Could I Beat Mitsubishi
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
Could I Beat Mitsubishi
could i beat a mitsubishi something er other with a turbo in it?? its an aftermarket turbo and its a crappy lookin car, 80s maybe early 90s car...the kid rides it around here like its hot sh** but i wanna show him what really is hot sh**...i gotta 89 iroc 305 tpi convt (dont forget convertible is heavier and 18" longer than a regular camaro) shes runnin good with 75,000 miles
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Clearfield,Utah
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC, 1989 IROC
Engine: built 305, stock 305 tpi
Transmission: Corvette 700r4, t-5
Axle/Gears: 4.10 posi, 3.08 posi
thats a little vauge on the discription. but i would say if it is anything besides an a eclipse i am sure you will be fine.
#4
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,272
Likes: 0
Received 396 Likes
on
302 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Even if you achieve victory I wouldn't say you are hot stuff either with a 3600lb car powered by a 305. More info would be needed about your potential opponent.
#5
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Streamwood, IL
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: TPI 5.7 L
Transmission: 4L60 w/Vigilante 2,400 Stall
Axle/Gears: Girdled 10 bolt/3.23's
If it's an Eclipse or 3000 GT, you'll probably lose.
#6
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
nono its nothing fancy hes got like a base mitsubishi, i just dont know the name of it cuz i really dont follow the import world..at all....so sorry for the lack of info
Trending Topics
#9
Originally posted by subliminal
3600lbs?! my car is just under 3000
3600lbs?! my car is just under 3000
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North --RI
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 caddy PIMP
Engine: 4.8
Transmission: i dunno
eclipse gsxs even in the early 90s had something like 200 horse. if its had any work done to it watch out for sure!
Nate
Nate
#11
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
next time i see the pos i'll takea look
#14
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
be bought the turbo off of ebay, used, for like 50 bucks, the car didn't even come with one to begin with so its not like it was anything special
#15
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Quad cities IL
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 96 s-10, and 89 camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI with alot of mods
Transmission: 700R4 B&M shift kit
a guy that lived down the street slapped a turbo on a sundance and it ran a 14.8 W 6-8psi of boost so watch out.
#16
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: A4
oh well i was assuming it came as a turbo from the factory, if he just bought some turbo, odds are especially for 50 bucks that it ****...race em and find out. You'll proly win now that i think about it
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Re: Could I Beat Mitsubishi
Originally posted by 89IROCCVRT
could i beat a mitsubishi something er other with a turbo in it?? its an aftermarket turbo and its a crappy lookin car, 80s maybe early 90s car...the kid rides it around here like its hot sh** but i wanna show him what really is hot sh**...i gotta 89 iroc 305 tpi convt (dont forget convertible is heavier and 18" longer than a regular camaro) shes runnin good with 75,000 miles
could i beat a mitsubishi something er other with a turbo in it?? its an aftermarket turbo and its a crappy lookin car, 80s maybe early 90s car...the kid rides it around here like its hot sh** but i wanna show him what really is hot sh**...i gotta 89 iroc 305 tpi convt (dont forget convertible is heavier and 18" longer than a regular camaro) shes runnin good with 75,000 miles
1. just because it looks bad, doesnt mean its slow.
2. a 80s perhaps early 90s car? duuur, like a 3rdgen.. that also doesnt make it slow...
3. you KNOW its a aftermarket turbo, yet you talk **** when you have a fugging 305?!
4. a 89 iroc vert, while a nice looking cruiser, is also not hot ****.
5. the vert is NOT 18" longer.
your car is not badass, or even fast. there are FWD V6s and some stock turbo 4s that are faster. please dont be the dumb teenage kid that thinks hes MrBadass because its a V8 domestic.
why dont you take your ego, set it aside, and look at the kids car. most likely if it really is a aftermarket turbo car, its a DSM or somthing like that, and as long as the kid wasnt talking out of his *** about the turbo, you might learn somthing.
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
ok tough guy,
it looks bad because he beats it and doesn't take care of it, i know the kid
i'm saying its old and he beats it like its nobodys business
305 isn't *** but it should be better than what he does to his car, he buys some turbo and just slaps it on, not worrying about reliability or safety or ANYTHING about his car
while my car may not be the nicest thing around here, it isn't a POS by any means
check this rpo code E72 and tell me what comes up
this kid knows nothing about cars, they were trying to tell me my fully modded 350 (which currently ran 12s) would lose to their stock, beat to hell SUVs
it looks bad because he beats it and doesn't take care of it, i know the kid
i'm saying its old and he beats it like its nobodys business
305 isn't *** but it should be better than what he does to his car, he buys some turbo and just slaps it on, not worrying about reliability or safety or ANYTHING about his car
while my car may not be the nicest thing around here, it isn't a POS by any means
check this rpo code E72 and tell me what comes up
this kid knows nothing about cars, they were trying to tell me my fully modded 350 (which currently ran 12s) would lose to their stock, beat to hell SUVs
Last edited by 89IROCCVRT; 07-14-2004 at 10:43 PM.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arthur, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92Z28, 99SS, 83Z28 & 86GTA
Engine: 421, LS1, 327Turbo & 383
Transmission: T-56, 4L60E, T5 & 4L60
Axle/Gears: 4:10, 3:42, 2:73 & 3:27
Race him and find out
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: tucson
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 355c.i.
Transmission: th350
what the hell makes it so much longer
a lot of mitsu motors respond very well to turbos, wether they were designed to or not. just because it was cheap doesnt mean it wont help. a small turbo on a street car can be awesome, no lag and a quick round of boost can be good, even if it isnt perfect.
a lot of mitsu motors respond very well to turbos, wether they were designed to or not. just because it was cheap doesnt mean it wont help. a small turbo on a street car can be awesome, no lag and a quick round of boost can be good, even if it isnt perfect.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by nmirocz
mmmm...no, i dont think i'll be fearing a 305 anytime soon
mmmm...no, i dont think i'll be fearing a 305 anytime soon
#24
Originally posted by pasky
I've seen one hit 335 rwhp. . Not my cup o tea, i'd rather go bigger .
I've seen one hit 335 rwhp. . Not my cup o tea, i'd rather go bigger .
It takes a lot of money and time to get a 305 to that number 335 HP... all it takes for sbc 350 is a bigger carb, cams and head and your your there and more. LS1's get that out of the box.
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,550
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6
Originally posted by pasky
I've seen one hit 335 rwhp. . Not my cup o tea, i'd rather go bigger .
I've seen one hit 335 rwhp. . Not my cup o tea, i'd rather go bigger .
and btw, no one ever streached 3rdgens from the factory.. nor were they a ASC thing. your car isnt 18" longer... and if you dont believe me, go measure it.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,563
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1991 RS Camaro (Jet Black)
Engine: 95 383 CI (6.3) LT1
Transmission: 95 T-56
Originally posted by MrDude_1
is that a WHOLE 335? lmao..
and btw, no one ever streached 3rdgens from the factory.. nor were they a ASC thing. your car isnt 18" longer... and if you dont believe me, go measure it.
is that a WHOLE 335? lmao..
and btw, no one ever streached 3rdgens from the factory.. nor were they a ASC thing. your car isnt 18" longer... and if you dont believe me, go measure it.
#28
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
if it wasn't 18" longer why would they have that rpo code in there....just threw it in there for the hell of it
"haha lets throw in this rpo code for the hell of it....and lets say its because the car is made 18" longer"
"yeah great idea"
i'm sure the GM engineers or whoever it was thought exactly that before they put that rpo code in there, just to confuse the hell outta someone
"haha lets throw in this rpo code for the hell of it....and lets say its because the car is made 18" longer"
"yeah great idea"
i'm sure the GM engineers or whoever it was thought exactly that before they put that rpo code in there, just to confuse the hell outta someone
#31
It does infact list it that way. I cant believe that would mean that, I have never once in my life even heard of that until you said that. The convertibles were all T-top cars that were modded. Where is this length added to? The rear fenders. Please post a pic. Really Fascinating.
#32
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
i mean it may be true that they're not 18" longer, but why the hell would they make that RPO code and put it in there if it wasn't true?
#33
I dont know, unless it is referring to a specific object, or part, being 18 inches longer. I've just never seen one like that, thats all. Im gonan make a post in the history forum and see what they say about it.
#34
OK got all the answers here
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...9&goto=newpost
Just check that out. Someone new the RPO ****s pretty good.
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...9&goto=newpost
Just check that out. Someone new the RPO ****s pretty good.
#36
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cypress, SoCali
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2006 Tacoma X-Runner
Engine: 4.0L DOHC V6
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3:15 LSD
Those Mitsu's can be pretty quick. Especially the Eclipse GSX. Ask me how I know
My generation of DSM has 195 hp bone stock from the factory. The second generation of the Eclipses/Talons had 210 hp stock from the factory. These cars respond VERY well to mods and having AWD makes traction great with a 4500 rpm clutch dump
My generation of DSM has 195 hp bone stock from the factory. The second generation of the Eclipses/Talons had 210 hp stock from the factory. These cars respond VERY well to mods and having AWD makes traction great with a 4500 rpm clutch dump
#37
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Camaro
Engine: 305
Transmission: A4
stock turbod DSM against ur 305 and u will get ponied...ask me how i know???
my g/fs car can beat mine...how sad is that ... oh well good luck man. Hopefully its aftermarket lol
my g/fs car can beat mine...how sad is that ... oh well good luck man. Hopefully its aftermarket lol
#38
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ft. Branch, In.
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 formula WS6
Engine: 305 Lo3
Transmission: 700-R4
My 88 form must be exceptional, I beat an eclipse through 2nd gear and backed out of it at 70mph because I didn't think he could catch up. All I have is a 3" cat back, open element, base timing at 6*, and manual shifted at 5000rpm. I've also got 8mm accel wires, split-fire plug's. I know a 3000 gt will wup my ***, but I don't think eclipes's are all that!
#39
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cypress, SoCali
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2006 Tacoma X-Runner
Engine: 4.0L DOHC V6
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3:15 LSD
All depends on what Eclipse you raced. If you raced a GS then of course you should of won. Those cars are weak and the mid to late 90s ones had the Neon motor. Now if it was a GS-T or GSX then the driver either didn't know how to drive or it was an automatic. Those cars have stock 25-40 more hp than a stock LO3 and are lighter. Even with your mods you aren't touching the stock numbers of the turbo DSMs. I know my GSX is much quicker than my TA was when it was a 305. Now my TA as it sits now can murder my DSM I am not saying that the DSMs are the best thing in the world but they do deserve some respect. They aren't you average Honduh and can be very affordable performance cars. Plus shifting through an AWD turbocharged car is fun That's why you see a lot of V8 guys when they get an tuner car most of the time it's a DSM.
#40
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: tucson
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 355c.i.
Transmission: th350
Originally posted by trans87
All depends on what Eclipse you raced. If you raced a GS then of course you should of won. Those cars are weak and the mid to late 90s ones had the Neon motor. Now if it was a GS-T or GSX then the driver either didn't know how to drive or it was an automatic. Those cars have stock 25-40 more hp than a stock LO3 and are lighter. Even with your mods you aren't touching the stock numbers of the turbo DSMs. I know my GSX is much quicker than my TA was when it was a 305. Now my TA as it sits now can murder my DSM I am not saying that the DSMs are the best thing in the world but they do deserve some respect. They aren't you average Honduh and can be very affordable performance cars. Plus shifting through an AWD turbocharged car is fun That's why you see a lot of V8 guys when they get an tuner car most of the time it's a DSM.
All depends on what Eclipse you raced. If you raced a GS then of course you should of won. Those cars are weak and the mid to late 90s ones had the Neon motor. Now if it was a GS-T or GSX then the driver either didn't know how to drive or it was an automatic. Those cars have stock 25-40 more hp than a stock LO3 and are lighter. Even with your mods you aren't touching the stock numbers of the turbo DSMs. I know my GSX is much quicker than my TA was when it was a 305. Now my TA as it sits now can murder my DSM I am not saying that the DSMs are the best thing in the world but they do deserve some respect. They aren't you average Honduh and can be very affordable performance cars. Plus shifting through an AWD turbocharged car is fun That's why you see a lot of V8 guys when they get an tuner car most of the time it's a DSM.
#41
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cypress, SoCali
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2006 Tacoma X-Runner
Engine: 4.0L DOHC V6
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3:15 LSD
Originally posted by camaro-mayhem
lol. i still remember your post on dsmtalk or tuners whichever it was when you were asking about them. you never posted saying you got one tho anyways good choice on cars
lol. i still remember your post on dsmtalk or tuners whichever it was when you were asking about them. you never posted saying you got one tho anyways good choice on cars
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 trans am
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
race that dude and find out i've raced a 2.0 turbo talon and had no problem smoking that thing but then again i don't have a 305 anymore. but a 305 can be a good perfomer my friend has an rs with a worked 305tbi and it's not too bad.
#44
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '81 Camaro (Modded), '89 IROC cvrt (Stock), '00 GMC Jimmy
Engine: Modded 350 in '81, 305 TPI in '89 IROC, V6 Vortech in GMC
Transmission: T-350 in '81, 700-R4 in IROC
i'll race him if i ever see him, i mostly am either weight lifting, working, or at my gfs so that doesn't leave me much time for looking for races..
#45
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
LOL! You are a tough guy aren't you... "I don't have time to race, I'm either lifting weights of at my girlfriend's" blah blah blah. Nice excuse not to race.
Anyways, my buddy has a '93 Talon with the stock 2.0L NA and I beat the hell out of him through 2nd gear when he gave up. However, I know what those turbo DSMs can do. They are QUICK. It was actually one of the cars I was considering before I bought my TA. I probably will end up with one someday. The other car I was considering was a Nissan NX or 200SX SE-R. They aren't Hondas either, or anything like them. All the Nissan guys always make fun of the Hondas for having no torque, and most of the Nissan guys I know hate being called r!cers. My buddy is backing out of going to the track tomorrow. He's got a '92 Nissan NX2000 that should run close to my car in the 1/4, but mine is stock His car has headers, intake, full suspension, etc.
Anyways, I agree with whoever said something about this kid thinking he's really bad cuz he's got a V8. Those turbo DSMs are nothing to be laughed at. My cousin has a '97 TSi AWD running 11.3 at the track I love the looks of those cars too, and yes the 195HP stock rating of the 91-94 models is correct, and they weigh a lot less. I think the normal FWD turbo cars are like ~2800lbs and have 195HP. Having a stock turbo car makes it really easy to get quite a bit more power out of it really quickly as well..manual boost controllers are easy to make and can get to 225HP+ pretty easy.
Anyways, my buddy has a '93 Talon with the stock 2.0L NA and I beat the hell out of him through 2nd gear when he gave up. However, I know what those turbo DSMs can do. They are QUICK. It was actually one of the cars I was considering before I bought my TA. I probably will end up with one someday. The other car I was considering was a Nissan NX or 200SX SE-R. They aren't Hondas either, or anything like them. All the Nissan guys always make fun of the Hondas for having no torque, and most of the Nissan guys I know hate being called r!cers. My buddy is backing out of going to the track tomorrow. He's got a '92 Nissan NX2000 that should run close to my car in the 1/4, but mine is stock His car has headers, intake, full suspension, etc.
Anyways, I agree with whoever said something about this kid thinking he's really bad cuz he's got a V8. Those turbo DSMs are nothing to be laughed at. My cousin has a '97 TSi AWD running 11.3 at the track I love the looks of those cars too, and yes the 195HP stock rating of the 91-94 models is correct, and they weigh a lot less. I think the normal FWD turbo cars are like ~2800lbs and have 195HP. Having a stock turbo car makes it really easy to get quite a bit more power out of it really quickly as well..manual boost controllers are easy to make and can get to 225HP+ pretty easy.
#46
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Cypress, SoCali
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2006 Tacoma X-Runner
Engine: 4.0L DOHC V6
Transmission: 6-Speed Manual
Axle/Gears: 3:15 LSD
Originally posted by DuronClocker
Having a stock turbo car makes it really easy to get quite a bit more power out of it really quickly as well..manual boost controllers are easy to make and can get to 225HP+ pretty easy.
Having a stock turbo car makes it really easy to get quite a bit more power out of it really quickly as well..manual boost controllers are easy to make and can get to 225HP+ pretty easy.
#47
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: tucson
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Camaro
Engine: 355c.i.
Transmission: th350
Originally posted by trans87
Not to mention the stock shortblock can handle 300+ hp and the heads just need a little bit of port work to make them flow really nice. The 4G63T is an awesomely efficent motor. It has great flowing heads and very strong internals (6-bolt ones). Even the exhaust manifolds are great flowing with some mild port work. So basically stock you are getting awesome parts that just need some tweaking to get you going really fast. You can see why these cars are popular budget performance cars. My GSX just doesn't have the ***** out torque and sound my V8 TA does
Not to mention the stock shortblock can handle 300+ hp and the heads just need a little bit of port work to make them flow really nice. The 4G63T is an awesomely efficent motor. It has great flowing heads and very strong internals (6-bolt ones). Even the exhaust manifolds are great flowing with some mild port work. So basically stock you are getting awesome parts that just need some tweaking to get you going really fast. You can see why these cars are popular budget performance cars. My GSX just doesn't have the ***** out torque and sound my V8 TA does
lol 6k clutch drop + awd = great. tho the sound is definetely lacking
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2004 Pontiac GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12
He is lighter, turbo'd (for fifty bucks on ebay... comon now!) and if he has AWD you will get raped.
and please... get over yourself with lifting weights and being over at the gf's. Lame.
and please... get over yourself with lifting weights and being over at the gf's. Lame.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post