MTX SHO
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
MTX SHO
anybody ever race one of these other than me? my experience was way bad to the muscle car name. i went down by at least 10 cars no lie. anybody got any races with beating them to make me feel better?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
yes SHOs as in taurus'
and yes it was the silver one on the pike before his new motor. there was a video of it but it doesnt play anymore on the site it was on. but it was very very sad and thats why im looking to buy a SHO soon now.
and yes it was the silver one on the pike before his new motor. there was a video of it but it doesnt play anymore on the site it was on. but it was very very sad and thats why im looking to buy a SHO soon now.
Trending Topics
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,538
Likes: 206
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by vipershark11
...but it was very very sad and thats why im looking to buy a SHO soon now.
Moderator




Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
If this helps any, there is a SHO by my house. He had a 10.1 1/8 time on his window. It sounds like it has an exhaust too.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
yea its for a daily/beater i wouldnt ditch my firebird i love the thing wayyy too much. but ive seen what they are capable of and i found a nice deal on one that is an offer i cant refuse. but i think he was stock the one i raced or he had a y pipe only when he ran the 1/4 in 14.5 i believe it was i know it was mid 14s. o wait he had solid motor mounts a kevlar clutch and the y pipe thats it. ive driven the car and have rode in it a lot and it is a comfortable car. yes i know its a ford but hella nice sleeper i must say if someone doesnt know about them like i didnt. my 305tbi just isnt enough for me and upgrading is too much plus i need a nice fwd winter beater/daily
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
you just have a bad motor in your car. and L03 is not a muscle car. L98 isnt all that either but its a start.
get a 350 or bigger motor and built it up some. then you wont need to worry about SHO's and other cars
get a 350 or bigger motor and built it up some. then you wont need to worry about SHO's and other cars
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,538
Likes: 206
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by hihighost
Yeah man...I certainly would not have expected to take down a SHO in my L03.
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10,538
Likes: 206
From: NYC / Jersey
Car: 1990 Trans Am GTA
Engine: Turbo 305 w/MS2
Transmission: 700R4
Originally Posted by hihighost
No, I'm sorry. I meant to say in a L03. I do not have another F-body.
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA.
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
Originally Posted by Street Lethal
I know, I was just teasing ya. 

...My L03 were I to own an L03, my L03 if I imagined I owned an L03, my L03 if I was oblivious as to what engine the L03 was and thought I owned an L03, or his L03, the SHO's putting out some good numbers. Stock L03'll have trouble.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I have heard about that SHO a lot. Kis thinks its a lot more basa$$ than it really is. And judging by the 14.5 (Im sure there was more done than the mods he tells you, where did he run that also?) it has been built up a lot more than it can back up. Oh well another 14 second turnpike racer Im sure...
But I do like SHOs!
But I do like SHOs!
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
are they fast....NO, but they arnt terriably slow. My buddys' bone stock sho ran a 14.9, they move pretty good once they get into there powerband (4k and up).
Thats enough to beat a lot of us 3rd gens
Thats enough to beat a lot of us 3rd gens
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA.
Car: 1987 Camaro
Engine: Carb'd L31 Vortec 350
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen / 3.23
Originally Posted by ThirdGenLS1
are they fast....NO, but they arnt terriably slow. My buddys' bone stock sho ran a 14.9, they move pretty good once they get into there powerband (4k and up).
Thats enough to beat a lot of us 3rd gens
Thats enough to beat a lot of us 3rd gens

Haha, certainly not your thirdgen though.
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
From: in front of mustangs
Car: 91 z-28 conv.
Engine: 350 vortec tpi crate
Transmission: 700r4
i owned one several years ago. it was fun, most people didn't know what it was so you could suprise a lot of folks. had a bunch of fun with a mustang gt one nite.
fast, not really, but decent.
i think the early ones with the 5 spd were the quickest.
fast, not really, but decent.
i think the early ones with the 5 spd were the quickest.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
yea the one im getting a deal on is the 89 which is suppossed to be the fastest year they made them. and i WAS friends with nick with the silver SHO on the pike and i knew his mods. all it was was a stock 3.0L with over 100k miles 5 speed, solid motor mounts, kervlar clutch, y pipe, removed the air filter, thats it nothing else. ask a someone that really knows about SHOs there are a few freakish ones that hit 14s stock. and the y pipe alone on those cars makes sick *** power i think its 20hp. the kid did think his car was kickass but you have to admit for damn near close to stock it is. you dont expect that huge car to going flying past you.
my dad has the L98 IROC and ive driven it before and i know the difference in power. the L98 isnt even close to my little LO3 i can floor it and he can maybe half throttle and hell fly past me. man i love his car and the SHO would be a nice match for a stock L98 and would just eat all the others even with mild mods. the powerband in the SHO is so long i think its either 3 or 4k-7K rpms so its really nothing to laugh at.
and i cant touch my LO3 cause it only has 50k miles on it and my dad wont allow so my thought was get a quick winter beater
----------
and i also have vids of the silver SHO racing and ive been in the car while racing. it beat a modified GTP with a smaller pulley, upgraded ignition, cold air intake, and a catback without cats i believe. the SHO and this kid were even every race and both were going all out.
then i have a video of the SHO vs a 01' mustang GT 4.6L 5 speed. the mustang had a catback and intake on it. they raced to like 120 and the SHO stayed ahead by about a car.
my dad has the L98 IROC and ive driven it before and i know the difference in power. the L98 isnt even close to my little LO3 i can floor it and he can maybe half throttle and hell fly past me. man i love his car and the SHO would be a nice match for a stock L98 and would just eat all the others even with mild mods. the powerband in the SHO is so long i think its either 3 or 4k-7K rpms so its really nothing to laugh at.
and i cant touch my LO3 cause it only has 50k miles on it and my dad wont allow so my thought was get a quick winter beater
----------
and i also have vids of the silver SHO racing and ive been in the car while racing. it beat a modified GTP with a smaller pulley, upgraded ignition, cold air intake, and a catback without cats i believe. the SHO and this kid were even every race and both were going all out.
then i have a video of the SHO vs a 01' mustang GT 4.6L 5 speed. the mustang had a catback and intake on it. they raced to like 120 and the SHO stayed ahead by about a car.
Last edited by vipershark11; Jun 15, 2006 at 09:24 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: SOCAL
Car: 1991 Camaro
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T56
they are a good 14 second car with some mods, but aftermarket for that car really sucks, and yes the y-pipe on that thing sucks, but man they want a arm and leg for a new one
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Yes that kid Nick has quite the BAD reputation because he has taken down a few average cars... beating a newer GT by a car is alright, but nothing special. I guess the fact I have ehard sooo much about this car, and it really is nothing a mild bolt on anything would take down.
Im not going to worry about pulling up next to it (I was actually told once, he would beat me, HAHA
)
Personally Id love to own a 93-95 MTX SHO, but just dont have the means to sell one car to buy another!
Im not going to worry about pulling up next to it (I was actually told once, he would beat me, HAHA
)Personally Id love to own a 93-95 MTX SHO, but just dont have the means to sell one car to buy another!
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 2
From: CT
Car: 92 trans am clone
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700r4
from your signature i would not be afriad either. i wasnt afriad at first when i didnt know what ti was then he took off and i didnt know what happens. but that kids a douche bag i know his games
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





