Roush???..are they that fast?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,571
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Car: Kitt
Engine: Classified
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Moser/4:11
Roush???..are they that fast?
There's a Roush Mustanf in my town, not sure of the year, but it's the newer Mustang body style. What's it got in it, and would a modded LT1 take it ya think? Also, there's a few Saleens at school...how much different are they than Roushes? Thanks,
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
There are three stages of the roush. Stage one is just appearance and stage two is exhaust intake and a few other goodies. The stage three is all of the above plus a super charger. they make 380 horse and are fairly wuick. A little quicker than a stock LS1 but slower than the new 03 cobra. If the LT1 is modded it will destroy stages 1 and 2 and will give stage 3 a run if it has at least a cam
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
theyre suppose to be quick. a saleen depending on which stage but normally stage for stage will beat a roush but id rather get a steeda package
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Novi. MI
Car: 87 Camaro LS
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T-5 World Class
Axle/Gears: 3.08 Open baby!!
The Roush also in Stage 3 form is given a bunch of handling things..like sway bars, springs and such. This makes launching them virtually impossible. If the kid is an idiot, go for it what you got to lose, he has a supercharger and paid ALOT more money.
I'd stay away from the saleens the S281 is a real bear
I'd stay away from the saleens the S281 is a real bear
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,775
Likes: 567
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
The saleens are in a whole other ball game and pack the punch. The roush cars look and sound incredible with the side exit exahust but aren't real competitors. Funny to read on LS1.com and camaroz28.com about all the stock LT1 and LS1 guys laying the smack on the 40K fords.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
My uncle has a Roush Stage 1, which has appearence mods and side exhaust. Absolutely gorgeous car and a nice exhaust note with the side exit exhaust (too quiet for my taste though).
As far as power, I was not impressed by the car, I'm sure it runs whatever a stock GT runs. My stock LS1 could destroy it.
The most powerful are the supercharged Stage 3's, which ran 12.9 @ 111 for Car and Driver.
Price as tested: $50,558 (base price: $40,704)
Engine type: supercharged and intercooled SOHC 16-valve V-8, iron block and aluminum heads, Ford EEC-V/Roush engine-control system with port fuel injection
Displacement 281 cu in, 4601cc
Power (SAE net) 360 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Torque (SAE net) 375 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
Transmission 5-speed manual
Zero to 60 mph 4.3 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph 4.7 sec
Standing 1/4-mile 12.9 sec @ 111 mph
Top speed (drag limited) 164 mph
C/D-observed fuel economy 13 mpg
A lightly modded LS1 could beat 12.9 @ 111. And it wouldn't take a whole lot for an LT1 either, maybe bolt-ons and a decent cam.
As far as power, I was not impressed by the car, I'm sure it runs whatever a stock GT runs. My stock LS1 could destroy it.
The most powerful are the supercharged Stage 3's, which ran 12.9 @ 111 for Car and Driver.
Price as tested: $50,558 (base price: $40,704)
Engine type: supercharged and intercooled SOHC 16-valve V-8, iron block and aluminum heads, Ford EEC-V/Roush engine-control system with port fuel injection
Displacement 281 cu in, 4601cc
Power (SAE net) 360 bhp @ 5250 rpm
Torque (SAE net) 375 lb-ft @ 3000 rpm
Transmission 5-speed manual
Zero to 60 mph 4.3 sec
Street start, 5-60 mph 4.7 sec
Standing 1/4-mile 12.9 sec @ 111 mph
Top speed (drag limited) 164 mph
C/D-observed fuel economy 13 mpg
A lightly modded LS1 could beat 12.9 @ 111. And it wouldn't take a whole lot for an LT1 either, maybe bolt-ons and a decent cam.
Last edited by BuckeyeROC; Nov 18, 2003 at 10:33 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Found info. about Saleens right from their site:
Saleen S281 Coupe
14.0*/99.0
$36,629
Saleen S281 Supercharged Coupe
13.0*/108.0
$42,322
Saleen S281 Extreme Coupe
12.5*/113
$61,120
Saleen S281 Coupe
14.0*/99.0
$36,629
Saleen S281 Supercharged Coupe
13.0*/108.0
$42,322
Saleen S281 Extreme Coupe
12.5*/113
$61,120
Last edited by BuckeyeROC; Nov 18, 2003 at 10:38 PM.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5,144
Likes: 2
From: CC, TX
Car: 1999 Yamaha Banshee
Engine: 379cc twin cyl 2-stroke stroker
Transmission: 6 spd manual
Axle/Gears: 14/41 tooth
Yup, I took a supercharged S281, haha didnt get to race that long though (first and maybe a split second of second)...
That race cost me though, $110 and 90 days probation...
That race cost me though, $110 and 90 days probation...
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh,NY
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by BuckeyeROC
Found info. about Saleens right from their site:
Saleen S281 Coupe
14.0*/99.0
$36,629
Saleen S281 Supercharged Coupe
13.0*/108.0
$42,322
Saleen S281 Extreme Coupe
12.5*/113
$61,120
Found info. about Saleens right from their site:
Saleen S281 Coupe
14.0*/99.0
$36,629
Saleen S281 Supercharged Coupe
13.0*/108.0
$42,322
Saleen S281 Extreme Coupe
12.5*/113
$61,120
Re: Roush???..are they that fast?
Originally posted by tamatt27
There's a Roush Mustanf in my town, not sure of the year, but it's the newer Mustang body style. What's it got in it, and would a modded LT1 take it ya think? Also, there's a few Saleens at school...how much different are they than Roushes? Thanks,
There's a Roush Mustanf in my town, not sure of the year, but it's the newer Mustang body style. What's it got in it, and would a modded LT1 take it ya think? Also, there's a few Saleens at school...how much different are they than Roushes? Thanks,
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
From: cali
Car: 84z, 65 elcamino
Engine: l69 and a hyped up sbc in the camino
Transmission: t5 m21
Axle/Gears: 373s 411s
becareful though. i raced what i thought was just a stage 1 roush turns out it had saleen sc on it with some steeda stuff. i was in the camino and he kept up through 3rd and then he just blew right by. if i was in teh maro it wouldnt have been fun. old man driving it too. nice too
Supreme Member

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,751
Likes: 4
From: Bonner Springs, KS
Car: 1995 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 6 spd Manual
Axle/Gears: Dana 44, 3:45:1
I used to work with a guy that had a roush stage 1 mustang.. It had a 3.8L v6 with manual trans...
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by jocww
doest saleen make a s351
doest saleen make a s351
I saw on car&driver a new roush stage 3. had a 4.6 with better exhaust, intake, t/b, and a roots type supercharger. They said it ran a 12.3 @111. w/380hp(crank). Does this sound right? If that's true, does GM got a car that can hang with these Stage 3's and Saleen S281's?
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by GTA_fan
I saw on car&driver a new roush stage 3. had a 4.6 with better exhaust, intake, t/b, and a roots type supercharger. They said it ran a 12.3 @111. w/380hp(crank). Does this sound right? If that's true, does GM got a car that can hang with these Stage 3's and Saleen S281's?
I saw on car&driver a new roush stage 3. had a 4.6 with better exhaust, intake, t/b, and a roots type supercharger. They said it ran a 12.3 @111. w/380hp(crank). Does this sound right? If that's true, does GM got a car that can hang with these Stage 3's and Saleen S281's?
Ford doesn't really make those cars, aftermarket tuners do (Roush and Saleen). As for GM itself making a car to compete, the ZO6 runs better than 111 mph. I've seen bone stock ZO6 vettes run 12.4-12.5 @ 115-116 at Milan (crappy track) on stock tires.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
From: CT
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
The mph did seem low for the 12.3 especially fron C&D or any other mag where they dont get the best times out of cars. And yes a Z06 should hang with or outrun one of those, I am not a huge fan of the tuner or whatever you call them...
Originally posted by BuckeyeROC
Did C&D really get a 12.3 @ 111 mph out of it? That seems like a pretty low ET for the MPH for Car and Driver to get on stock tires. I know 12.3 @ 111 is VERY doable, but I've never seen them get such a low ET out of a mph like that.
Ford doesn't really make those cars, aftermarket tuners do (Roush and Saleen). As for GM itself making a car to compete, the ZO6 runs better than 111 mph. I've seen bone stock ZO6 vettes run 12.4-12.5 @ 115-116 at Milan (crappy track) on stock tires.
Did C&D really get a 12.3 @ 111 mph out of it? That seems like a pretty low ET for the MPH for Car and Driver to get on stock tires. I know 12.3 @ 111 is VERY doable, but I've never seen them get such a low ET out of a mph like that.
Ford doesn't really make those cars, aftermarket tuners do (Roush and Saleen). As for GM itself making a car to compete, the ZO6 runs better than 111 mph. I've seen bone stock ZO6 vettes run 12.4-12.5 @ 115-116 at Milan (crappy track) on stock tires.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
From: Ohio, USA
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Originally posted by GTA_fan
I just saw it again to confirm and that's what they said, I thought you would need more than 380 bhp to get low 12's, (someone check me on that) maybe that's without the options though? If it makes a difference, they had mario andretti driving it, it had a black hood(I didn't notice that on previous models), and they said they had a magnaflow cat-back on it. I didn't have dr's either just bfg street radials. BuckeyeROC, you have a fast car, how much hp does your iroc have?
I just saw it again to confirm and that's what they said, I thought you would need more than 380 bhp to get low 12's, (someone check me on that) maybe that's without the options though? If it makes a difference, they had mario andretti driving it, it had a black hood(I didn't notice that on previous models), and they said they had a magnaflow cat-back on it. I didn't have dr's either just bfg street radials. BuckeyeROC, you have a fast car, how much hp does your iroc have?
No idea how much HP I have. My guess is I have a raceweight of 3600-3650 lbs. It's a fully optioned 89 IROC, with a/c, power everything, etc still. Only things that would really reduce weight would be aluminum heads, front sway bar currently off, fiberglass hood (not much lighter than stock), and I took the radio out. But I added Spohn subframe connectors, so that negates some of it. Also add 280 lbs for the driver. Like I said, I'm guessing around 3600-3650 raceweight. Anyone have a decent HP calc???
My HP guess is about 400 HP at the crank, and a bit over 400 ft/lbs of TQ.
Last edited by BuckeyeROC; Dec 1, 2003 at 10:36 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sreZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Oct 22, 2015 08:21 AM






