0-60 and 1/4 mile
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
I'll just give you some rough figures to go by until someone else can chime in some "real world" numbers.
I'd guess it'd probably take somewhere between eight to nine seconds 0-60 and a mid-16 quarter mile, depening on how good of condition and tune the engine is in.
I'd guess it'd probably take somewhere between eight to nine seconds 0-60 and a mid-16 quarter mile, depening on how good of condition and tune the engine is in.
Supreme Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by megaracerx
really really slow.
really really slow.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Yeah, slow, well the reason I got an LG4 was because of the lack of computer control. That way I can work on it easier, dont have to worry about FI setups going weird like on my v6, and I can drop in a 350 REAL easy. So it suits my needs.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 2
From: SE Michigan
Car: Bright Red 91 GTA
Engine: CARBED LT4
Transmission: MK6
and G92 L98 would hit 60 in just under 6 seconds..5.8 or so and run low 14's...a non G92 L98 would hit 60 in a little over 6 seconds and run mid 14's..
a G92 LB9 would 60 in about the same time and run a similar 1/4 mile (when you know how to drive noone of that grannyshifting nonsense)
a 5 speed Lg4 would 60 in 7.0-7-5 seconds and 1/4 in low 16's
so an auto would be 2-3 tentsh slower
a G92 LB9 would 60 in about the same time and run a similar 1/4 mile (when you know how to drive noone of that grannyshifting nonsense)
a 5 speed Lg4 would 60 in 7.0-7-5 seconds and 1/4 in low 16's
so an auto would be 2-3 tentsh slower
Trending Topics
TGO Supporter

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by megaracerx
the reason i bought an LG4 was because i wanted a v-8...and didnt know much about thirdgens back then...its a good lil engine though..besides a 350/5spd combo will be droped soon
the reason i bought an LG4 was because i wanted a v-8...and didnt know much about thirdgens back then...its a good lil engine though..besides a 350/5spd combo will be droped soon
Originally posted by nick418
i cant wait to see this.. What kinda 350? Tuned Port?
i cant wait to see this.. What kinda 350? Tuned Port?
was that sarcasm i detect?
i have no idea yet, just and idea of whta i want...besides..the first major project i delv into will be a 4th gen interior
Last edited by megaracerx; Nov 12, 2004 at 08:56 PM.
I dont see why people dislike tuned ports so much. Nice torque curve, an ok aftermarket, I can almost start the car just by bumping the starter. (No real aftermarket igntion stuff either.)
Although, the best ones I have heard is people switching from a Roller cam to a Flat tappet "for performance."
Although, the best ones I have heard is people switching from a Roller cam to a Flat tappet "for performance."
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by 305q_ta86
Yeah, slow, well the reason I got an LG4 was because of the lack of computer control. That way I can work on it easier, dont have to worry about FI setups going weird like on my v6, and I can drop in a 350 REAL easy. So it suits my needs.
Yeah, slow, well the reason I got an LG4 was because of the lack of computer control. That way I can work on it easier, dont have to worry about FI setups going weird like on my v6, and I can drop in a 350 REAL easy. So it suits my needs.
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: Calgary, AB
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
Originally posted by 1989t-topGTA
Not on the Canadian cars. They are ECM-free.
Not on the Canadian cars. They are ECM-free.
TGO Supporter

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by megaracerx
was that sarcasm i detect?
i have no idea yet, just and idea of whta i want...besides..the first major project i delv into will be a 4th gen interior
was that sarcasm i detect?
i have no idea yet, just and idea of whta i want...besides..the first major project i delv into will be a 4th gen interior
I was jw what kind of 350 thats all, i would love to hav a 350 5 speed myself
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Appleton
Car: 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.7 (350) TPI
Transmission: soon to be 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt rear. gears? hell if i know
soon I will have my 350 5 speed. (crosses fingers)
And this winter hopefully it will be a Stealth Rammed 350 5 speed
:rockon:
And this winter hopefully it will be a Stealth Rammed 350 5 speed
:rockon: Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
My car with the cam and exhaust went 16.45 @ 82mph
My friends LG4 with just exhaust and shiftkit went 16.55 @ 83mph
My drivetrain is mismatched so I have a good topend but I am in 1st gear til 50mph (about 6 seconds).
~Matt
My friends LG4 with just exhaust and shiftkit went 16.55 @ 83mph
My drivetrain is mismatched so I have a good topend but I am in 1st gear til 50mph (about 6 seconds).
~Matt
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
this one?
is a T56 with Blown Ls1. that thing will fly!!
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/92_formula_ls1
is a T56 with Blown Ls1. that thing will fly!!
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/92_formula_ls1
TGO Supporter

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
this one?
is a T56 with Blown Ls1. that thing will fly!!
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/92_formula_ls1
this one?
is a T56 with Blown Ls1. that thing will fly!!
http://www.hawksthirdgenparts.com/92_formula_ls1
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
From: Louisville, KY
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
Well, heres my numbers....
I took my bone stock LG4 with a 700R4 down to the local 1/8th mile track when I first got it. It had crumbliung plug wires, 4 differant types of plugs, Vac. Adv. not hooked up, rusted off exhaust, 700R4 not shifting right "slipping" before it would shift, and I ran 10.37...which translates to a upposed 16.1 pass......Since then I took out all the AC and Smog, long tube headers dumping into dual FlowTech Purple Hornies, Edelbrock Performer intake, Summit Racing cam, and Im putting the recently acquired Holley 4160 on right now. Tranny should be coming up in a few weeks. My 60ft times were insane though when I ran it first, like 2.5's....now they are 2.3's and even one 2.29
Im sure once I get my new carb on and a good tranny, Ill be deep into the 9's (1/8th) with this car, its got the potential and the motor is really tight, just Ive had bad luck with trannys and carbs ever since I bought my first car
The RS is the only one to not give me a trouble tranny....knock on wood.
I took my bone stock LG4 with a 700R4 down to the local 1/8th mile track when I first got it. It had crumbliung plug wires, 4 differant types of plugs, Vac. Adv. not hooked up, rusted off exhaust, 700R4 not shifting right "slipping" before it would shift, and I ran 10.37...which translates to a upposed 16.1 pass......Since then I took out all the AC and Smog, long tube headers dumping into dual FlowTech Purple Hornies, Edelbrock Performer intake, Summit Racing cam, and Im putting the recently acquired Holley 4160 on right now. Tranny should be coming up in a few weeks. My 60ft times were insane though when I ran it first, like 2.5's....now they are 2.3's and even one 2.29
The RS is the only one to not give me a trouble tranny....knock on wood. Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by anymethod
My car with the cam and exhaust went 16.45 @ 82mph
My friends LG4 with just exhaust and shiftkit went 16.55 @ 83mph
My drivetrain is mismatched so I have a good topend but I am in 1st gear til 50mph (about 6 seconds).
~Matt
My car with the cam and exhaust went 16.45 @ 82mph
My friends LG4 with just exhaust and shiftkit went 16.55 @ 83mph
My drivetrain is mismatched so I have a good topend but I am in 1st gear til 50mph (about 6 seconds).
~Matt
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Clearfield,Utah
Car: 1987 IROC, 1989 IROC
Engine: built 305, stock 305 tpi
Transmission: Corvette 700r4, t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi, 3.08 posi
hey TBI92Camaro let us know what kinda times your lg4 car runs when its up and going!
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
rx7speed:
My trans am's 60 ft was 2.41 and the 86 Iroc had I think like a 2.3 but i'm not sure on the Iroc. Never put in a cam without doing rear gears too. Theres no low end at all because the cam range is high and I have really low gears.
~Matt
My trans am's 60 ft was 2.41 and the 86 Iroc had I think like a 2.3 but i'm not sure on the Iroc. Never put in a cam without doing rear gears too. Theres no low end at all because the cam range is high and I have really low gears.
~Matt
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada. (West Coast)
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9 bolt posi (non 1le)
No to steal the topic here, but for you LG4 guys, any of these things come stock with a T5?
TGO Supporter

Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by Daishi
No to steal the topic here, but for you LG4 guys, any of these things come stock with a T5?
No to steal the topic here, but for you LG4 guys, any of these things come stock with a T5?
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: Appleton
Car: 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.7 (350) TPI
Transmission: soon to be 700r4
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt rear. gears? hell if i know
my 83 LG4 came with a T-5, now she is behind my immobile 350, I hope I get it back before it snows.
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 1
From: Milton Keynes, England
Car: 2009 Volvo V50 R Design
Engine: 2.0 turbo diesel
Transmission: 6 speed auto
Axle/Gears: yes, both
according to the G tec, my 86 LG4 (stock except folwmaster 80 series and edlebrock open element) ran 0 - 60 in 7.7 and 16.3 1/4
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 1
From: Milton Keynes, England
Car: 2009 Volvo V50 R Design
Engine: 2.0 turbo diesel
Transmission: 6 speed auto
Axle/Gears: yes, both
its running at 131 000, but its had an easy life..
its an SC with very few options, so its up at the lighter end of the thirdgen scale, too..
someone had the forethought to change to 235 / 60 / 15's, and its had the ignition advanced 4* to take advantage of our 95 RON petrol (we get 95 or 98 - workes out to about 91 and 93 in US (MON) ratings)
its an SC with very few options, so its up at the lighter end of the thirdgen scale, too..
someone had the forethought to change to 235 / 60 / 15's, and its had the ignition advanced 4* to take advantage of our 95 RON petrol (we get 95 or 98 - workes out to about 91 and 93 in US (MON) ratings)
Last edited by philoldsmobile; Nov 30, 2004 at 02:26 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,388
Likes: 2
From: Caldwell,ID
Car: 2005 BMW 545i
Engine: 4.4L N62B44
Transmission: 6spd auto
Axle/Gears: Rotating
Originally posted by anymethod
rx7speed:
My trans am's 60 ft was 2.41 and the 86 Iroc had I think like a 2.3 but i'm not sure on the Iroc. Never put in a cam without doing rear gears too. Theres no low end at all because the cam range is high and I have really low gears.
~Matt
rx7speed:
My trans am's 60 ft was 2.41 and the 86 Iroc had I think like a 2.3 but i'm not sure on the Iroc. Never put in a cam without doing rear gears too. Theres no low end at all because the cam range is high and I have really low gears.
~Matt
kinda messed up
I was pulling a better 60 foot and higher mph but around the same et
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
rx7speed:
Yea once I hit like 4000rpms in 1st it pulls hard the rest of the run, but the first 6 seconds or so in 1st gear are so slow. I'm guessing just changing the rear gears to like 3.42 or 3.73 would drop me to at least high 15s.
~Matt
Yea once I hit like 4000rpms in 1st it pulls hard the rest of the run, but the first 6 seconds or so in 1st gear are so slow. I'm guessing just changing the rear gears to like 3.42 or 3.73 would drop me to at least high 15s.
~Matt
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: Hillsborough, NJ & SJU in Philly
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: carb 305 LG4
Transmission: TH700-R4
Yea thats because you have a matched drivetrain. My low 2.73 gears keep me out of my cam range for a while. I can't do brake stands or burnouts because I just don't make any power below about 3000rpms and my stock stall is around 1800rpms.
~Matt
~Matt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
Nov 19, 2015 07:03 AM
86CamaroDan
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
2
Sep 29, 2015 10:08 PM








