roler cam questons
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 699
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
roler cam questons
I'm thinking of converting to a roller cam, (when I get some money) and I have some questons. I need a cam close to my current cam (comp cam's 280H (230* @.05 lift .494 total lift- the old grinde- you know the one from the early to mid 80's)) so I dont have to get a new chip for my computer, and I need to know what the advantages/disadvanatges of hydrolic roler and solid roler lifters and some Ideas on wich brands are better then others
Roller cams are good for several reasons...less friction at the lifter surface, ability to run steeper lobe ramps are the two biggies that come to mind.
Solid lifter cams, roller or otherwise, require frequent maintenance in the form of valve lash adjustment. The upside is they resist valve float...lower mass in the lifter, no chance of lifter pump-up as there are no hydraulics.
Hydraulic roller cams are a good compromise. You get the steeper lobe ramp capability (valve gets to max lift faster) but the same low maintenance of a hydraulic cam.
Just some info to help you decide, only you can determine which is right for your case and what you want to do w/ the car.
Solid lifter cams, roller or otherwise, require frequent maintenance in the form of valve lash adjustment. The upside is they resist valve float...lower mass in the lifter, no chance of lifter pump-up as there are no hydraulics.
Hydraulic roller cams are a good compromise. You get the steeper lobe ramp capability (valve gets to max lift faster) but the same low maintenance of a hydraulic cam.
Just some info to help you decide, only you can determine which is right for your case and what you want to do w/ the car.
I'd have a tendency to say that Comp Cams make the best camshafts because of their quality control and machining tendencys and tolerances. It's just my opinion but they make the best camshafts.
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 699
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
any suggestons on peticular parts, detirmaning factors are cost power increace and compatiballty with my current computer(even though if I wait til I get a supercharger I can put a real lumpy cam 'cause I'll need to cange chips anyways)
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
From: College Station, Tex USA
Car: 89rs
Engine: 400Sb
Transmission: Tremec 3550
if your using FI a "lumpy" cam is much more difficult
it involves changing the overlap and LSA and that could prevent the motor from going closed loop regardless of chip used.
There's yet another angle on kevinc's debate on hyd vs solid
And this is rev kits for hydraulic roller cams
They can be good for another 500 rpms, maybe more
So now you can push the limits of a hydraulic roller (6000rpms) to maybe 6500-7000
Although when it comes down to it if you want those R's, just go solid.
And this is rev kits for hydraulic roller cams
They can be good for another 500 rpms, maybe more
So now you can push the limits of a hydraulic roller (6000rpms) to maybe 6500-7000
Although when it comes down to it if you want those R's, just go solid.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Senior Member

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 699
Likes: 1
From: Houston TX
Car: 84 Z-28 Camaro, 2022 2500 silverado
Engine: 383
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: richmond 3.73, eaton posi
If I use solid, will I have to ajust them all the time - I mean there would be hardly any ware 'cause of the roller right? (by the way I'm going to have to wait about 3 or 4 months befor I have enough money to get the parts plus I'm trying to decide if I should get roller lifters, a supercharger or a paint job)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





