V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Just A thought about a 2.8 to 3.1-3.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 02:40 PM
  #1  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
Just A thought about a 2.8 to 3.1-3.4

OK I have lived in cali for a few years now and 1 thing I have learned is in engine modding around here is if it cant be seen than its will most likly pass smog with out much problem.. IE: like stroking a 350 to a 383.. smags jsut fine and no quiesting asked.. So here my thought.. could I use a 3.1 or 3.4 block and innards and the 2.8 intake and assory.. IE alt, steering, A/C brackets and units.. And how about the ECM and wiring?
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #2  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
yes you can. you just use the 3.4 Block, waterpump, and the 3.4 injectors in the 2.8 fuel rail. the injectors are the same only the 3.4 ones deliver more fuel to makeup for the larger displacement.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 02:57 PM
  #3  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
Cool.. So I can make a sleeper 3.4 with 2.8 marking and parts..
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:03 PM
  #4  
Project: 85 2.8 bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,461
Likes: 0
From: BFE, MD
Car: 13 Ram 1500/ 78 Formy
Engine: 5.7 / 7.4
Transmission: 6sp / TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.55 posi / 3.23
read up on Karls' (KED85) article in the tech article section. He did this swap on his 85 Bird & Blazer.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:14 PM
  #5  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
I looked at that.. not any real info.. I like to know if my ECM needs to be changed and if the harness needs changing also.. or are we talking a direct replacment here? Just swap block and parts? or will I need diffrent exh, oilpan, or is this all justa bolt on job.. Smog here can really tie me up if thay find a excues to not pass it here.. And I have to also pass a light, brake check.. ( Have no clue what there looking for there.. ) Never had to do that one before..
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:19 PM
  #6  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
the 3.4 is bolt for bolt Identical to a 2.8L block exept for 2 differences i know of, the waterpump circulates in the opposite direction which is no big deal cause you just use the 3.4 pump, and it dont have a boss for a mechanical clutch on the rear of the block, no big deal cause you have a Auto. the ECU and everything else will work on the 3.4 you only need to change the injectors to the higher flow 3.4 injectors to compensate for the extra CID.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #7  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
Thats great news.. Im going to keep my eye out for the next pick and pull sale on engine and grab up one..
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:43 PM
  #8  
Thunderfest's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
The 3.4 RWD block has a distictive "F" casting on the side of it as well as cross hatch reinforcement ribbing as seen here. The FWD 3.4 and the rwd 2.8 and 3.1's do not have these markings and reinforcment.
Attached Thumbnails Just A thought about a 2.8 to 3.1-3.4-fblock1.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:45 PM
  #9  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
ok? So do not get that block?
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:48 PM
  #10  
Thunderfest's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Originally posted by madathlon
ok? So do not get that block?
DO look for that block casting on engines in a salvage yard. Its the one you DO want.

GM has stopped making these motors as crate replacement engines last year when the 4th gen 3.4 became over 10 years old. You can only find them used now.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:50 PM
  #11  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
no problem.. I was planning on pullng one for a S yard anyway..
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #12  
Thunderfest's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
So you know, I am actually an old member around here with 1000's of post, just an new name (Long story)

Anyways, I too live in So Calif (City of Orange)and am going to be putting my 3.4 into my wifescar within about the next year- Its a proven smog inspection passing stealth swap. I need to finish major house projects first then I will finish my motor project. I do know these cars like the back of my hand. Any info you need on suspensions etc, just ask and I can help point you as to whats the best bang for the buck. Most of everything I have done to our 3rd gen is custom 1 of a kind stuff though. Here's a link to it.

https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/att...postid=2162232
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/518752/1

Last edited by Thunderfest; Feb 12, 2006 at 04:00 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #13  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
Cool looking.. So U know about dealing with cali smog.. I had a 86 Ford Ranger that wouldnt pass smog becouse a code keeped popping up for a tranny problem.. that real problem it was a code for a auto and it was a 5 speed..
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:27 PM
  #14  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
Hmm is this where a Fan switch goes on a 2.8?
Attached Thumbnails Just A thought about a 2.8 to 3.1-3.4-fblock1-copy.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #15  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
Just a thought tho.. what cars have the 3.4 block that I will be looking for?
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:37 PM
  #16  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
93+ Firebirds and camaros that came with V6s. some where in the middle of the 4th gen run they changed to 3.8s but i dont know when they switched.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #17  
Nocturnall's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, NH
Car: 91 Firebird
Engine: 191ci 6cyl
Transmission: 700r4
93 - 95 I beleive. Camero and firebirds.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 04:50 PM
  #18  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I created a thread with all your answers, and step by step directions.


https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...hreadid=339280
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2006 | 05:06 PM
  #19  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
thats great info Dale.. thanks for the tech.. Now I have a full plan ..
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 01:50 AM
  #20  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
Originally posted by Thunderfest
The 3.4 RWD block has a distictive "F" casting on the side of it as well as cross hatch reinforcement ribbing as seen here. The FWD 3.4 and the rwd 2.8 and 3.1's do not have these markings and reinforcment.

in this picture, where is the sensor that has to be moved? I think it was the crank position sensor or something?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 02:22 AM
  #21  
iroc-z's's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: huntington bch ca
Car: 88 camaro rs
Transmission: auto
how much more hp will the 3.4 block give you over the 2.8 block?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 02:30 AM
  #22  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
Originally posted by iroc-z's
how much more hp will the 3.4 block give you over the 2.8 block?
ooo I got this one!

2.8 = 135 hp

3.4 = 160 hp
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 02:30 AM
  #23  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
Originally posted by iroc-z's
how much more hp will the 3.4 block give you over the 2.8 block?
ooo I got this one!

2.8 = 135 hp

3.4 = 160 hp
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 05:40 AM
  #24  
Dale's Avatar
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 3
From: AR
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
Originally posted by 1989karr
in this picture, where is the sensor that has to be moved? I think it was the crank position sensor or something?
Read the thread I linked too.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #25  
iroc-z's's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: huntington bch ca
Car: 88 camaro rs
Transmission: auto
Originally posted by 1989karr
ooo I got this one!

2.8 = 135 hp

3.4 = 160 hp

ya but will the 2.8 intake make a loss of any hp?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 09:26 PM
  #26  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
the 3.4intake plenum is the same on the bottom they just changed it to clear the 4th gen hood. i have seen one and it did not look like it had any more flow capacity.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 11:13 PM
  #27  
The_Raven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by Thunderfest
The 3.4 RWD block has a distictive "F" casting on the side of it as well as cross hatch reinforcement ribbing as seen here. The FWD 3.4 and the rwd 2.8 and 3.1's do not have these markings and reinforcment.
Just wanted to correct this info, the FWD 3.4 AKA 3400 does indeed have the reinforment, also the block around the cylinders is buldged, to provide a higher capacity of coolant, around the cylinders.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 11:17 PM
  #28  
madathlon's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Redding, Ca
Car: 1988 Camaro, 1960 F-100
Engine: 2.8L V6, 223 inline 6
Transmission: TH-700R4, T98
Axle/Gears: 3.42/3.11 Posi Lock
Originally posted by The_Raven
Just wanted to correct this info, the FWD 3.4 AKA 3400 does indeed have the reinforment, also the block around the cylinders is buldged, to provide a higher capacity of coolant, around the cylinders.
So this would better handle the higher heat around here than if I get this right.. More coolent means better cooling compacty..
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:15 AM
  #29  
xplane's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Car: 85 camaro sport coupe
Engine: 2.8 MFI
Transmission: v6 700R4 wish it was a 5spd Stick
Axle/Gears: Stock non posi 3.42s
only of you want to F with trying to fit a FWD block with very different mounts into a RWD car. it can be done cause i think some one on here on TGO was talking about it. I think it was doward?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 08:40 AM
  #30  
The_Raven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: The Nest
Car: 1985 GMC Jimmy/1998 Chevy Malibu
Engine: 3.2L turbo Hybrid/bone stock 3100
Transmission: T-5 soon to be 700R4/4T40E
Originally posted by xplane
only of you want to F with trying to fit a FWD block with very different mounts into a RWD car. it can be done cause i think some one on here on TGO was talking about it. I think it was doward?
This si true, the FWD block is not a blot in to the RWD chassis.

I will most likely be starting with a FWD block for my Frankenbeast build, since I'll hgave to fit the chassis to it anyway. Still looking for a good chassis.
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 02:04 PM
  #31  
rover420's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: amherstburg (windsor) Ontario Canada
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: limited slip posi 3.42
on that pic u posted the one part that is circled with black is that the sensor everyone says gets in the way and is a bitch cause i just pulled out a monkey wrench took it off and stuck a hex plug that is used by plumbers.
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #32  
redbird8628's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: Highlands, NJ
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 3.4 outa 95' bird
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open rear
and 160 ft lbs - 200ft lbs!!!, i gave up on removing the damn plug from the head, i drilled and tapped a hole 11/16" drill bit and 3/8" pipe tread tap, but when i swapped heads i smashed the fan switch that i had moved and it was in a tight spot..so i ended up putting a fan switch back in its original spot since the hole was open..it might be cheaper to ask for a 3.4 short block and have your 2.8 heads rebuilt or get new ones and put them on, because based on what ive read, it takes WAYY to long to remove that plug...and you could have swapped in new heads by then and not ever have to worry about that valvetrain breaking down. i wish i did that first, cuase i cooked valves on both heads and replaced them both anyway
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 03:55 PM
  #33  
rover420's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: amherstburg (windsor) Ontario Canada
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: limited slip posi 3.42
oh u guys are talking abou that sensor on the corner of the one head? cause i'm just gunna leave it in if worked b4 with it in it will work again.
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #34  
1989karr's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 201
From: Hawaii
Car: 89' Firebird / 87' Formula
Engine: 3.4 / 5.0
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / 3.42
I say send the heads to a machine shop and have them deal with the removal of that plug
Reply
Old May 9, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #35  
rover420's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
From: amherstburg (windsor) Ontario Canada
Car: 88 camaro
Engine: 3.4
Transmission: t-5
Axle/Gears: limited slip posi 3.42
does it end up getting in the way?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GeneralIesrussi
Carburetors
6
Jun 20, 2024 07:21 PM
86maro_252
Tech / General Engine
6
Oct 10, 2015 06:52 PM
RABMAN
Interior Parts Wanted
2
Sep 18, 2015 09:02 PM
89bird2.8
TBI
15
Sep 18, 2015 07:46 PM
IROCZ1989
Transmissions and Drivetrain
2
Sep 4, 2015 11:54 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:33 PM.