Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

3.4 4th gen vs 85 Z28 3rd gen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 11:29 PM
  #1  
85cmroz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, West Virginia
Car: 1985 Camaro Z/28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: One-Wheel-WOnder 3.08
3.4 4th gen vs 85 Z28 3rd gen

This guy has been wanting to race me for a while. I think I've got what I need to beat him. He has a 1996 Camaro w/ the 3.4 engine. The only mod he has done is a Flowmaster muffler. I've got a 1985 Z28 w/LG69 305HO, Holley 600 carb, no egr, no smog, MSD distributor, dynomax muffler, 1" carb spacer. Will I have any problems?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2004 | 11:39 PM
  #2  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
should be close but I feel confident you will eventually pull on him. They got close to if not 200hp to your 190 stock. With your mods i guess 210-220 so at a bit lighter weight you should win if you run good, launch good.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:06 AM
  #3  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
hey

I've got a 1985 Z28 w/LG69 305HO
i have seen lg4 ,lb9,l69 never have i seen a lg69. i take it u have a lg4
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:08 AM
  #4  
ryans's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, Tx
Car: Trans Am, Grand Am GT, Vibe Gt
Engine: 5.0, 3.4, 1.8
Transmission: std, auto, std
You will take him the 3.4 only have 170 hp and around 21-220 tq
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:09 AM
  #5  
ryans's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Decatur, Tx
Car: Trans Am, Grand Am GT, Vibe Gt
Engine: 5.0, 3.4, 1.8
Transmission: std, auto, std
sorry 210-220 tq
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:14 AM
  #6  
85cmroz28's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
From: Huntington, West Virginia
Car: 1985 Camaro Z/28
Engine: L69
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: One-Wheel-WOnder 3.08
Just for the record, I have the 305 high output engine(code G). At least that's what my VIN tells me. It came stock with the dual snorkle air cleaner, which I was told was only included in the L69 engine.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:25 AM
  #7  
jocww's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
is this a double post. also u should win if u have a man and he has a auto i won and i was going against a 96 v6 and mine is a 84 z l69 won by 1.5 cars
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 12:41 AM
  #8  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
hold on

u have a stock L69 that came stock with ur car ???

Im pretty sure in 1985 the only ho 305 L69 came in the iroc the z28 only had a lg4 or a lb9 tpi
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 01:40 AM
  #9  
93 SHO's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Car: 93 SHO
Engine: 3.2 liter
Transmission: Automatic
iirc you have 150 hp stock w/ 240 lb/ft. He has 160 hp w/ 200 lb/ft. It may be closer than you think.....but its late and i forget what trannies you said you both had. But thats actual power levels there.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 02:55 AM
  #10  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
ok

iirc you have 150 hp stock w/ 240 lb/ft
your where right about the power but he said its a z28
85 Z28 M5,A4 LG4 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 155@4200 245@2000 4V 3.23 ---- 3.08 ----



3.4 liter/207 cid Horsepower 160 @ 4600 Torque (ft/lbs) 200 @ 3600

ur car will make max torque at 2000 rpms u should get him of the line and just keep on pulling.

Last edited by 1981z28; Oct 14, 2004 at 02:57 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 06:35 AM
  #11  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
you should win, lighter and more power

also is his stick?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2004 | 06:28 PM
  #12  
93 SHO's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Car: 93 SHO
Engine: 3.2 liter
Transmission: Automatic
If they both have a stick, the v6 MAY win.....although i expect that you should win
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #13  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Well which is it, a 96 or a 3.4L? The 93-95 cars got the 3.4L, and the 96-02 cars got the 3.8L. The 3.8L has 40 more HP and a similar torque increase. You'll take the 3.4L easy, but the 3.8L might take you.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 02:17 AM
  #14  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
Was the 3.8 the standard option in '96? I thought that was kind of the crossover year with most of them getting the 3.4L but some getting the 3.8L...or was the crossover year '95? I thought it was '96..
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 08:49 AM
  #15  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
yeah he deff loose to the newer v6... Didnt they come 190hp or 200?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 10:09 AM
  #16  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,776
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by DuronClocker
Was the 3.8 the standard option in '96? I thought that was kind of the crossover year with most of them getting the 3.4L but some getting the 3.8L...or was the crossover year '95? I thought it was '96..
The crossover year was '95 and you could get either the 3.4 or 3.8 for that model year only.

Pre '95 = 3.4
Post '95 = 3.8
'95 = Both engines

The 3.8's have 200hp and can run low to mid 15's stock. I have seen some run 12's with spray.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 03:33 PM
  #17  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
The crossover year was '95 and you could get either the 3.4 or 3.8 for that model year only.

The 3.8's have 200hp and can run low to mid 15's stock. I have seen some run 12's with spray.
The 3.8L in 95 was available with the California emissions package only. So VERY few 95 V6 cars had the 3.8L.

And only a very well driven 3.8L M5 is a low-mid 15 second car. The autos are usually a half second slower.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #18  
FbodTrek's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
If it's a 3.4 it's a higher 16 second car. If it's a 3.8 it's a mid 15 second car. I wouldn't worry about the 3.4 in a 4thgen, the car is WAYY too heavy to make good times with that motor. Stick it in a lighter car though and....well you never know. I seen a few Mazda Miatas with 3.4L V6 swaps they turn low 13's or high 12's...freaking amazing for 160 hp/200 ft/lbs
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #19  
Marc 85Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 1
From: MD
Originally posted by FbodTrek
I seen a few Mazda Miatas with 3.4L V6 swaps they turn low 13's or high 12's...freaking amazing for 160 hp/200 ft/lbs
Not with that pushrod 3.4L they didn't. That's impossible! 13s might be possible with the DOHC 3.4L though.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2004 | 08:48 PM
  #20  
ThirdGenFire's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
From: El Paso, Texas
Car: 2000 Trans Am and a 85 Iroc-Z
Engine: The Mighty LS1& 305 just beat meTPI
Transmission: 4L60E and 700R4
Dude, you will waste him. Trust on this one. We have plenty of 3.4L's in out club and mufflers and such are still slow. The 3.8L is a lot faster, the 3.4L is no biggie. One of our guys is building a 3.4L with heads, cams and such, even then you would have a good chance. Waste him already.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #21  
305RSlc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: P'cola
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4 that will magically turn into a 6 speed one day.
If it's a 96, it has the 3.8L and will probably start passing you around 50mph. If it indeed does have the 3.4L for some strange reason, you'll win. My buddy and I raced when I had a '94 with a 3.4L and he has a '85 T/A bone stock except K&N and no exhuast from the cat back....me with only my flowblocker and ebay-style CAI. He owned me, from a roll and a dig. Both cars were autos and everytime they shifted, he would gain about a car on me. Just a little food for thought.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #22  
Nate86's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Ahh, yes. The "good ol' days" of the raspy Flowmaster V6.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 01:48 PM
  #23  
Air_Adam's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 9,067
Likes: 1
From: Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Car: '83 Z28, '07 Charger SRT8
Engine: 454ci, 6.1 Hemi
Transmission: TH350, A5
Axle/Gears: 2.73 posi, 3.06 posi
If he has an L69 (G says he does) then he has 190hp and 240 ft-lbs. He should also have a 5-speen manual and 3.73 gears.

190hp doesn't sound like much, but its a pretty potent engine. That engine likes to rev, and the trans and gears let it do that.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 02:28 PM
  #24  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
L69's make power peak at 4800 rpm. Not exactly revving but 3.73's would work good for that and be shifting at like 5300 rpm.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #25  
1981z28's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
well

If he has an L69 (G says he does)
if he does not have a lg4 then he des not have the stock motor.




85 Z28 M5,A4 LG4 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 155@4200 245@2000 4V 3.23 ---- 3.08 ----
85 Z28 A4 LB9 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 215@4400 275@3200 TPI ---- ---- 3.23 ----
85 IROC M5,A4 LG4 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 155@4200 245@2000 4V 3.23 ---- 3.23 ----
85 IROC M5 L69 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 190@4800 240@3200 4VHO 3.73 ---- ---- ----
85 IROC A4 LB9 V8 9.5:1 5.0 (305) 215@4400 275@3200 TPI ---- ---- 3.23 3.42



as you can see hte only h.o 305 came in a iroc. as while as the only L69 witch is the 305 h.o

the hole time i was under the impression your car had the factory motor i wish you would had said i swap it for a h.o 305 L69.


i still think u will win.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 08:31 PM
  #26  
305RSlc's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: P'cola
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4 that will magically turn into a 6 speed one day.
Originally posted by Nate86
Ahh, yes. The "good ol' days" of the raspy Flowmaster V6.
F*ck you HO!! My 3.4L just lost because I didn't have traction with my mad torque yo'. You're just lucky I didn't have a 3 foot wing to add downforce so I could beat you. And it would have been all over if I had NAWSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

Seriously though, we have to race my new L98 against yours...then we'll see. Bwahahaha.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #27  
Spectre's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
LOL why the hell did GM switch to the 3.4 ?

You have a lighter car, better engine, gesrs dont know but still ..

My money is on the V8
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2004 | 09:20 PM
  #28  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,776
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Spectre
LOL why the hell did GM switch to the 3.4 ?

Bigger motor for a bigger car. The 3.1 in a 4th gen would have become a modern iron duke.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 11:57 AM
  #29  
pvt num 11's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
From: Wahiawa, Hawai'i
Car: 1989 TTA
Engine: LC2
Transmission: Worn-out 200R4
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.27's
Yup, the LHO was a funny motor - I had one in my '89 Grand Prix. That car wasn't very light either, but it had a good Cd. I always wanted to toss in a 3.4 DOHC motor in it... Except those motors (vin code X, right?) if they needed work, were a terror to work on, or so I've heard. I can see the need for more displacement for hte base motor when the 4th gen came out. My friend had a '95 with a 3.4, it seemed really sluggish - but then again, his motor was jacked up and knocked terribly, and the body lines were slightly crooked, ect... My L98 would've ate that car up without even trying. Heck, my WIFE'S car ('96 GP) could've beat him...
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #30  
Spectre's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Bigger motor for a bigger car. The 3.1 in a 4th gen would have become a modern iron duke.
I meant going to a 3.4 from a 3.8 .. makes no sense ..
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #31  
kretos's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,383
Likes: 0
From: surrey b.c. canada
Car: 89 Iroc
Engine: lb9
Transmission: wc t-5
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt 3.08 posi
if its the 3.4 you'll smoke him, if its the 3.8 he might have you
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 06:24 PM
  #32  
Nate86's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 1
From: Pensacola, FL
Car: 1999 Saturn SL2
Engine: 4 cylinder
Transmission: 4-speed automatic
Originally posted by 305RSlc
F*ck you HO!! My 3.4L just lost because I didn't have traction with my mad torque yo'. You're just lucky I didn't have a 3 foot wing to add downforce so I could beat you. And it would have been all over if I had NAWSSSSSSSSSSS!!!

Seriously though, we have to race my new L98 against yours...then we'll see. Bwahahaha.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:06 PM
  #33  
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
Supporter/Moderator
25 Year Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,776
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Spectre
I meant going to a 3.4 from a 3.8 .. makes no sense ..
Ah I gottcha. But yes GM went from the 3.4 to the 3.8. Or am I missing something still?
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2004 | 09:08 PM
  #34  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i dont know, but bigger is better in my opinion!!
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #35  
Spectre's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
my bad, they went from the 3.4 to the 3.8 ..
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:26 PM
  #36  
THEGENERAL's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Staunton,illinois
Car: 1966 impala , 1998 sebring vert,1978 buick regal turbo, 1991 chevy silverado 3/4ton 4x4 lifted
Engine: 283, 2.5,3.8 turbo 350
Transmission: powerglide,auto overdrive, th350,4L80
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
i dont know, but bigger is better in my opinion!!
i know its not much of an improvement but

There is no replacement for Displacement.....

even if it is just .4 of a liter...LOL
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2004 | 06:43 PM
  #37  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
Hell ya dude, .4 liter is alot more than 0 liters
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992rs/ss
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
14
Jan 31, 2025 05:10 PM
1992rs/ss
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
16
Jan 28, 2016 09:58 PM
Warlocksirix
Suspension and Chassis
27
Sep 3, 2015 12:26 PM
jbd1969
Tech / General Engine
1
Aug 17, 2015 07:06 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 AM.