L31 with TBI, I'm confused
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: New Boston, MI
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 406 SBC
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Moser/Strange 9" 3.73, spool
L31 with TBI, I'm confused
I have a L31 (Vortec heads, you already know that though). It's going into my 86 Sierra. I want to use TBI, and I have a 2" throttle body that was used on a 4.3 Chevy boat engine. It's an actual Rochester throttle body.
So, I need some suggestions on how to get this throtte body to work with this engine. I looked at the GM Vortec to TBI intake manifold, but it doesn't look like those are 2" bores for the TBI. I'm thinking of using a carb manifold and using an adapter plate, but I'm a bit confused about what manifold ot use. Back when I was on the TBI board alot, I remember everyone saying to use a single plane over a duel plane intake. I did some searching and didn't find anyhitng on this.
What do you guys suggest I do?
So, I need some suggestions on how to get this throtte body to work with this engine. I looked at the GM Vortec to TBI intake manifold, but it doesn't look like those are 2" bores for the TBI. I'm thinking of using a carb manifold and using an adapter plate, but I'm a bit confused about what manifold ot use. Back when I was on the TBI board alot, I remember everyone saying to use a single plane over a duel plane intake. I did some searching and didn't find anyhitng on this.
What do you guys suggest I do?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 1
From: Ohio, near columbus
Car: 89 iroc-z
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: wc-t5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi (4 now)
go dual plane and buy an aftermarket carb manifold then get the tbi adapter plate for it. Something like the performer rpm or weiand stealth would be good.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: New Boston, MI
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 406 SBC
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Moser/Strange 9" 3.73, spool
Thanks for the help guys!
Is it true that the factory cam in the L31 is actually a LT1 cam? Just curious.
Thanks again!
Is it true that the factory cam in the L31 is actually a LT1 cam? Just curious.
Thanks again!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 509
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by Duke
Thanks for the help guys!
Is it true that the factory cam in the L31 is actually a LT1 cam? Just curious.
Thanks again!
Thanks for the help guys!
Is it true that the factory cam in the L31 is actually a LT1 cam? Just curious.
Thanks again!
Get a carb intake and a holley projection adapter.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: New Boston, MI
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 406 SBC
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Moser/Strange 9" 3.73, spool
I looked up the specs on the LT1 cams and to me, it looks like I'd be better off sticking with the B-car cam because it makes more torque, which is what I need in a truck that's primarly used for towing.
I ordered a Perfromer RPM intake and a Pro-Jection adapter plate. Now I just gotta tune the damn thing!
I ordered a Perfromer RPM intake and a Pro-Jection adapter plate. Now I just gotta tune the damn thing!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 509
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
B-Car LT1 cam=Vortec cam. They are the same thing, just the vortec uses a shorter dowl pin because it lacks an optispark.
The Iron LT1 heads=vortec heads.
Ever notice that they both have around 260 FWHP @ 4,600 rpm and 330 ft/lbs of torque at 2,800 rpm.
The F-body LT1 cam makes plenty of torque and boost HP. I have run it on a stock 350 ECM, a little more fuel pressure, and about 4* timing advance. Pulled anything I hooked to the 7,000 lbs capacity hitch. Including a 1994 chevy truck on a tandem axle trailer and an extra engine on that trailer. That was with 3.08 gears, P 255/70/R15s, 700r4 in 3rd gear, and running about 60 mph and about 2,600 rpm. Maintaining lockup was not a problem, the cruise held 60 easily, and the engine was very responsive even with total weight approaching 11,000-12,000 lbs.
The Iron LT1 heads=vortec heads.
Ever notice that they both have around 260 FWHP @ 4,600 rpm and 330 ft/lbs of torque at 2,800 rpm.
The F-body LT1 cam makes plenty of torque and boost HP. I have run it on a stock 350 ECM, a little more fuel pressure, and about 4* timing advance. Pulled anything I hooked to the 7,000 lbs capacity hitch. Including a 1994 chevy truck on a tandem axle trailer and an extra engine on that trailer. That was with 3.08 gears, P 255/70/R15s, 700r4 in 3rd gear, and running about 60 mph and about 2,600 rpm. Maintaining lockup was not a problem, the cruise held 60 easily, and the engine was very responsive even with total weight approaching 11,000-12,000 lbs.
Last edited by Fast355; Feb 26, 2006 at 11:45 AM.
Trending Topics
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 509
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by DM91RS
I have a 350 cop car cam. Is it similar the these?
I have a 350 cop car cam. Is it similar the these?
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: New Boston, MI
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 406 SBC
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Moser/Strange 9" 3.73, spool
Unfortunatly my little project is looking to be way too expensive, especially since I still need so many parts to get my RS up and running yet again. I'm just going to put a new L05 in the Sierra. For towing my boat or the RS, it'll be plenty of power. Plus I won't have to mess with the programming.
Thanks for the help anyway!
Thanks for the help anyway!
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10,450
Likes: 509
From: Hurst, Texas
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally posted by Duke
Unfortunatly my little project is looking to be way too expensive, especially since I still need so many parts to get my RS up and running yet again. I'm just going to put a new L05 in the Sierra. For towing my boat or the RS, it'll be plenty of power. Plus I won't have to mess with the programming.
Thanks for the help anyway!
Unfortunatly my little project is looking to be way too expensive, especially since I still need so many parts to get my RS up and running yet again. I'm just going to put a new L05 in the Sierra. For towing my boat or the RS, it'll be plenty of power. Plus I won't have to mess with the programming.
Thanks for the help anyway!
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: New Boston, MI
Car: 92 RS
Engine: 406 SBC
Transmission: 4R70W
Axle/Gears: Moser/Strange 9" 3.73, spool
Originally posted by Fast355
I feel your pain. I am putting the GM 12514811 which is the stock L05 for Medium Duty trucks into my van. I am picking it up tommorrow night. It really doesn't cost much more if you can get ahold of one. It is being discontinued from GM. It has a forged crank, forged rods, 4 bolt mains, larger diameter pushrods, mild stock ECM compatible cam, 8.7:1 compression ratio, 210 FWHP @ 3,800, 315 ft/lbs @ 2,800, and sodium filled exhaust valves. It is rated to pull like 20,000 lbs GVW in a C60 truck.
I feel your pain. I am putting the GM 12514811 which is the stock L05 for Medium Duty trucks into my van. I am picking it up tommorrow night. It really doesn't cost much more if you can get ahold of one. It is being discontinued from GM. It has a forged crank, forged rods, 4 bolt mains, larger diameter pushrods, mild stock ECM compatible cam, 8.7:1 compression ratio, 210 FWHP @ 3,800, 315 ft/lbs @ 2,800, and sodium filled exhaust valves. It is rated to pull like 20,000 lbs GVW in a C60 truck.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bubbaz28
Suspension and Chassis
10
Sep 18, 2015 02:09 PM
Denricci22
Transmissions and Drivetrain
5
Sep 18, 2015 09:02 AM
Glowsock
Tech / General Engine
2
Sep 11, 2015 11:09 PM










