Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

LB9 vs. L03

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 06:37 PM
  #1  
bfox88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Cinnaminson, NJ
Car: 90 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
LB9 vs. L03

my friends drives an 87 GTA with the 305 LB9 and an automatic trans (second owner replaced the manual with automatic.) and i drive an 88 RS with the L03, what would it take for me to get my car quicker than his. he's done mild mod's, flo-master cat-back, and he says he's got a cold air intake but i'm not to sure about that. I'm running an open element and will be replacing my stock catback soon. so what else would i need to put me over the top other than big mods such as new headers or throttle body. he hasnt touched his timing cause frankly i'm not sure he knows anything about it, would advancing my timing to 4 put me over the top?
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 06:50 PM
  #2  
90CamaroTBI's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf, MD
Car: 91 Formula, 89 IROC
Engine: LB9, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi 2.73, Posi 2.73
Putting your timing at 4 should be fine, mine is around 3-4. Headers are your best bet probably without getting too deep. You could also look into roller rockers.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #3  
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
His car runs 15.2's stock according to car and driver 87. Your car stock if I can remember ran a 15.9 in motor trend 90. 88 and 89 tbi cars gave the same performance. So id say a good cat-back,headers,intake manifold, 3.73's along with what you already have and you got him. I realize you dont want to touch headers but they are a MUST for any lg4/lo3 car. Good Luck
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #4  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Dewey316 ran 14.5 with 3.42 gears, full exhaust (headers back), and chip work. The exhaust, tune, and stock cam are the biggest bottlenecks of the LO3. You will need to pattern your car the same to see similar results. Some cat-back and open elements have hit 15.3's.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #5  
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Ya a cam swap would proably give you 35-40 extra horses. You gotta hate that stock cam.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #6  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by 89IrocZ350TPI
Ya a cam swap would proably give you 35-40 extra horses.

With tuning and fueling mods yes.

Originally posted by 89IrocZ350TPI

You gotta hate that stock cam.
Yes it is lame but Dewey did run a best of 14.5 with it.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 09:14 PM
  #7  
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
True, but mid 14's does not impress me like it use to.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 09:17 PM
  #8  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by 89IrocZ350TPI
True, but mid 14's does not impress me like it use to.
I can respect that. Stick with an LO3 for six years and you may change your mind
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 09:49 PM
  #9  
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I know what you mean. I remember the lg4 days.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #10  
bfox88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Cinnaminson, NJ
Car: 90 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
thanks for all the help guys. what's a good cam for my car and how much is it gonna run me aprox?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 02:44 PM
  #11  
robertfrank's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 62
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Car: 1988 camaro "SS"/ 1991 305/T5
Engine: 383 LT1 in progress/LT1TBI 355 soon
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 3600 stall/ T5
Axle/Gears: Moser axles, 3.42 Eaton Posi
a good starting cam would be an LT1 cam.you can get them pretty cheap on ebay.I think that with some 1.6 rockers you'll do some good damage to the Lb9.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 10:30 PM
  #12  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
There is a local guy with a NICE LB9 car. It is gorgeous. It ran a 16 at Bristol (Thunder Valley). I ran a 16.5. He had a Hypertech, K&Ns, Flowmasters, MSD ignition, and some other stuff. I had a K&N in the stock intake and Flowmasters. Not the cat back, just the muffler. Since then I installed a posi 3.23 (vs the open 2.73), open element K&N, and a Jet II. I am going to run him this spring and see if I can beat him. I hope to get some SLP headers, but I might go LS1, so that would be useless in the future. I might get might catback in, but I may not do headers til I can get the LS1. I think that I can take him this spring. What do you guys think?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2006 | 10:41 PM
  #13  
bfox88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Cinnaminson, NJ
Car: 90 IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
a 16 in an LB9 sounds slow... but what do i know.
thanks for all the feedback guys, i'm lookin into getting some rocker arms and and LT1 cam off ebay. from what i've gathered the rockers dont seem to tough to install, not sure about the camshaft though, does anyone have any experience doing this themselves?
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 10:07 AM
  #14  
robertfrank's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 62
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Car: 1988 camaro "SS"/ 1991 305/T5
Engine: 383 LT1 in progress/LT1TBI 355 soon
Transmission: Probuilt 700R4 3600 stall/ T5
Axle/Gears: Moser axles, 3.42 Eaton Posi
go to the tbi board.Shifty has a tech article explaining how to put an LT1 cam in.just remember to get your tuning squared away once you put the cam in.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2006 | 04:37 PM
  #15  
89IrocZ350TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Car: ws6
Engine: ls1
Transmission: m6
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Originally posted by bfox88
a 16 in an LB9 sounds slow... but what do i know.
Ya I thought that sounded a little slow. He may need a tuned up soon. I know the 86 LB9 cars were alot slower beacuse of the lg4 cam but even those ran mid 15's.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 12:40 PM
  #16  
91_5.7_TPI's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 5
From: East Tennesse
Car: 1991 RS Camaro
Engine: L03 (want LS1)
Transmission: 700R-4 (and T56)
Axle/Gears: 4th Gen 3.23 posi
I though so too. But, then again we were at Bristol, and it is high. An LS1 that ran 13.3s at a lower elevation track ran a 13.7 there. I could get better track times in my LO3 at a lower track. I hope.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #17  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 508
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
I can respect that. Stick with an LO3 for six years and you may change your mind
Try a TBI 2.8 (120 HP/160 ft/lbs) in a 4,500+ lbs 4x4 GMC S15 Jimmy with an automatic, a headwind and the A/C on. 2nd gear at 4,000 rpm, 12 MPG and 55 mph all day long.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 04:33 PM
  #18  
Fast355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 508
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by robertfrank
go to the tbi board.Shifty has a tech article explaining how to put an LT1 cam in.just remember to get your tuning squared away once you put the cam in.
I would actually go with the B-body LT1/Vortec Truck cam.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2006 | 07:21 PM
  #19  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Fast355
Try a TBI 2.8 (120 HP/160 ft/lbs) in a 4,500+ lbs 4x4 GMC S15 Jimmy with an automatic, a headwind and the A/C on. 2nd gear at 4,000 rpm, 12 MPG and 55 mph all day long.
A buddy of mine used to have one of those and to this day I have not riden in a slower vehicle.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2006 | 02:55 PM
  #20  
flaming-ford's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, near columbus
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
A buddy of mine used to have one of those and to this day I have not riden in a slower vehicle.
Ever been in a mid 90s s-10 with a 4 cylinder and an auto? May have that beat but, if not try a 1977 ford pickup with 3.55s and 35in tires with a 1988 300-6 turning them.

Getting up to 70 mph was insane in this truck and pretty much as fast as it will go. I once had it up to 90mph down a very big hill while having it on the floor for a good 1/4/1/2 mile before i ever hit the downhill slope lol.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2006 | 09:49 AM
  #21  
80smetalfan's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
From: Missouri
Car: 1989 IROC
Engine: LB9
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Posi
Re: LB9 vs. L03

Originally posted by bfox88
my friends drives an 87 GTA with the 305 LB9 and an automatic trans (second owner replaced the manual with automatic.) and i drive an 88 RS with the L03, what would it take for me to get my car quicker than his. he's done mild mod's, flo-master cat-back, and he says he's got a cold air intake but i'm not to sure about that. I'm running an open element and will be replacing my stock catback soon. so what else would i need to put me over the top other than big mods such as new headers or throttle body. he hasnt touched his timing cause frankly i'm not sure he knows anything about it, would advancing my timing to 4 put me over the top?
Chip (tbichips.com or better), posi, gears, exhaust

If the car is in good condition, that should get you there.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2006 | 03:38 PM
  #22  
wheelstandin87's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Waldorf,MD
Car: 87, 88 and 89 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305, and 350
Transmission: 700R, and T-5
Axle/Gears: 3:23 POSI
I Own Both and i do little work to the lo3 so im not to sure what hooks them to be fast. But ive done minor work to the Lb9 and its a dang rocketship so better chech into whats under the hood of the lb9.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
89-IROCZ-5.0TPI
TPI
10
Feb 22, 2022 09:26 PM
Jake_92RS
Tech / General Engine
8
Jan 28, 2020 10:37 PM
anesthes
TBI
5
Sep 21, 2015 10:24 AM
3.8TransAM
Body
2
Sep 17, 2015 02:16 PM
Vassago
Convertibles
15
Sep 4, 2015 09:37 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 PM.