How durable is the 2.8?
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Thunder Bay, On, Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock
How durable is the 2.8?
Hey I am restoring my 2.8 camaro and im wondering how careful I have to be with it.
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, South Carolina
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 7.75" 3.70 gear 9 bolt
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
well the block itself is cast iron along with the heads, but either way you still want to be careful because one screw up on those and you have to start all over from scratch
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10,401
Likes: 5
From: Utah
Car: 89 RS 89 iroc 87 firebird
Engine: 3.1 Turbo/ 355 twin turbo
Transmission: a4 w/ 4500 stall/ a4 / t5
Axle/Gears: strange s60 /w 3:42's
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
they can take alot, hell if i can make over 360 hp and 470ftlbs of tq on a stock bottom end motor id say its pretty dam durable
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Thunder Bay, On, Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I'm asking because my friend bought a 2.8 camaro and i drove it around the block.. I floored it a few times then the next day it seized up.. so was this just random or should i stay away from flooring my 2.8
p.s he was changing the motor anyway
p.s he was changing the motor anyway
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, South Carolina
Car: 89 RS
Engine: 2.8
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Axle/Gears: 7.75" 3.70 gear 9 bolt
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
it sounds like the guy your friend bought it from messed it up already and that is why he sold it
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Thunder Bay, On, Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
Can anyone tell me what kind of stuff they do with their 2.8.. as in burnouts or flooring it often ect.
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 354
Likes: 1
From: Manchester,PA
Car: 86 Firebird SE
Engine: 2.8L
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I have heard stories that the bottom ends like to go in the 2.8's. Over revving them will cause the rod bolts to stretch allowing the clearances to widen, then you get a drop in oil pressure then the rod knock, then lastly that rod decides to poke a hole in your block. Heard that from a Chevy mechanic. It's mostly 5 speeds that it happens to but autos can have it happen as well.
Trending Topics
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I have heard stories that the bottom ends like to go in the 2.8's. Over revving them will cause the rod bolts to stretch allowing the clearances to widen, then you get a drop in oil pressure then the rod knock, then lastly that rod decides to poke a hole in your block. Heard that from a Chevy mechanic. It's mostly 5 speeds that it happens to but autos can have it happen as well.
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 1
From: Chilliwack, B.C., Canada
Car: '88 GTA, '89, '94 Firebird, '84 T/A
Engine: 5.0L TPI (GTA); '89 -2.8; '94 -3.4
Transmission: 5 speed (for all 3),auto for T/A
Axle/Gears: 3.45 (GTA only)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I had a rod go through the block on my 1983 Firebird (5-speed, 2.8L) but that was at about 400,000 km.
I rebuilt the 2.8 on my 1989 Firebird at 425,000 km as I had a slight coolant leak at the front cover and decided what the heck, let's have some fun. So, currently have 25,000 km on a bored and stroked, heavily modded 2.8L in the '89 Firebird and no problems (it's also my DD).
So, in my opinion, these motors are almost bullet-proof.
I rebuilt the 2.8 on my 1989 Firebird at 425,000 km as I had a slight coolant leak at the front cover and decided what the heck, let's have some fun. So, currently have 25,000 km on a bored and stroked, heavily modded 2.8L in the '89 Firebird and no problems (it's also my DD).
So, in my opinion, these motors are almost bullet-proof.
Senior Member

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Tenino, Washington
Car: 89 f-bird and some others
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I had my 89 2.8 over in Germany driving in mostly hilly country, cities, and the autobahn from 100 to 130mph for 2 years.
Had it floored one day down a road trying to get some plane tickets for leave, went to shift from drive to overdrive, but it was already in OD.
8000rpm before i could blink. No problem.
Was still running great at 194k (some ticking/lifter type noise, and an exhaust manifold gasket leak) when I decided to stick in a new 3.4.
Kinda wish I'd just saved the money, or took my time building a 3.4 hybrid, and just drove the 2.8 till she blew.
Probably would have still been running decent now at 220k
Had it floored one day down a road trying to get some plane tickets for leave, went to shift from drive to overdrive, but it was already in OD.
8000rpm before i could blink. No problem.
Was still running great at 194k (some ticking/lifter type noise, and an exhaust manifold gasket leak) when I decided to stick in a new 3.4.
Kinda wish I'd just saved the money, or took my time building a 3.4 hybrid, and just drove the 2.8 till she blew.
Probably would have still been running decent now at 220k
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, PA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Vortec TPI LT4 Hotcam
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
So how durable is the 3.1L? I floor mine all the time too, but Ive noticed a small bit of coolant making its way out the front of the engine right below the goose neck, is that bad?
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: RHODE ISLAND
Car: 1988 iroc-z
Engine: 350 Vortec TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 4th gen Torsen 10bolt
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
they are good motors if maintained of and not over revved
find and fix your leak before it costs you a motor
find and fix your leak before it costs you a motor
Last edited by regal301; Dec 30, 2009 at 06:16 PM.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Hanson. MA
Car: 86 Camaro Sport; 76 Monte Carlo
Engine: 2.8 V6; 327ci V8
Transmission: 700R4; auto
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I have heard stories that the bottom ends like to go in the 2.8's. Over revving them will cause the rod bolts to stretch allowing the clearances to widen, then you get a drop in oil pressure then the rod knock, then lastly that rod decides to poke a hole in your block. Heard that from a Chevy mechanic. It's mostly 5 speeds that it happens to but autos can have it happen as well.
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1985 Camaro Z-28
Engine: LG4 305 c.i.d. (5.0L); 4 BBL.
Transmission: 700 R4 ; 4-spd. Auto. O.D.
Axle/Gears: 3:23 posi (CODE: GU5)
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
Hey,...I have an '85 305 now,..but about 5 years ago...I had a 1987 Camaro, it had a 2.8L V-6 in it, w/5-speed manual trans. The problems I heard about/had was a leaking rear main seal. Besides regular upkeep,..the 2.8L is pretty reliable and has quite a bit of snot. I ended up rebuilding another 2.8L for it while it was my DD,..that's when I found out how much power/reliability it had. While building up the motor for 3-months,..I rotted it a bit pushing its limits...trust me keep the oil clean and the 2.8L is practically "BULLETPROOF"
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
From: T.DoT, Canada
Car: 86 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305 (TPI)
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: i dunno lolz
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I spoke to a mechanic who has worked on thirdgens all his life, and he told me that the 2.8's were among some of the most reliable v6's GM ever produced. He did tell me about the infamous rod knock, but he said not to worry about that for another 200,000 KM lol . Right now my 2.8 is sitting at 120,000 KM (80,000 miles?) and it's my daily driver. Maybe some time in the future years from now it may die, but I think it has a long life ahead of it
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
I have a 1992 3.1L firebird Automatic that has 212K miles on it. It used to have a 75 HP nitrous shot on it, and it never gave any trouble whatsoever. I quit using the nitrous on it about 2 years ago, then about 1 year later it blew a head gasket. That was the only problem was the head gasket.
I have been very pleased with how my 3.1 runs and drives. Before it had 200K miles on it, I could even get 30 to 31 MPG on the interstate with the cruise set on 78 MPH.
My dad has a 1991 GMC sonoma ST with a 2.8 and a 5 speed. It has 355k Miles on it and has never had the valve covers off of it. It is getting such that it leaks and is burning a little bit of oil. Hey, it's nearly 20 years old and has been rode hard for 355K miles. Still cranks easy, though.
I have been very pleased with how my 3.1 runs and drives. Before it had 200K miles on it, I could even get 30 to 31 MPG on the interstate with the cruise set on 78 MPH.
My dad has a 1991 GMC sonoma ST with a 2.8 and a 5 speed. It has 355k Miles on it and has never had the valve covers off of it. It is getting such that it leaks and is burning a little bit of oil. Hey, it's nearly 20 years old and has been rode hard for 355K miles. Still cranks easy, though.
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
The later 2.8 and the 3.1/3.4 are much more solid then the early 2.8's. When was the balance changed? 87? 88? Any of those earlier 2.8's probably shouldn't be beat on. They tend to let go if they're abused. The 3.1/3.4 however are kinda hard to kill. I tried to kill my 91 3.1 many times, 150,000 miles, 120hp shot of nitrous, and countless beatings and it still ran fine when I sold it. I hear it's still driving.
Now my 84 Camaro 2.8 didn't survive the first beating. All stock, all original, 129k miles.
My room mate for 4 years was into Fieros... He had at least 6 2.8 blocks sitting in the scrap pile with holes in the blocks. The trick fix/upgrade for those cars was a Camaro/Firebird or Lumina APV 3.1.
Now my 84 Camaro 2.8 didn't survive the first beating. All stock, all original, 129k miles.
My room mate for 4 years was into Fieros... He had at least 6 2.8 blocks sitting in the scrap pile with holes in the blocks. The trick fix/upgrade for those cars was a Camaro/Firebird or Lumina APV 3.1.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, PA
Car: 1990 Camaro RS
Engine: 355 Vortec TPI LT4 Hotcam
Transmission: TH700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: How durable is the 2.8?
Yeah these 3.1 blocks have to be pretty damn indestructible, one time a Cobra mustang 4.6L Supercharged pulled up next to me, and i was like oh ****!!! but i gave him a run for his money and just stomped on it and well the tach went passed 7,000rpm and stayed there for a second in first until about 40 mph and then i let off of it, it was a short race, and he beat the hell out of me, but he thought i had a 350 tpi car when we pulled over and talked 
and well that was almost 8 months ago and since then ive put another 4,000 miles on the car and have had no problems, cranks right up and on no matter what, runs great, and ive had no problems with it what so ever, well except 20 year old multec injectors, lol

and well that was almost 8 months ago and since then ive put another 4,000 miles on the car and have had no problems, cranks right up and on no matter what, runs great, and ive had no problems with it what so ever, well except 20 year old multec injectors, lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RABMAN
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Sep 18, 2015 09:02 PM









