I've read more, I feel like I also need to get a new adjustable panhard bar, lower control arm relocation brackets, an adjustable torque arm and new rear lower control arms.

My question is, in order of precedence, which should I get first and why? For a street car, is it really necessary and what, if any damage will I cause long term by not getting them? Any advice is appreciated!
Old 11-07-2012, 10:25 AM
  #2  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Idk about "necessary", but the precedent to my understanding goes like this
:Lower control arms and relocation brackets
Wonder bar if not already had
Shocks then struts
Panhard bar
Poly end links to your sway bars is a good idea as well
Old 11-07-2012, 11:26 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Ozz1967
Hey guys,

I picked up a set of the hotchkiss lowering springs for my car which dropped the car, I'd say 1.5-2" all around. I LOVE how the car now sits but as I've read more, I feel like I also need to get a new adjustable panhard bar, lower control arm relocation brackets, an adjustable torque arm and new rear lower control arms.

My question is, in order of precedence, which should I get first and why? For a street car, is it really necessary and what, if any damage will I cause long term by not getting them? Any advice is appreciated!
Struts, shocks, and an alignment (if you haven't done all that already).

Poly sway bar bushings and end links - unless you already did them.

Weld in subframe connectors.

Panhard rod, rear control arms, TQ arm, CA brackets.

Strut tower brace.
Old 11-07-2012, 12:14 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by paul_huryk
Struts, shocks, and an alignment (if you haven't done all that already).

Poly sway bar bushings and end links - unless you already did them.

Weld in subframe connectors.

Panhard rod, rear control arms, TQ arm, CA brackets.

Strut tower brace.
I guess I should have mentioned other mods. These mods have already been done...

Hotchkiss front and rear sway bar
Wonder bar
Hotchkiss lowering springs (already mentioned)
poly bushings all around
Spohn Subframe conectors

I'm currently running a set of Monro Sensa-trac struts/shocks, but I've been looking at Koni's. However, I don't know if I should get the adjustable ones or not. Is there a need/requirement for adjustable? the front left strut has begun leaking, so I'll be replacing them, but...probably going to have to limp it to tax return season. I have had the alignment done already and the springs are in the car already also as well as the items mentioned earlier.

This car is carbed, so I don't know which strut brace to get, none that I've seen would seem to fit it.
Old 11-14-2012, 02:12 PM
  #5  
Former Sponsor
 
BMR Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Lowering your car that much means that a panhard bar is necessary as well as shocks. You can get by without them, but your rearend alignment will be off, and your shocks will probably wear out at an accelerated rate. Because of that, I consider the them a requirement.

Lower control arms and relocation brackets are not required. If you end up having traction or wheel hop problems as a result of lowering, then you'll need LCAs w/Relocation Brackets.

Anything else is just an optional performance benefit.
Old 11-14-2012, 03:11 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by BMR Tech
Lowering your car that much means that a panhard bar is necessary as well as shocks. You can get by without them, but your rearend alignment will be off, and your shocks will probably wear out at an accelerated rate. Because of that, I consider the them a requirement.

Lower control arms and relocation brackets are not required. If you end up having traction or wheel hop problems as a result of lowering, then you'll need LCAs w/Relocation Brackets.

Anything else is just an optional performance benefit.

Should I look into a solid or adjustable panhard bar?

How about a torque arm?
Old 11-14-2012, 03:35 PM
  #7  
Member
 
makingPAIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Scorched Earth, AZ
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 firebird
Engine: 350 .40 over
Transmission: 5 speed borg(NWC), ram clutch
Axle/Gears: ROTATING MERCURY DRIVE.
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Ozz1967
Should I look into a solid or adjustable panhard bar?

How about a torque arm?
I lowered my third gen firebird that much and i picked up a umi off car adjustable pan hard and i have my rear end within a 1/16 of an inch. u need one just like he said the rest is just optional good luck man
Old 11-14-2012, 03:41 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by makingPAIN
I lowered my third gen firebird that much and i picked up a umi off car adjustable pan hard and i have my rear end within a 1/16 of an inch. u need one just like he said the rest is just optional good luck man
Thanks man, I appreciate it. 17 years has gone by really fast!

Are adjusting the pan hard bar's easy? How do I know when it'll be centered/correct?
Old 11-14-2012, 03:56 PM
  #9  
Member
 
makingPAIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Scorched Earth, AZ
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1985 firebird
Engine: 350 .40 over
Transmission: 5 speed borg(NWC), ram clutch
Axle/Gears: ROTATING MERCURY DRIVE.
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

yeah they are not bad i centered my wheels with my fender wells. and did a line from my tranny back just to make sure . the off car ones are a little more tough but worth the less money
Old 11-14-2012, 05:25 PM
  #10  
Member
 
LivinLarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

With your upgrades get the Koni's then get an adjustable panhard bar
Old 11-15-2012, 05:11 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by LivinLarge
With your upgrades get the Koni's then get an adjustable panhard bar
Adjustable or standard replacement syle Koni's? Also, on if I get the adjustable, how do I know where to set them? Is there a guide or recommended setting?
Old 11-15-2012, 03:54 PM
  #12  
Member
 
LivinLarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

With the adjustables, you can set the stiffness you want to ride. Either way will make a huge difference.
Old 11-15-2012, 04:01 PM
  #13  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Soit's not adjusting the ride height as much as it's adjusing the ride firmness?
Old 11-15-2012, 05:00 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Confuzed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Just my experience with lowering:

I don't know about adjustable shocks, or if you really need them. I didn't, but I'd guess the adjustability is neat.

Just put a decent quality shock (Like Koni's, Bilsteins or the like) - on the car, and get rid of those sensi-tracs!!

I already had a non-adjustable UMI TQ arm, Spohn LCARBS (which I also didn't absolutley need) - and I still have my stock panhard rod. I plan to get an aftermarket panhard rod soon though....but the rear didn't go out of alignment when I lowered my car - but I've heard others that said thiers did. I just want an aftermarket panhard because the stock POS is flimsy, so I could use something stronger with this 9" Moser rear since it's heavier.

If you get some of the good aftermarket CC plates (JM, UMI etc), they sit about 1" higher than stock, so your strut travel is barely affected any when you use those w/lowering springs.

As mentioned, you'll need a realignment...BTW, the aftermarket CC plates wil also give you more adjustability for that too...so those are a "win - win" IMO..

My car came right into alignment with no change in pinion angle or rear alignment.....maybe I got lucky.

With reduced ground clearance, you'll want the ride stiffer anyway so you won't bottom out...that's why decent struts and shocks are important when lowering IMO...

EDIT: There's pics of all the crap I have on the car in the link below, and I have a thread out there when I lowered my car out there somewhere...

Last edited by Confuzed1; 11-15-2012 at 05:04 PM.
Old 11-15-2012, 06:46 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Reid Fleming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: SuperRam 350
Transmission: Pro Built S/S TH700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Ozz1967
Adjustable or standard replacement syle Koni's? Also, on if I get the adjustable, how do I know where to set them? Is there a guide or recommended setting?
For our cars, we have a few different choices for Koni.

1) Red
2) Yellow (higher performance)....Get the yellow. End of story. Just get the yellow.

1) Single Adjustable (SA).....Get the single adjustable.
2) Dual Adjustable (DA)

For the front struts, this is easy. You get the yellows, which comes with a variable adjustment **** that you can turn to increase or decrease the amount of "rebound" on the car. Start with it in the fully soft position for a few weeks and then try turning it up a bit. Set it where you like it. For me, this is about 1/2 turn from full soft. Sometimes if I want to go have fun with the car, I'll turn it up to 1 full turn. Sometimes I'll set it on full soft. Just depends on mood.


For the rear shocks, you have two choices.
1) 3rd gen shocks. (1982-92) These have 4 different settings (0, 1, 2, 3 clicks).
2) 4th gen shocks. (1993-02) These have a variable **** like the front of the car.

The 4th gen shocks are about a $100 more expensive. But I wound up going with the 3rd gen shocks instead. The rear of the car doesn't seem to need the fine tuning that the front does. I set my (3rd gen) rear shocks in the full soft (0 click) setting and have had it there for almost 2 years now.

If you're wondering why I don't recommend DA struts/shocks, it's because they offer both compression and rebound adjustment instead of rebound only adjustment like the SA do.......Compression adjustment is more for people who have added/subtracted a lot of weight to the car. It's also harder to mess up the settings when you only have the single adjustment.

In terms of click adjustment. The 3rd gen rears are as such:
0 clicks = full soft (what I use)
1 clicks = 20% increase in rebound
2 clicks = 50% increase
3 clicks = 100% increase
Old 11-15-2012, 09:52 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
pasuperdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Middletown, PA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/3.73
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

My opinion, and speaking from a bad experience.
Get yourself an adjustable torque arm first. Your pinion bearing and u-joints will thank you.
Second would be the adjustable panhard bar. If you look at the back of the car, you will see that the rear has shifted.
Old 11-16-2012, 09:26 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Confuzed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

After reading your first post...you lowered it already, and now you're asking if you need an adjustable panhard bar and TQ arm? Get a magnetic angle finder and see if you need the TQ arm. Also take side-to-side measurements on the rear end to see if you need the panhard.

-In any case, I'd get decent shocks.

Last edited by Confuzed1; 11-16-2012 at 09:45 AM.
Old 11-16-2012, 12:06 PM
  #18  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Ozz1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN
Posts: 4,780
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: LS1383 in work
Transmission: Magnum F
Axle/Gears: Zexel Torsen 3.73, 28-spline mosers
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Confuzed1
After reading your first post...you lowered it already, and now you're asking if you need an adjustable panhard bar and TQ arm? Get a magnetic angle finder and see if you need the TQ arm. Also take side-to-side measurements on the rear end to see if you need the panhard.

-In any case, I'd get decent shocks.
I lowered the car years ago before I knew anything about pinion angles or adjustable pan hard bars. Now I'm just wondering if I need all these fancy upgrades or if my stock set up will still suffice. I'd rather spend money on a new paint job and some interior work but, if I need to upgrade because I missed something when I originally lowered the car, then I'll do it.
Old 11-16-2012, 12:30 PM
  #19  
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Podium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Ozz1967
Should I look into a solid or adjustable panhard bar?
You will need to get an adjustable to center the rear after lowering it.
Old 11-16-2012, 01:37 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Confuzed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Ozz1967
I lowered the car years ago before I knew anything about pinion angles or adjustable pan hard bars. Now I'm just wondering if I need all these fancy upgrades or if my stock set up will still suffice. I'd rather spend money on a new paint job and some interior work but, if I need to upgrade because I missed something when I originally lowered the car, then I'll do it.
You'll only "need" the adjustable torque arm if your pinion angle is way off. You'll only "need" the adjustable panhard bar if the rear isn't centered.
Niether one of those things are fancy if they are both off....you'll need the adjustability they provide.

Are you having issues with the car not tracking correctly down the road? Tires wearing out prematurely? -I'll assume you got the front end aligned since it's been lowered for a while. Are you wearing out U-joints or weird vibration?

I guess I'm just wondering why you would ask this question if the car was lowered years ago, unless you're having issues since then - or never drive the car.

Pinion angle and side-to-side alignment of the rear can be checked easiliy enough. If they both check out OK, and you don't show any of the above symptoms, then you're most likely just fine with the setup you have.
Old 11-16-2012, 01:59 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member
 
built91Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Orlando
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 357, Canfield heads, solid roller,
Transmission: Upgraded 03 Cobra T56
Axle/Gears: 9" 3.50 gears and Detroit Locker
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

The panhard bar is required to center the axle. If you lower the car, the rear axle is not centered. Every car, every time. The factory bar is a certain length to make the axle centered at a certain ride height. If you change this ride height, the axle is no longer centered. It wont be off by several inches or anything, but it will be off by some.
Old 11-17-2012, 09:47 AM
  #22  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Confuzed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by built91Z28
The panhard bar is required to center the axle. If you lower the car, the rear axle is not centered. Every car, every time. The factory bar is a certain length to make the axle centered at a certain ride height. If you change this ride height, the axle is no longer centered. It wont be off by several inches or anything, but it will be off by some.
"Off by some" being the main statement to take out of what built91Z28 is saying. It's simple geometry by the design of the rear pan hard, that it will change "some".

The bar indeed does center the car at a certain ride height...assuming the car stays at that exact ride height, it will stay perfectly centered. It's also designed so that the rear does not go too far from centered when the suspension is loaded, like when you go over dips in the road, bumps and the like. There's these two other things that's considered too. Most of our cars have a back seat and a trunk.

When people sit in the back seat, the ride height can lower 1" or more...or when some install that big sub box and amp in the trunk, etc...

I've yet to see any Camaro or Firebird track sideways down the road because there's people in the back seat, or they have tools in the trunk. That also leads me to believe that any shift to either side is very minimal when the suspension is loaded, and how much it shifts - no matter how drastically little - is highly dependent on how much lowered it is from the original ride height.

I'm no suspension expert by any means...if I'm setting a car up for road racing or any type of driving that deviates from normal, having the rear perfectly centered at all times might be much more critical and a adjustable bar might be required for better handling....and honestly the stock rear F body suspension wouldn't be my first choice for that type of driving anyway...I'd go with IRS for that. So you can either buy the bar, then measure...or vise versa. I know which is cheaper to do.

I'm not saying built91Z28 is wrong at all...you might need one. I didn't when I used Eibach Sportlines on mine....but the drop was only 1.0" in the rear. That MIGHT have shifted the rear 1/16th of an inch if even that much. If you're slamming it more than that, the change might be a bit more and you'll need to adjust.
Old 11-17-2012, 10:59 AM
  #23  
Junior Member
 
pasuperdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Middletown, PA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/3.73
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Confuzed1
"Off by some" being the main statement to take out of what built91Z28 is saying. It's simple geometry by the design of the rear pan hard, that it will change "some".

The bar indeed does center the car at a certain ride height...assuming the car stays at that exact ride height, it will stay perfectly centered. It's also designed so that the rear does not go too far from centered when the suspension is loaded, like when you go over dips in the road, bumps and the like. There's these two other things that's considered too. Most of our cars have a back seat and a trunk.

When people sit in the back seat, the ride height can lower 1" or more...or when some install that big sub box and amp in the trunk, etc...

I've yet to see any Camaro or Firebird track sideways down the road because there's people in the back seat, or they have tools in the trunk. That also leads me to believe that any shift to either side is very minimal when the suspension is loaded, and how much it shifts - no matter how drastically little - is highly dependent on how much lowered it is from the original ride height.

I'm no suspension expert by any means...if I'm setting a car up for road racing or any type of driving that deviates from normal, having the rear perfectly centered at all times might be much more critical and a adjustable bar might be required for better handling....and honestly the stock rear F body suspension wouldn't be my first choice for that type of driving anyway...I'd go with IRS for that. So you can either buy the bar, then measure...or vise versa. I know which is cheaper to do.

I'm not saying built91Z28 is wrong at all...you might need one. I didn't when I used Eibach Sportlines on mine....but the drop was only 1.0" in the rear. That MIGHT have shifted the rear 1/16th of an inch if even that much. If you're slamming it more than that, the change might be a bit more and you'll need to adjust.
I was speaking by the experience I had in my earlier post. I'm far from being an expert either. When changing your ride height, you change more than just the height. The angle of the pinion changes, thus changing the angles your ujoints must operate. The change in mine was significant enough to tear up my pinion bearing and seal. I researched and found I indeed needed a adjustable torque arm to bring the spec back in to tolerance. The adjustable panhard bar is also a must. Besides just the appearance of having the rear not centered, you would think there was more to it. If the rear is not centered, how does that affect the spring mountings? How about the lower control arms and bushings that are now trying to operate at a different angle? What about the new angle the shocks operate at? The rear is centered because of more than just appearance. In my case the rear was shifted a little more than 1/2". If I had it to do all over again, I would have researched this site and others as a tool to know what I found out the hard way.
Old 11-17-2012, 11:55 AM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Confuzed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: GO PACK GO
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

I'll stick to what I've been saying all along. The OP's car is already lowered guys.

To the OP: Take the pinion angle reading, and check you rear end side-to-side alignment and base your decisions on what your results are. It's as simple as that.

There's also a helpful post on "lowering 101" at the top of the suspension board here.
Old 11-17-2012, 03:49 PM
  #25  
Junior Member
 
pasuperdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Middletown, PA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt w/3.73
Re: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?

Originally Posted by Confuzed1
I'll stick to what I've been saying all along. The OP's car is already lowered guys.

To the OP: Take the pinion angle reading, and check you rear end side-to-side alignment and base your decisions on what your results are. It's as simple as that.

There's also a helpful post on "lowering 101" at the top of the suspension board here.
I agree that was easy....lol
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Azrael91966669
DIY PROM
25
06-20-2017 04:04 AM
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
12-21-2015 10:36 PM
IroczFan
Suspension and Chassis
11
10-06-2015 10:13 AM
camaro71633
Tech / General Engine
39
09-01-2015 10:24 AM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
08-09-2015 08:13 PM



Quick Reply: Need Opinion on lowered car suspension upgrades -- what to get?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 AM.